Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) vs. Progress Telerik
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | Score7.3 out of 10 | N/A | Application Server is an expanded server role in the Windows Server® 2008 operating system. It provided an integrated environment for deploying and running custom, server-based business applications. These applications respond to requests that arrive over the network from remote client computers or from other applications. Application Server is deprecated. | N/A |
Progress Telerik | Score9.4 out of 10 | N/A | With Telerik UI libraries, Progress aims to equip .NET ninjas with a full arsenal of weapons, helping to create beautiful, modern and future-proof applications quickly and intuitively. The vendor states that with its over 1,250 UI components for all .NET platforms, as well as various themes, skins and customization options, Telerik users report cutting development time by up to 50 percent. Web | $999 per developer, royalty-free |
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | Progress Telerik | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | Progress Telerik | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 7 Answers | 97% Would buy again 28 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | 92% Delivers good value for the price 24 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | 97% Happy with the feature set 28 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | 96% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 23 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 7 Answers | 96% Implementation went as expected 26 Answers | |
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | Progress Telerik | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Servers |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | Progress Telerik | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | NGINX Score9.1 out of 10 | Syncfusion Essential Studio Score7.3 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Oracle WebLogic Server Score7.3 out of 10 | D3.js Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | NGINX Score9.1 out of 10 | Progress Kendo UI Score8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | Progress Telerik | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 9.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 10.0 |
| Usability | 10.0 | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 9.0 | 9.3 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.0 |
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | Progress Telerik | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Progress Telerik Screenshots |








