Microsoft Dynamics SL vs. Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Score 5.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family. This product was acquired from Solomon 2000. The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.N/A
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) is a solution that helps users model and plan across finance, HR, supply chain, and sales, streamline the financial close process.
$250
per user/per month
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics SLOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
EPM Standard
$250
per user/per month
EPM Enterprise
$500
per user/per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics SLOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPricing per user varies by component within the Oracle EPM Cloud solution. Please see pricing information for the EPM Cloud components on cloud.oracle.com or contact Oracle Sales at +1.800.633.0738.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics SLOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Features
Microsoft Dynamics SLOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.5
2 Ratings
14% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Pay calculation9.62 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
6 Ratings
21% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
API for custom integration6.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins6.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.7
10 Ratings
4% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability7.49 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions10.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.0
10 Ratings
9% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Dashboards8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports8.010 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports8.010 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.1
11 Ratings
8% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Accounts payable6.011 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable6.08 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers6.63 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations3.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
6 Ratings
33% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking5.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.2
4 Ratings
23% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Pricing6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry3.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
4 Ratings
27% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Billing Management6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management7.33 Ratings00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting6.32 Ratings00 Ratings
Period Close6.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.7
3 Ratings
47% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting7.33 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Costing6.33 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Capture2.12 Ratings00 Ratings
Capital Project Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.3
1 Ratings
16% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
21% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Production Management6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
18% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Inventory Planning6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
5.6
3 Ratings
29% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings8.12 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings4.43 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings4.43 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
6.7
23 Ratings
15% below category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings6.022 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings7.021 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings7.019 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.5
19 Ratings
7% below category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings8.016 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.019 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings7.017 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings7.015 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
5.9
3 Ratings
23% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings6.03 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings6.83 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings5.13 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.2
24 Ratings
16% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings7.020 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings6.023 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.020 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings8.021 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.2
2 Ratings
4% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings6.22 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
6.6
38 Ratings
21% below category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings7.030 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings7.038 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings6.037 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings6.035 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings7.033 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.3
20 Ratings
6% below category average
Financial data consolidation00 Ratings7.017 Ratings
Journal entries and reports00 Ratings6.014 Ratings
Multi-currency management00 Ratings8.013 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings8.014 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings7.012 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings8.016 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings7.016 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.2
34 Ratings
9% below category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings7.029 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings8.032 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings9.030 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings6.028 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings6.019 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
6.8
25 Ratings
17% below category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings7.025 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings7.73 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings7.44 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings6.74 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings6.024 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings6.024 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.0
36 Ratings
16% below category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings7.034 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings7.032 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings7.028 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics SLOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SLOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
5.0
(18 ratings)
8.5
(46 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.4
(8 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
3.0
(7 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Availability
9.9
(2 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
1.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.5
(4 ratings)
6.8
(3 ratings)
Online Training
1.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(4 ratings)
8.2
(16 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
1.4
(2 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics SLOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
For a small to mid-size business, MS Dynamics SL is effective. We are capable of managing our finances with a very low risk of error. We have worked with MS Dynamics for almost 15 years and have more than doubled the size of our business in that time with very few issues from the program. We have exponentially increased our revenue and reporting demands and have found SL to be very dependable and stable. The program does have the occasional glitch and those are sometimes outside of the realm of expertise of our IT department. SL support is excellent, but their timeliness is not as urgent as ours.
Read full review
Oracle
It is well suited in a geographically distributed environment where you have various key participants in multiple time zones providing input and necessary explanations on performance and measured success It is less appropriate where you have a single office environment with a single finance department working together. It is also less suited when the GL is NOT an Oracle product and the interface between the GL and the reporting software needs to be implemented with utmost care and handling.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Provides flexibility for complex project based cost accounting
  • Strong and flexible allocation processer for cost allocations, markups, and pricing
  • A "Flexible Billing" module under the project controller series that allows for multiple billing formats ranging from fixed price schedule of values, T&M or Cost Plus, and scheduled billing.
  • Flexible reporting with options using Crystal Reports, SSRS, a Quick Query tool, and ability to tie into MS Office tools such as MS Access and MS Excel
  • Tight integration with Financials, but also the ability to integrate with modules such as Sales Order, Inventory, and Field Service
  • Customization abilities ranging from a VBA (visual basic for application) foundation to allow customizing existing forms to the ability to use the SDK (Software Development Kit) to build more complex customizations that integrate with Dynamics SL.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Account Reconciliation CLoud Services provides tight integration with Oracle R12 and 11i . Provides drillback capability. It is flexible and provides rich functionality to users.
  • We have implemented ARCS on cloud and migrated planning and budgeting from On premise to PBCS and EPBCS. Functionality is onpar with onpremise. Provides regular updates monthly
  • We don't need to upgrades every year and saved a lot on Hardware.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Reporting in the Project module is lacking functionality. I understand that most companies have specific needs when it comes to tracking project information but the standard reports are not good.
  • I would recommend a product like Management Reporter that is for Projects only. Project Reporter should allow users to pull in all Project related data into reports.
  • Fixing suspended batches. Obviously all of us users have experienced this mess. SL knows what needs to be corrected and there could be some step by step fixes in a separate repair module to do the steps we do in Query Analyzer.
Read full review
Oracle
  • The limitation of constrained out of the box dimensions that requires ripping the initial implementation to add the new dimensions is a major drawback.
  • Smartview interface is cumbersome for many.
  • The only financial adapter is available for integration for other modules we have to go with file-based uploads which is cumbersome and not real-time.
  • It is very costly in terms of licensing unlike other Oracle products.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
Read full review
Oracle
We have a pretty good userbase who are at the high level who gained value from this tool. Discontinuing this tool is prone to impact their day to day operations. Also the data in this tool cannot alter the source, which maintains the integrity of this tool. Smartview is a cool addition that gained lot of traction as well.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
I rate it a 10 because we have removed the fields we don't need so users can really crank the data into the system. The software was designed for the professional services firm in mind but does a tremendous job for construction firms and "blended" companies that are both distribution firms but project centric as well. Perhaps they drop ship inventory to a project where their employees or subs need to work on a project for example.
Read full review
Oracle
It produces consolidated multi currency reports faster and more accurately whilst adding additional pivotal functionality. The Smartview reporting is a key for us and a flagstone of the application
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
Read full review
Oracle
EPM has been so far available all the time
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Oracle
The product performance is so far very good
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
Support is only used when needed, so unfortunately ,they get all the odd issues. It's a difficult business, but Microsoft and our firm do a great job of meeting customer needs. We get routine feedback that our support services are very good.
Read full review
Oracle
Support from our implementation partner is a 10/10, but support from Oracle is awful. Case in point: recently over a 2-day period, there were a series of intermittent outages. Oracle actually asked US for the outage time-stamps. I would have thought that, since we were paying them, they should probably be able to tell us!
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
Read full review
Oracle
I suggest doubling the time to implement from the initial quote you get from the Sales team. That's always been the case for me for multiple EPMs now. The out-of-the-box functionality of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is pretty robust so I appreciate that and it really helped us get the ball rolling quickly.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Of the comparable mid-range ERP systems, Dynamics SL competes at the lower end based on price, but also above the high-end based on flexibility, data, and reporting. Being able to stay with the same core accounting from a $100 million dollar company to a $3 billion dollar company shows the range of capabilities.
Read full review
Oracle
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud fared very well against Adaptive, Anaplan, and Host Analytics. We ultimately decided on Oracle due to its reputation and strength of existing customers. We are happy with our decision.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
Since the backbone of the database is MS SQLServer, the database can be easily scaled.
Read full review
Oracle
The product is scalable
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • More time is spent on manipulating reports which can and should be automated.
  • Lack of electronic invoicing process and other green technology features creates more cost on printing and storage costs.
  • The lack of a user friendly interface requires more training and a bigger learning curve for staff.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Significantly reduced the amount of money we spent for the maintenance of in-house hardware.
  • We now need less employees to manage the configurations of Oracle EPM Cloud.
  • There have been many time savings as a whole to apply to more productive causes.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management Screenshots

Screenshot of Process and Workflow - Flexible Workflow and Process Management - Annotations - Concurrency in UsageScreenshot of Integration - External Integration - Oracle ERP Systems and Hybrid On-Premise DeploymentScreenshot of Planning and Forecasting - Decision-Oriented Plans with Instant Feedback Loop - What-If Modeling and SandboxScreenshot of Process and Workflow - Flexible Workflow and Process Management - Annotations - Concurrency in UsageScreenshot of User Interface - Role-Based, Intuitive User Interface - Role-Based Navigation Flows - Microsoft Office InterfaceScreenshot of Integration - External Integration - Oracle ERP Systems and Hybrid On-Premise Deployment