Microsoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family.
This product was acquired from Solomon 2000.
The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.
N/A
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Score7.4 out of 10
N/A
Oracle's Corporate Performance Management suite was acquired from Hyperion in 2007. Hyperion customers are encouraged to migrate to Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM.
N/A
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Score6.9 out of 10
N/A
An ERP primarily aimed at medium-sized companies that combines financial management capabilities contain the familiar general ledger along with expense management, accounts payable and receivable (AP/AR), advanced cost accounting, and fixed asset accounting.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Key User Insights
Would buy again
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Delivers good value for the price
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Happy with the feature set
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Lived up to sales and marketing promises
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Features
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy) and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.5
2 Ratings
12% above category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.5
11 Ratings
0% below category average
Pay calculation
9.62 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.010 Ratings
Direct deposit files
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.09 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.09 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy) and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
6 Ratings
22% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.0
16 Ratings
6% above category average
API for custom integration
6.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.013 Ratings
Plug-ins
6.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.015 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy) and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.7
10 Ratings
4% above category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.5
21 Ratings
1% above category average
Single sign-on capability
7.49 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.015 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
10.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.021 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy) and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.0
10 Ratings
6% above category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.7
18 Ratings
3% above category average
Dashboards
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.013 Ratings
Standard reports
8.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.017 Ratings
Custom reports
8.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.015 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy) and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.1
11 Ratings
8% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
23 Ratings
7% below category average
Accounts payable
6.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.022 Ratings
Accounts receivable
6.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.020 Ratings
Global Financial Support
6.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.015 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
6.63 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.017 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
3.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.017 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.016 Ratings
Standardized Processes
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.019 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy) and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
6 Ratings
33% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.9
16 Ratings
1% below category average
Inventory tracking
5.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.016 Ratings
Location management
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.014 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.012 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy) and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.2
4 Ratings
24% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
17 Ratings
10% below category average
Pricing
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.016 Ratings
Order entry
3.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.016 Ratings
Credit card processing
7.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.88 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.113 Ratings
Order Orchestration
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy) and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
4 Ratings
28% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.0
21 Ratings
8% below category average
Billing Management
6.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.015 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.018 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.012 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
6.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
5.710 Ratings
Period Close
6.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.916 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy) and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.7
3 Ratings
47% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
11 Ratings
5% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
5.38 Ratings
Project Costing
6.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.09 Ratings
Cost Capture
2.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.88 Ratings
Capital Project Management
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.99 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.56 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.06 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy) and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.3
1 Ratings
17% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.4
6 Ratings
1% below category average
Award Lifecycle Management
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy) and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
22% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.0
9 Ratings
7% below category average
Production Management
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
4.38 Ratings
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
4.86 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.35 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy) and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
20% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.3
13 Ratings
15% below category average
Inventory Planning
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.013 Ratings
Forecasting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
5.410 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.08 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy) and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
10.0
22 Ratings
8% above category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
-
Ratings
Long-term financial planning
00 Ratings
10.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Financial budgeting
00 Ratings
10.020 Ratings
00 Ratings
Forecasting
00 Ratings
10.021 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scenario modeling
00 Ratings
10.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Management reporting
00 Ratings
10.021 Ratings
00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy) and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
8.2
20 Ratings
9% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
-
Ratings
Personalized dashboards
00 Ratings
8.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards
00 Ratings
7.115 Ratings
00 Ratings
KPIs
00 Ratings
9.917 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis
00 Ratings
9.917 Ratings
00 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting
00 Ratings
8.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data
00 Ratings
6.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy) and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.8
6 Ratings
21% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy) and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.9
13 Ratings
3% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
4.36 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.55 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.09 Ratings
Supplier Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.011 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy) and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.6
4 Ratings
12% above category average
Risk Repository
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.34 Ratings
Control Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.23 Ratings
Issue Detection
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.73 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.83 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy) and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.9
10 Ratings
1% below category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.06 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
5.55 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.07 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy) and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
For a small to mid-size business, MS Dynamics SL is effective. We are capable of managing our finances with a very low risk of error. We have worked with MS Dynamics for almost 15 years and have more than doubled the size of our business in that time with very few issues from the program. We have exponentially increased our revenue and reporting demands and have found SL to be very dependable and stable. The program does have the occasional glitch and those are sometimes outside of the realm of expertise of our IT department. SL support is excellent, but their timeliness is not as urgent as ours.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Well suited: For use in multiple offices around the world. I was able to obtain financial reporting data from 5 foreign offices and then consolidate their data with 3 domestic USA offices to prepare a consolidated financial statement. Less Appropriate: Translating the financial value for consulting services could be a bit challenging because that required human interaction and judgement. It would have been great to be able to set up some software to be able to interpret this and let it run for all future project work revenue projection.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
If there are lot of complicated systems this might not be the best system. If you have only some complexity Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a product a technical or application person can wrap their hands around and understand the whole system.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Provides flexibility for complex project based cost accounting
Strong and flexible allocation processer for cost allocations, markups, and pricing
A "Flexible Billing" module under the project controller series that allows for multiple billing formats ranging from fixed price schedule of values, T&M or Cost Plus, and scheduled billing.
Flexible reporting with options using Crystal Reports, SSRS, a Quick Query tool, and ability to tie into MS Office tools such as MS Access and MS Excel
Tight integration with Financials, but also the ability to integrate with modules such as Sales Order, Inventory, and Field Service
Customization abilities ranging from a VBA (visual basic for application) foundation to allow customizing existing forms to the ability to use the SDK (Software Development Kit) to build more complex customizations that integrate with Dynamics SL.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
This product handles budgeting by Employee and/or Position very well. It is highly flexible and allows Hyperion administrators the ability to develop a planning application that fits a variety of different business needs.
It is great at calculating benefits using business rules to automate the population of these fringe costs in the overall budget planning process. This greatly reduces user error.
It allows you to seed the operating budget based on changes to key drivers, such as percentage increases, flat dollar increases and more detailed changes using business rules.
Allows visibility into the plans for each unit across the organization, rolled up into an overall budget for the campus.
It handles the creation of budgets with multiple chartfield segments or dimensions, which most other budgeting systems cannot handle well. It can aggregate these very quickly.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The new versions (9.2) of JDE has so much open functionality and really gives the user control over the screens and what they want to see. Love that the layout of the screen is really up to the user and what they want to see it along with freezing columns and creating favorites for way access.
It is so flexible with the system platforms that it can run on and so easy to customize since it supports so many databases.
It is intuitive and does not need to have a lot of training on how to use the software.
It's just a great ERP software and one of the better ones I've seen.
Oracle is FINALLY starting to listen to the users and SIGs and putting enhancements into the system which makes life easier for us business users.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting in the Project module is lacking functionality. I understand that most companies have specific needs when it comes to tracking project information but the standard reports are not good.
I would recommend a product like Management Reporter that is for Projects only. Project Reporter should allow users to pull in all Project related data into reports.
Fixing suspended batches. Obviously all of us users have experienced this mess. SL knows what needs to be corrected and there could be some step by step fixes in a separate repair module to do the steps we do in Query Analyzer.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
One pain point for us is the consolidation and translation process. Needing to translate the data over and over again is frustrating and there is no visibility into how many users are running a translation. If multiple users attempt to translate the same data set, say goodbye to your performance but you have no way of knowing! (Unless you want to pull up a task audit which is not a very realistic expectation). It has the been the quickest way for us to bring the system to it's knees. The consolidation process performs in direct correlation to the complexity of the calculation/consolidation rules. So, while the product is extremely flexible, you still have to be careful how you design your rules and calculations to make sure that you do it on the smallest subset of data as possible to avoid large processing times. This makes sense, but requires some significant expertise that most organizations do not have in-house.
The Hyperion Financial Reporting product is ridiculously outdated and clunky to use. The interface for designing reports is not intuitive, and not easy to modify once a report is built. I think there must be a strategic decision to move away from it and go to something more like Oracle BI because I just can't understand why in the world they don't update the reporting product. It also requires a significant level of expertise to be able to use. Not a great solution at all if you want multiple end-users to create reports in something other than Excel. Nobody except the HFM admin (which I used to be) in our company even touches this module.
Another pain point is the amount of IT support that is required to run this thing, and again, specialized knowledge of Hyperion products and how they work is required for IT to adequately support it. This goes for application servers and the Oracle database that the applications are running on.
The Configurable Network Language (CNC) is a proprietary protocol, and it can be difficult to source resources that understand this language well.
It has some inherent limitations with generating PDF or printable files. Most organizations use a third party platform like Creat!form or Bottomline to solve this.
No built in credit card processing solution, and no plug-and-play eCommerce or webstore capabilities available.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We're in the middle of the road because we are not sure that other products on the market fit the bill for what we need yet. Hyperion is expensive and burdensome from an administrator and maintenance standpoint, but it still seems to be the best solution for what we need. Show us an equally capable SaaS consolidation product and we'll talk again.
I rate it a 10 because we have removed the fields we don't need so users can really crank the data into the system. The software was designed for the professional services firm in mind but does a tremendous job for construction firms and "blended" companies that are both distribution firms but project centric as well. Perhaps they drop ship inventory to a project where their employees or subs need to work on a project for example.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Support is only used when needed, so unfortunately ,they get all the odd issues. It's a difficult business, but Microsoft and our firm do a great job of meeting customer needs. We get routine feedback that our support services are very good.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The premium support team provides much needed dedicated customer service which we are after for what we have paid for this service. We are satisfied with the service and support and do not have any instance where there was an issue that requires escalation to get the right support team. Though the incidence of major issues that requires the premium support are less, we prefer to keep this as a safety net.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Of the comparable mid-range ERP systems, Dynamics SL competes at the lower end based on price, but also above the high-end based on flexibility, data, and reporting. Being able to stay with the same core accounting from a $100 million dollar company to a $3 billion dollar company shows the range of capabilities.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I use Oracle Hyperion Enterprise Performance Mangement because the company I work at requires me to use it in the Financial Planning sector as most of their data is stored in it. I am open minded and ready to use other performance management tools created by Oracle if my work permits.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
It is simple to use and implement as compared to complex softwares in the market that may take ample amount of time to implement. The budget is also slightly less to provide the same functionality that other softwares are providing. Also having Oracle database that comes with the system is much easier to handle and use and have much security.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Oracle Hyperion allows us to automate and consolidate financial data that used to be performed manually in spreadsheets. From that perspective the ROI is huge.
Oracle Hyperion functionality is extensive and allows us to perform most functions for planning, consolidating and reporting on our financial data.
One negative with Oracle Hyperion is that it is complicated to implement and maintain. It takes expertise at all levels (infrastructure and management) to realize the benefits from it.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's advantage is significant cost savings and operational improvements when you run Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne in the Oracle Cloud. Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers the only no-compromise enterprise cloud platform for moving Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, its associated database systems, an ecosystem of apps to the cloud. Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's One-Click Provisioning tool allows you to deploy Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne on the Oracle Cloud in hours, not days while maintaining the integrity of existing customized apps.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info