Microsoft Remote Desktop Connection Manager (RDCMan) vs. RemoteCall PC/Mobile/Visual

As a IT specialist we have some servers we need acces to. I like to use Remote Desktop Connection Manager because it feel like you are on the computer. Is feel very trusted. Some colleagues use the Azure remote desktop version but I always recommend the windows integrated option. We also have our primary business application running on a server so they use a remote desktop connection too to log on to the server.

Incentivized

There was an engineer call due to an emergency failure at the customer. It took an hour for the engineer to move and get to the site. So, using RemoteCall, I immediately supported the problem while moving. The customer's problems were resolved before arriving on-site, and the customer was satisfied thanks to the quick handling and response. Without RemoteCall, the golden hour would have been missed.

Incentivized

• I can see previews of all the machines working at the same time.
• Having all password in one place.
• Organization of devices based on purpose, configuration, etc.

Incentivized

• low cost.
• fast access.
• Remote mobile service.

Incentivized

• When trying to connect to a server/machine, and it doesn't connect, there is a "Disconnected" message that is displayed in the thumbnail. There is no information beyond this that explains why the server/machine did/could not connect. It would be helpful to the IT Administrator to know this information, even if Microsoft Remote Desktop Connection Manager (RDCMan) kept a log somewhere where this information can be analyzed.
• There doesn't seem to be an option for connecting to a server that is usually only able to be accessed from a jump server. This will not connect if the server is set up as a server/machine within RDCman. This would be a beneficial feature to have within RDCman. Maybe one of the missing options is to be able to set this in the prospects for the jump server (within the Microsoft Remote Desktop Connection Manager (RDCMan) window).

Incentivized

• They need to invest more in advertising.
• Fewer users than competitors.

Incentivized

As alluded to in previous responses it is a very functional tool. It allows me to do my job quickly and efficiently every single day. There are little to no issues using the connection on a day to day basis. It handles everything you need from a remote connection perspective.

Incentivized

Plenty of information and support online, and with many things it's pretty straight forward for the average tech to navigate and work with. But with most things online you're not the only person that's had the issue before, and using a search engine you should be able to figure it out.

Incentivized

RDCMan outshines TeamViewer in every possible way. It’s fast, more reliable, and easier to use. I have had frequent crashes and issues when using TeamViewer, while none with RDCMan. Screen responsiveness also seems much better with RDCMan versus TeamViewer. I would often experience lag issues when using TeamViewer.

Incentivized

RemoteCall and TeamViewer are both good products. However, technical support for TeamViewer is difficult. When a problem occurred, it did not respond immediately and took a long time and it took too much time and money to customize it for the company. On the other hand, RemoteCall provided various services at a low cost. In particular, it was customized to satisfy 100% of our requirements with a demanding customer.RemoteCall is the best value for money.

Incentivized

• its less time consuming for IT engineers because they have everything on one please
• less FTE for the tasks
• Lack of MFA option

Incentivized

• Saved a lot of time and money.
• Low cost.

Incentivized