Microsoft Security Copilot vs. Palo Alto Networks WildFire

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Security Copilot
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Security Copilot helps security and IT teams to protect organizations at the speed and scale of AI. It is available in a standalone experience or embedded into other Microsoft Security products.N/A
Palo Alto Networks WildFire
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Palo Alto Network’s WildFire is a malware prevention service. It specializes in addressing zero-day threats through dynamic and static analysis, machine learning, and advanced sandbox testing environments.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Security CopilotPalo Alto Networks WildFire
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Security CopilotPalo Alto Networks WildFire
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Security CopilotPalo Alto Networks WildFire
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Security CopilotPalo Alto Networks WildFire
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 9.3 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 9.3 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Security CopilotPalo Alto Networks WildFire
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(13 ratings)
8.0
(9 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
7.6
(13 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Security CopilotPalo Alto Networks WildFire
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Microsoft Security Copilot is well-suited for environments where security teams face high alert volumes and need rapid triage. It is effective during active threat response, helping us establish timelines and suggest remediation steps quickly. Copilot also excels in executive reporting, generating clear summaries for leadership without much effort. Security Copilot is less effective outside of Microsoft's ecosystem because it doesn't integrate well with other products.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
Palo Alto Networks WildFire is highly effective in enterprise environments where detecting zero-day threats and unknown malware is critical. Small businesses may find the cost of advanced subscriptions prohibitive, especially if they only need basic protection. Much of our infrastructure is OT and Palo Alto Networks WildFire is cloud dependent so cannot be used where we have air-gapped systems.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Quickly analyze alerts by doings simple analysis or from different inbuilt security tools.
  • Smart threat investigation use AI for analyzing user behavior, activity and network logs.
  • Automated generate reports and gives the steps to fix the threats.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • This is could base and easily manageable for our collocation. While working within the could can review in live time potential treats that it has reported from other devices.
  • Worked very well with existing Palo Alto devices.
  • Another huge plus is the simplicity of managing and ease of scalability.
  • Its cost is competitive with similar/like products available.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • It is super expensive, which can be a turn off for many small businesses looking to leverage its capabilities
  • It can be very complex to set up, with many prerequisite steps that need to happen prior to being able to use it
  • With all AI-based solutions, it can sometimes hallucinate, but that is to be expected at some level
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Cost
  • I would personally like to see more JSON support in the API rather than XML, but that's being very nitpicky
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Palo Alto Networks
It works very well and takes care of protecting us from threats new and well-known. It's been a game changer in terms of threat detection & prevention.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Anyone can use it. Easy to prompt, also capabilities to become advance with custom agents. It can become custom to your workflow. Many people will have their unique experiences to share and results are generally positive. This is a growth in the product from the effect of community and adoption/usage.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
It is a great product that has definitely improved our security posture, however it does require quite a bit of training and time spent customizing for the environment. We had several difficulties in deployment but Palo Alto support was able to help us work through the problems that we were not able to figure out on our own.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Palo Alto Networks
PAN support is very good. You can get the reasonable and timely support on any conditions. When the product is already integrated with the PAN firewalls, you can choose the severity levels based on the effect. The customer service/TAC is very helpful, they even have additional recommendations of advises for product usability. Local partners are also assisting the cases and give their expertise.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
My usage of other products is based on SIEM tools. So far, Microsoft Security Copilot is the only product I've seen that works across multiple technologies/products to provide full visibility into security tooling using AI. I know other vendors are working towards this, but Microsoft has definitely taken a lead.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
WildFire from Palo Alto Networks provides security with very little overhead. With AutoFocus, they’ve got threat intelligence built right in. That way, it can prepare us to react swiftly when a significant danger is identified and dealt with as soon as possible. They introduced firewalls that are aware of applications and can make use of Wildfire. It sped our ability to respond to emerging threats up because of this game-changing development.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Helps reduce time spent creating a baseline script.
  • Some errors get corrected but then get reintroduced while adding functionality.
  • I noticed that when using this for PowerShell it will sometimes have you install the module in the script without verifying if it is already installed. You must read the script before executing.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • We've had one or two malware files that were blocked by Wildfire. We use it occasionally to check unusual or unexpected files. Hard to monetize ROI, because we don't know what the impact would have been if the file made it through.
  • We pay significantly for the Wildfire licenses, but given the potential impact to our business, we feel it is worthwhile. Figure costs are somewhere around $1,500 per year per firewall for a mid-range model. Can be higher or lower for different sized firewalls. Onsite appliance was somewhere between $50-100K, which was too much for us, so we use the cloud model.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Microsoft Security Copilot Screenshots

Screenshot of Defender USX guided responseScreenshot of Defender USX incident summaryScreenshot of the homepage - capabilities menuScreenshot of the homepageScreenshot of MDTI threat intelScreenshot of session - incident summary