TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    MongoDB

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AMongoDB is an open source document-oriented database system. It is part of the NoSQL family of database systems. Instead of storing data in tables as is done in a "classical" relational database, MongoDB stores structured data as JSON-like documents with dynamic schemas (MongoDB calls the format BSON), making the integration of data in certain types of applications easier and faster.

    $0.10

    million reads

    MongoDB Atlas

    Score7.8 out of 10
    N/AMongoDB Atlas is the company's automated managed cloud service, supplying automated deployment, provisioning and patching, and other features supporting database monitoring and optimization.

    $57

    per month

    Neo4j

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ANeo4j is an open source embeddable graph database developed by Neo Technologies based in San Mateo, California with an office in Sweden.

    $65

    per month

    Pricing
    MongoDBMongoDB AtlasNeo4j
    Editions & Modules
    Shared
    $0
    per month
    Serverless
    $0.10million reads
    million reads
    Dedicated
    $57
    per month
    Dedicated Clusters
    $57
    per month
    Dedicated Multi-Reigon Clusters
    $95
    per month
    Shared Clusters
    Free
    Aura Professional
    $65
    per month
    Community Edition
    Free
    Enterprise Edition
    Contact Sales
    Aura Free
    Free
    Aura Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    MongoDBMongoDB AtlasNeo4j
    Free Trial
    YesNoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsFully managed, global cloud database on AWS, Azure, and GCP——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    MongoDBMongoDB AtlasNeo4j
    Considered Multiple Products
    MongoDB
    Chose MongoDB
    There are use cases for both relational and non-relational databases. MongoDB is simply a different method of storing data, but I find it to be faster and more intuitive than relational models.
    Incentivized
    Chose MongoDB
    - Mongo had a query language
    - Mongo could be run easily on my laptop
    Incentivized
    MongoDB
    Chose MongoDB Atlas
    Both AWS RDS and MongoDB Atlas provide a state-of-the-art managed database hosting service, with the difference being the type of databases they support. AWS RDS does not support MongoDB engine and Atlas only supports MongoDB. So I consider them complimentary services and we …
    Incentivized
    Chose MongoDB Atlas
    MongoDB Atlas has an excellent rating out there in the market. They have a great supporting team as well. When we have questions about technical stuff, they respond fast. The performance of MongoDB Atlas is the key factor that we choose to use. Because it has such an easy way …
    Incentivized
    Chose MongoDB Atlas
    MongoDB is a great product but on premise deployments can be slow. So we turned to Atlas. We also looked at Redis Labs and we use Redis as our side cache for app servers. But we love using MongoDB Atlas for cloud deployments, especially for prototyping because we can get …
    Incentivized
    Neo Technologies
    Chose Neo4j
    Neo4j is a graph store and has different use cases compared to another NoSQL Document store like MongoDB. MongoDB is a bad choice when joins are common as existing operators for joining two documents (similar to tables in a relational store) as Mongo 3.5 use SQL like join …
    Incentivized
    Chose Neo4j
    • For easy query language and better graphical representation on small dataset
    • Also easy to set up and handle on the server.
    • On top of that Neo4j also provides an API support to interact through any system.
    Incentivized
    Chose Neo4j
    Neo4j is ahead of any of the leading competitors I know. The only one which comes close, in my opinion, is the "Titan-Distributed Graph Database" which is completely open source and free to use. Titan works on top of Apache Cassandra so it has some huge learning curves to do, …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    12 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    12 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    12 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    9 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    12 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    MongoDBMongoDB AtlasNeo4j
    NoSQL Databases
    Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of MongoDB and MongoDB Atlas and Neo4j
    Feature
    MongoDB
    10.0
    39 Ratings
    16% above category average
    MongoDB Atlas
    -
    Ratings
    Neo4j
    -
    Ratings
    Performance10.039 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Availability10.039 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Concurrency10.039 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security10.039 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scalability10.039 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data model flexibility10.039 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility10.038 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Database-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Database-as-a-Service features of MongoDB and MongoDB Atlas and Neo4j
    Feature
    MongoDB
    -
    Ratings
    MongoDB Atlas
    8.9
    6 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Neo4j
    -
    Ratings
    Automatic software patching00 Ratings9.16 Ratings00 Ratings
    Database scalability00 Ratings9.96 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated backups00 Ratings9.96 Ratings00 Ratings
    Database security provisions00 Ratings9.16 Ratings00 Ratings
    Monitoring and metrics00 Ratings6.56 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automatic host deployment00 Ratings9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    MongoDBMongoDB AtlasNeo4j
    Small Businesses
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Google BigQuery
    Score8.8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Azure Database
    Score8.8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Google Cloud SQL
    Score8.7 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    MongoDBMongoDB AtlasNeo4j
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (79 ratings)
    8.3
    (6 ratings)
    9.0
    (10 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (67 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (15 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Availability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.6
    (13 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.4
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    MongoDBMongoDB AtlasNeo4j
    Likelihood to Recommend
    MongoDB
    If asked by a colleague I would highly recommend MongoDB. MongoDB provides incredible flexibility and is quick and easy to set up. It also provides extensive documentation which is very useful for someone new to the tool. Though I've used it for years and still referenced the docs often. From my experience and the use cases I've worked on, I'd suggest using it anywhere that needs a fast, efficient storage space for non-relational data. If a relational database is needed then another tool would be more apt.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    It is good if you: 1. Have unstructured data that you need to save (since it is NoSQL DB) 2. You don't have time or knowledge to setup the MongoDB Atlas, the managed service is the way to go (Atlas) 3. If you need a multi regional DB across the world
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Neo Technologies
    Neo4J is great for creating network graphs or illustrating how things are related. It is also good for finding individuals or things that have greater influence than others in a system. It is not appropriate if you have standard data sets that can be analyzed using conventional methods or visualized using Tableau, for example.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    MongoDB
    • Being a JSON language optimizes the response time of a query, you can directly build a query logic from the same service
    • You can install a local, database-based environment rather than the non-relational real-time bases such a firebase does not allow, the local environment is paramount since you can work without relying on the internet.
    • Forming collections in Mango is relatively simple, you do not need to know of query to work with it, since it has a simple graphic environment that allows you to manage databases for those who are not experts in console management.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    • Generous free and trial plan for evaluation or test purposes.
    • New versions of MongoDB are able to be deployed with Atlas as soon as they're released—deploying recent versions to other services can be difficult or risky.
    • As the key supporters of the open source MongoDB project, the service runs in a highly optimized and performant manner, making it much easier than having to do the work internally.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Neo Technologies
    • Mature Query language, I found Cypher QL to be mature in handling all sorts of problems we throw at it. Its expressive enough to be intuitive while providing rich features for various scenarios.
    • Native support for REST API, that makes interacting with Neo4J intuitive and easy.
    • Support for Procedures in Java, procedures are custom code that could be added to the Neo4J to write custom querying of data. The best part about the procedures is it could be invoked using the REST API. This allows us to overcome any shortcomings from their Cypher query language.
    • Nice UI and interface for executing the Query and visualizing the response.
    • UI access controlled by User credentials allows for neat access controls.
    • Awesome free community edition for small-scale projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    MongoDB
    • An aggregate pipeline can be a bit overwhelming as a newcomer.
    • There's still no real concept of joins with references/foreign keys, although the aggregate framework has a feature that is close.
    • Database management/dev ops can still be time-consuming if rolling your own deployments. (Thankfully there are plenty of providers like Compose or even MongoDB's own Atlas that helps take care of the nitty-gritty.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    • For someone new, it could be challenging using MongoDB Atlas. Some official video tutorials could help a lot
    • Pricing calculation is sometimes misleading and unpredictable, maybe better variables could be used to provide better insights about the cost
    • Since it is a managed service, we have limited control over the instances and some issues we faced we couldn't;'t know about without reaching out to the support and got fixed from their end. So more control over the instance might help
    • The way of managing users and access is somehow confusing. Maybe it could be placed somewhere easy to access
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Neo Technologies
    • One of the hardest challenges that Neo4j had to solve was the horizontal scaling problem. I am not updated on recent developments, but at the time of my use, I couldn't find a viable solution.
    • Neo4j does not play with other open source APIs like Blueprint. You have to use the native Neo4j API.
    • There wasn't a visual tool to see your data. Of course, third party tools are always available, but I would have loved something which came with the Neo4j bundle. I love that Docker comes bundled with Kitematic, so it's not wrong to hope that Neo4j could also ship with some default visualization software.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    MongoDB
    I am looking forward to increasing our SaaS subscriptions such that I get to experience global replica sets, working in reads from secondaries, and what not. Can't wait to be able to exploit some of the power that the "Big Boys" use MongoDB for.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    No answers on this topic
    Neo Technologies
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    MongoDB
    NoSQL database systems such as MongoDB lack graphical interfaces by default and therefore to improve usability it is necessary to install third-party applications to see more visually the schemas and stored documents. In addition, these tools also allow us to visualize the commands to be executed for each operation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    I would give it 8. Good stuff: 1. Easy to use in terms of creating cluster, integrating with Databases, setting up backups and high availability instance, using the monitors they provide to check cluster status, managing users at company level, configure multiple replicas and cross region databases. Things hard to use: 1. roles and permissions at DB level. 2. Calculate expected costs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Neo Technologies
    Learning cypher was super easy coming from a SQL background. Furthermore, the docs Neo4j provides on their website make it really easy to pull up a reference, guide or a quick example. The mac app they provide is also really well designed with good visualisation tools, with the ability to easily use colour, line thickness etc to help navigate your data.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    MongoDB
    Finding support from local companies can be difficult. There were times when the local company could not find a solution and we reached a solution by getting support globally. If a good local company is found, it will overcome all your problems with its global support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    We love MongoDB support and have great relationship with them. When we decided to go with MongoDB Atlas, they sent a team of 5 to our company to discuss the process of setting up a Mongo cluster and walked us through. when we have questions, we create a ticket and they will respond very quickly
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Neo Technologies
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    MongoDB
    While the setup and configuration of MongoDB is pretty straight forward, having a vendor that performs automatic backups and scales the cluster automatically is very convenient. If you do not have a system administrator or DBA familiar with MongoDB on hand, it's a very good idea to use a 3rd party vendor that specializes in MongoDB hosting. The value is very well worth it over hosting it yourself since the cost is often reasonable among providers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    No answers on this topic
    Neo Technologies
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    MongoDB
    We have [measured] the speed in reading/write operations in high load and finally select the winner = MongoDBWe have [not] too much data but in case there will be 10 [times] more we need Cassandra. Cassandra's storage engine provides constant-time writes no matter how big your data set grows. For analytics, MongoDB provides a custom map/reduce implementation; Cassandra provides native Hadoop support.
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    MongoDB is a great product but on premise deployments can be slow. So we turned to Atlas. We also looked at Redis Labs and we use Redis as our side cache for app servers. But we love using MongoDB Atlas for cloud deployments, especially for prototyping because we can get started immediately. And the cost is low and easy to justify.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Neo Technologies
    Neo4j is a graph store and has different use cases compared to another NoSQL Document store like MongoDB. MongoDB is a bad choice when joins are common as existing operators for joining two documents (similar to tables in a relational store) as Mongo 3.5 use SQL like join algorithms which are expensive. MongoDB is a great choice when distributed schemaless rich document structures are important requirements. Cross document transaction support is not native to MongoDB yet, whereas Neo4J is ACID complaint with all its operations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    MongoDB
    • Open Source w/ reasonable support costs have a direct, positive impact on the ROI (we moved away from large, monolithic, locked in licensing models)
    • You do have to balance the necessary level of HA & DR with the number of servers required to scale up and scale out. Servers cost money - so DR & HR doesn't come for free (even though it's built into the architecture of MongoDB
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    • Positive - Faster provisioning so we don't have development teams waiting.
    • Positive - Automated backups and server management - eliminates need for dedicated DBAs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Neo Technologies
    • Positive: Less complex queries on graph structures, than in relational databases.
    • Negative: maintenance is a huge deal, things doesn't work and break, requiring lengthy restore operations.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    MongoDB Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot