MUGA is a web-based video conferencing system built to deliver a real-time communication and collaboration experience. In an era of rapid digitization, globalization of businesses, and geographically dispersed teams, the need for dynamic online meeting solutions has been on the rise. In response to the growing demand, the vendor states they have built MUGA as an all-inclusive virtual conferencing platform for seamless communication, effective collaboration, and better remote workforce…
$5.35
per user
streamGo
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
streamGo is a provider of online events, producing a range of webinars webcasts, virtual events and podcasts across the UK, Europe and Worldwide. Use cases include Virtual Events, Hybrid Events, Webinars, Webcasts, and Podcasts.
N/A
Whereby
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Norwegian company appear.in offers their flagship video conferencing platform to small teams, both in a free edition hosting up to 4 guests simultaneously in a session or a paid edition that supports up to 12 simultaneous meeting guests, among other features.
$0
per user
Pricing
MUGA
streamGo
Whereby
Editions & Modules
Monthly ( India )
$5.35
per user
Yearly ( India )
$57.82
per user
No answers on this topic
Free
$0
per user
Pro
$9.99
per user
Business
$59.99 and up
per user/room
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MUGA
streamGo
Whereby
Free Trial
No
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
$5.35 per user
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
MUGA
streamGo
Whereby
Features
MUGA
streamGo
Whereby
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
MUGA
6.8
1 Ratings
15% below category average
streamGo
8.5
1 Ratings
4% above category average
Whereby
7.8
14 Ratings
1% below category average
High quality audio
8.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
9.014 Ratings
High quality video
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.014 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.012 Ratings
Mobile support
4.01 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
5.011 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Product A and Product B
MUGA
6.5
1 Ratings
19% below category average
streamGo
-
Ratings
Whereby
8.0
13 Ratings
1% above category average
Desktop sharing
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.013 Ratings
Whiteboards
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
MUGA
7.3
1 Ratings
11% below category average
streamGo
7.8
1 Ratings
4% below category average
Whereby
9.4
13 Ratings
14% above category average
Calendar integration
7.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
9.94 Ratings
Meeting initiation
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.010 Ratings
Record meetings / events
9.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Slideshows
6.01 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
9.35 Ratings
Event registration
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with social media
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.72 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
MUGA
7.0
1 Ratings
14% below category average
streamGo
7.0
1 Ratings
19% below category average
Whereby
8.3
9 Ratings
3% above category average
Live chat
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.09 Ratings
Q&A
6.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Audience polling
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
MUGA
10.0
1 Ratings
22% above category average
streamGo
8.0
1 Ratings
4% below category average
Whereby
6.9
11 Ratings
15% below category average
User authentication
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.86 Ratings
Participant roles & permissions
10.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
5.09 Ratings
Confidential attendee list
10.01 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
MUGA
-
Ratings
streamGo
6.5
1 Ratings
17% below category average
Whereby
-
Ratings
Dashboards
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data exportability
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Online Events Marketing
Comparison of Online Events Marketing features of Product A and Product B
It is great for international use. It has good features, and the security is above and beyond. The service level if I/we have a problem could be better as their customer service is not quick to respond, but other than the occasional glitch, it is the best platform we have experienced and much better than MS Teams. Ease of use - easy set up for new employees inside the co and out.
It is one of the best platforms for attending webinars related to the distribution of knowledge related to different technologies and software and live events related to software releases and other product-related releases. The video streaming and software quality of the platform itself can be massively improved, in my opinion.
If you cannot use another more common solution on the market or are looking for an alternative to the known solutions, it is a great alternative. If you have other tools already, and just want to test [them], that's fine, but I think the better-known ones have a better chance of using, knowing, and the learning curve will be shorter.
The paid version may have dial-in. But I have always used the free version. Dial-in is typically required for an "official" multi-purpose teleconference platform.
I did have some trouble with larger groups (5+) when it was Appear.in but almost always use it for small 1-on-1 or 3 person meetings.
We are using a larger tool suite that already includes video conferencing instead of our older approach of using different apps from different vendors. appear.in has a simple but great set of features but its pricing scheme is not as scalable as we really need in a 500+ employee company.
Easy to use and very few complaints. But the usability on the front end was not easy as we had difficult setting up the contract and thus the first call. Timing was urgent and it took too long to get a rep to call us back and that put us in a bind and we had to use another web product
Mostly because of the cost-cutting and being able to access a decent feature set in the cost provided. There are other products in the line that are better performing and have better feature sets, but the price that stream charges and the feature set and usability it provides are decent and worth the price.
We have tried to reach out a few times and the cust service dept was inept. Slow to get to and when we did get through they were not bright folks. Thankfully we haven't had to call them often. But it is a security and long term concern that as we expand our need, will they be there for us? That is a remaining question. A
I have not really contacted the support but have had friends who have and this is one of the other reasons why I switched to streamGo. Initially, I was skeptical regarding the support, but when a few of my ex-colleagues and friends told me that it is awesome, I took the decision to switch to streamGo.
Never had to contact support, so we cannot give a rating for their overall support. When we noticed the audio was not always great quality, we simply educated our users to mute the mic and use the in-room conference phone which is connected via a dedicated VOIP link and had much better voice quality. The video performance varied by locations network speed and found it got much worse when the room size increased to over 4 connections.
No comparison. MUGA was the best solution and the best technology. It was an easy decision. The biggest challenge was getting a contract and securing ourselves as a customer to get the very first video set up and to get a call back on a few insurance/cyber security questions answered before we had our first official call.
The reason for switching was major because of the cost-cutting. If I were to compare them to the products mentioned above, I'd say all three of them have their own pros and cons but are mostly superior and better than a stream. If it hadn't been for the cost-cutting I wouldn't have jumped to stream.
I find Zoom more complicated to use and harder to use because a lot of people do not like having to download things to their computers or devices and Whereby is so easy to get connected with . I like that Zoom offers larger rooms, but at this point the cost is not worth the extra expense.