.NET vs. SAP Integration Suite

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
.NET
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's .Net is an open source, freeware application infrastructure.N/A
SAP Integration Suite
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
SAP Integration Suite is an integration platform-as-a-service (iPaaS) that helps quickly integrate on-premises and cloud-based processes, services, applications, events, and data. It is used to accelerate innovation, automate more processes, and realize a faster time to value.
$11,199
per year
Pricing
.NETSAP Integration Suite
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
.NETSAP Integration Suite
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAccess to free tier services does not expire while there is an active Pay-As-You-Go or CPEA account with SAP. Once a free tier service limit has been reached users have the option to update from a free to a paid service plan in the same account.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
.NETSAP Integration Suite
Considered Both Products
.NET

No answer on this topic

SAP Integration Suite
Chose SAP Integration Suite
Eliminates customizations. Easy to maintain and secured. For a true digital transformation, I always recommend a low-code/no-code mechanism. Upgrades should reduce traditional IT and infrastructure models, and true SaaS software should be able to do all this for a customer with …
Features
.NETSAP Integration Suite
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
.NET
-
Ratings
SAP Integration Suite
7.9
251 Ratings
1% below category average
Pre-built connectors00 Ratings8.3237 Ratings
Connector modification00 Ratings7.8202 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration00 Ratings8.3230 Ratings
Data quality services00 Ratings7.9209 Ratings
Data security features00 Ratings8.1222 Ratings
Monitoring console00 Ratings7.0228 Ratings
Best Alternatives
.NETSAP Integration Suite
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Make
Make
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
.NETSAP Integration Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(27 ratings)
8.5
(304 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(7 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(7 ratings)
2.1
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
9.7
(8 ratings)
6.0
(4 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
.NETSAP Integration Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
.NET is well suited for any general purpose solution to a business problem, though if we are talking strictly the framework version - you have to be more or less tied to Microsoft Windows to run it. If this isn't a problem, then it will be able to address and solve any programming project you have.
Read full review
SAP
In our case to have a such a poweful middleware in the cloud, give us a lot of benefits such as maintenance and support. In the integration part to be able to connect SAP and Non SAP applications makes SAP Integration Suite a good investment when our master data in this case is in S4HANA. Less appropriate is that sometimes the updates in production tenant failed and they have to downgrade or repair the issues. Affecting the usage of the tool. I guess SAP team have to be more aware of performing the changes and tested well on development environments and then when they know for sure that is the correct way to go with the update put it in production.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Visual Studio is one of the best IDEs and .NET is the best framework to use with Visual Studio.
  • There is a large network of support for the .NET framework.
  • The .NET framework encompasses a very large area of the programming stack.
  • The .NET framework is flexible and can be used for desktop applications or web development.
Read full review
SAP
  • Enhanced API management features that allow now the integration with a multitude of data feeds and rating agencies
  • Immediate evaluation of potential issues and configurable thresholds and automatic notifications.
  • The application will monitor all aspects of compliance and update them automatically for several jurisdictions at time
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • .NET is heavily Microsoft Windows oriented, and while .NET core tried to resolve that with MacOS and Linux support, .NET Core is still waiting for wider adoption.
  • While free for small projects, additional features for big projects can be a little expensive.
  • Can be resource-heavy upon deployment. We continuously have our more senior staff optimize the code of our junior developers for performance. Other languages are a little bit more forgiving in comparison.
Read full review
SAP
  • Provide more pre-built integrations to use within SuccessFactors or other modules instead of everything having to be custom built
  • Support is unable to provide advice on custom builds so you often have to engage a 3rd party partner
  • Works best when you have the functional and technical teams working together. Otherwise, the system is too technical for a functional user to create integration and a technical user not always understand the functional perspective
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
It is in place, our system integrators are familiar with it, and it fits into the ecosystem. A better user interface, flow build and debugging experience would see it grow, many technical staff do not enjoy using it for this reason, however it is quite capable and powerful behind this one shortcoming.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
The full .NET Framework is an amazing thing and is very robust. We have used it to create console apps, Windows apps, and online apps. When coupled with Visual Studio, development, testing, building, and deploying our applications has become 100 times easier as compared to doing those things manually before. The automation of this process has helped us push out changes to our applications faster to adapt to the ever-changing business requirements.
Read full review
SAP
The user interface is messy and not intuitive. It has a steep learning curve, and flows developed around are easy to make a mess with layout and can be difficult to follow. The debugging is also quite difficult, it takes some time to figure out how to follow the flow and examine data. Error handling is also difficult and not intuitive, it is better to let some errors leak and monitor through ALM.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
You don't often need to reach out to Microsoft for .NET support. If you do, there are forums and websites that have active Microsoft support folks where you can provide feedback or get help. Microsoft support in general is quite good as well, but not cheap. The best support is from the community like StackOverflow.
Read full review
SAP
The support for SAP Integration Suite is satisfactory. We leverage SAP support through our manage services partner. So far, we have not had many major issues. One concern, to make our rating a ten, would be turnaround time on high priority incidents. SAP Integration Suite drives our key business functions forward. Without a reasonable service level agreement on turnaround, we sometimes find us running into issues running pay, etc.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
Work with an SAP implementation partner, if possible.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
The .NET platform has a much longer and broader history than Laravel, so we chose to go with it as the support will be far superior. Additionally, Laravel is tied to PHP, while you can use multiple different languages in .NET. The additional flexibility that .NET provides in the range of types of applications you can build with it sealed the deal.
Read full review
SAP
SAP Integration Suite was already part of our SAP stack, part of Business Technology Platform, with out-of-the-box integration with S/4 HANA transactional and ERP system that we are using as our main back-end. Thus, we are achieving significant Total Cost Optimization benefits or running both solutions on the same platform, hosted on Azure cloud.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • There are few factors we needed for our custom development. Below are each of them. We were able to get a satisfactory outcome for each of these factors which made .NET platform a very good choice in developing enterprise applications.
  • Reusability of codes- Microsoft has given many re-usable codes and components in the framework to help developers do their job effortlessly. With the help of default features, developers can create end-to-end solutions and make the business operations more efficient. As codes and components are reusable, .NET reduces development time and if applications take less time to develop, they cost cheaper and you get faster return on investment.
  • Easy to maintain- Development cost is one time, but maintenance cost is incurring. .NET apps are easily maintainable, thanks to the configuration settings that can be modified without any need to rewrite the code.
  • Deployment is hassle free- Deploying software is always challenging and the most common problem developers face in this process is the existence of multiple DLLs. It’s hard to make sure that all DLLs will co-exist in the same machine. .NET framework solves this problem by allowing different versions of the same DLL to exist side-by-side on the same machine.
  • Security- .NET is one of the most secure web and application development frameworks available in the market. As it’s made by Microsoft, you can be absolutely sure about the security measurements. Hackers can never steal valuable data from your website or apps.
  • Cross platform friendly- What if you had developed an app for desktop and laptop computers and now after seeing the growth of mobile apps in the market, you want it in mobile version as well? You can easily develop an app that runs on the desktop and PDA without any issue. As you can re-use the codes and utilize the same development environment, your job becomes a lot simpler.
Read full review
SAP
  • In the long run will enable us to undeploy our on premise solution
  • As long as integration suite doesn't support all capabilities PO has complete migration is hard
  • Will probably be cheaper than our on premise solution when we are completely migrated
Read full review
ScreenShots

SAP Integration Suite Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of