Fast and powerful application development
April 29, 2021
Fast and powerful application development
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with .NET
Most of the applications we have build are web apps using Ruby on Rails, however when the need arises for a desktop application or utility, .NET is our go-to. When we need to automate data transfer to and from laboratory instruments and computer systems, we use .NET to build these out, either as a one-button utility or a GUI application using WPF.
- Speed of development - Visual Studio takes care of all the boilerplate
- Cross-platform compilation - develop for any platform
- Easy GUI design for even the least frontend-inclined developers
- Code can be slower and heavier than writing it natively
- Version and dependency upgrades can cause hard-to-find bugs
- Memory leakage from managed code is possible
- Speed of development
- Cross-platform compilation
- Semi language agnostic
- Rebuilt an application originally written in C++, took 1/4 of the time to do it in .NET
The .NET platform has a much longer and broader history than Laravel, so we chose to go with it as the support will be far superior. Additionally, Laravel is tied to PHP, while you can use multiple different languages in .NET. The additional flexibility that .NET provides in the range of types of applications you can build with it sealed the deal.
Do you think .NET delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with .NET's feature set?
Yes
Did .NET live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of .NET go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy .NET again?
Yes