ONTRAPORT offers customer relations management services that help with content management (creating and hosting webpages), lead tracking, traditional marketing approaches (e-mail, SMS, social media, direct mail), managing online payments, and workflow automation.
$29
per month
Smartlead.ai
Score7.4 out of 10
N/A
A solution to scale cold email outreach featuring unlimited mailboxes, unlimited warmups, deliverability-focused infrastructure, and a unibox to handle the revenue cycle.
$39
per month
Pricing
Ontraport
Smartlead.ai
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$39
per month 2000 active Leads & 6000 Emails per month
Pro
$94
per month 30000 active Leads & 150000 Emails per month
Custom
starting at $174
per month upto 12M Active Lead Credits
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Ontraport
Smartlead.ai
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
Ontraport offers a variety of plans to choose from based on the features needed. Pricing adjusts with the number of contacts in the database and users in the account. Monthly or annual plans are available, and all plans start with a 14-day free trial.
Ontraport offers a Done-With-You Setup and Training Package for getting set up in the account quickly. Users can also access a free video library with step-by-step instructions on getting started and using every feature of the platform.
Discount of up to 17% available for annual billing.
More Pricing Information
Features
Ontraport
Smartlead.ai
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Ontraport and Smartlead.ai
Feature
Ontraport
9.0
17 Ratings
15% above category average
Smartlead.ai
7.6
4 Ratings
5% below category average
WYSIWYG email editor
8.216 Ratings
7.43 Ratings
Dynamic content
10.014 Ratings
6.53 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
8.37 Ratings
7.13 Ratings
Landing pages
10.016 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
A/B testing
9.912 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Mobile optimization
8.410 Ratings
7.73 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
6.016 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
List management
10.016 Ratings
7.52 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
9.813 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of Ontraport and Smartlead.ai
Feature
Ontraport
5.5
17 Ratings
36% below category average
Smartlead.ai
-
Ratings
Lead nurturing automation
7.115 Ratings
00 Ratings
Lead scoring and grading
2.413 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data quality management
2.614 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks
10.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Campaign Management
Comparison of Campaign Management features of Ontraport and Smartlead.ai
Feature
Ontraport
7.7
8 Ratings
2% above category average
Smartlead.ai
-
Ratings
Calendaring
6.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
Event/webinar marketing
9.38 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social Media Marketing
Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of Ontraport and Smartlead.ai
Feature
Ontraport
7.1
4 Ratings
6% below category average
Smartlead.ai
-
Ratings
Social sharing and campaigns
7.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social profile integration
7.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Ontraport and Smartlead.ai
Feature
Ontraport
9.3
16 Ratings
21% above category average
Smartlead.ai
8.0
4 Ratings
5% above category average
Dashboards
10.015 Ratings
7.54 Ratings
Standard reports
8.012 Ratings
8.73 Ratings
Custom reports
10.010 Ratings
7.73 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Ontraport and Smartlead.ai
Feature
Ontraport
7.3
15 Ratings
4% below category average
Smartlead.ai
-
Ratings
API
3.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based workflow & approvals
9.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customizability
10.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with Salesforce.com
7.31 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with Microsoft Dynamics CRM
7.31 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with SugarCRM
7.31 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pre-Send Testing
Comparison of Pre-Send Testing features of Ontraport and Smartlead.ai
Here are some cases where Ontraport is well suited : - When writing emails, you can easily access to preview, manage the changes and go back to what you did before - When using automations, if there's an error, you can go back to a previous version of it. There are also some super tools that allows to see where a clients is on an automation without having to go through the all automation. It is less appropriate when you are several colleague that are addressing an issue on an email/automation as it doesn't allows you to be multiple person on the item.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Smartlead is well suited in many aspects. Thats why we are working on it from past 3-years or so. Running email campaigns can be a challenge because other bulk email providers do support sending email but the accuracy of landing in the inbox no one guarantee. I have used it and based on the experience I am using Smartlead. I have used mailshake, apollo, instantly, salesloft etc. none has given such results compared to Smartlead. When it comes to less appropriate: Smartlead is for sending bulk email, one cannot maintain records on the same. I have to delete the campaigns because it will pile up in the home screen once completed. Also Auto-tagging feature should be there based on the response received from prospect. If we use it as CRM, there are chances it can fail. Since it provides unanimous master inbox- I can not respond to my prospect from the dashboard because other colleagues might see my response. This is a security concern.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
My client was already using Ontraport and had a decent investment in the tool. As soon as we turn around the revenue situation with my client's products, we will be ditching OAP immediately, despite the significant re-implementation cost we are going to face moving to a new system. I am part of a high-end, professional marketing group, and the overwhelming sentiment with these other professionals is that one should run away from this as fast as humanly possible. I thought their words were just ungrounded opinion, and I deeply regret that I did not heed them more closely before sinking still more time and effort into OAP.
The software is just easy to use. The UI is fairly intuitive. The help system is pretty good. I find it is pretty quick to get my work completed and if I don't document my things well, I can always figure out how I did something when I need to make changes. When I have a problem the tech support is easy to deal with and when things need to get escalated they are resolved quickly.
It's a good tool and you can figure out your way around it, but overall visibility from a bird's eye view could be better. Oftentimes you have to open up multiple tabs to see different client views
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Most of the time OP runs fine. But I've had to submit more support tickets this year do to messages, seq.'s or rules not running correctly. Also experienced slow response times moving in and around OP.
The techs are reasonably savvy, highly courteous and want to do right by their customers. Unfortunately, the product they are supporting is so deeply flawed that there's only so much they can do when your legitimate business requirements are simply not supported.
Task management was the main thing that separated ONTRAPORT for me. Keeping things accountable. As well, I felt the campaign builder was slicker, and that the contact management was more robust. Custom fields are very customizable.
I have used all above platform in my career. Instantly is the nearest one which can compete. relying on Apollo was my biggest mistake over the years in my previous org. Apollo does not give clear picture whether the email is bounced what the health score of my domain. I kept on using the same mailbox and my emails kept on landing in spam. I couldn't understand the reason behind my poor performance until I used Smartlead. All other tools gives fake health score, no AI suggestion on setting up campaigns. Here Smartlead outstand with other tools.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We are providing better customer service as a direct result of Ontraport. We can track where all of our customers are, what pages/sites/modules they are visiting with ease and tailor our communication accordingly.
Our marketing funnel has become vastly improved, meaning that our ROI for marketing has gone up. Sales this April are double what they were last year.
Our team works better together because we all have a better idea of what the other needs and when. The tasks that we can assign in Ontraport mean nothing gets missed, creating a better customer and employee experience.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info