TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenText Application Quality Management vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText Application Quality Management

    Score4 out of 10
    N/AReplacing the former AccuRev, OpenText™ Application Quality Management is a solution to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes, offering a single pane of glass for software quality management.N/A

    Splunk Observability Cloud

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/ASplunk Observability Cloud aims to enable operational agility and better customer experience through real-time AI-driven streaming analytics allowing accurate alerts in seconds. It is designed to shorten MTTD and MTTR by providing real-time visibility into cloud infrastructure and services.

    $180

    per year per host

    Pricing
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementSplunk Observability Cloud
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Infrastructure
    $15
    per month (billed annually) per host
    App & Infra
    $60
    per month (billed annually) per host
    End-to-End
    $75
    per month (billed annually) per host
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementSplunk Observability Cloud
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementSplunk Observability Cloud
    Considered Both Products
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Cisco
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Would buy again
    55 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    94%
    Delivers good value for the price
    48 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    57 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    31 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Implementation went as expected
    45 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementSplunk Observability Cloud
    Small Businesses
    Polarion ALM
    Score10 out of 10
    Amazon CloudWatch
    Score7.8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    PTC Windchill RV&S
    Score2 out of 10
    LogicMonitor
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Score5 out of 10
    ManageEngine Site24x7
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementSplunk Observability Cloud
    Likelihood to Recommend
    1.0
    (4 ratings)
    7.9
    (59 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    6.1
    (3 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.6
    (18 ratings)
    Availability
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementSplunk Observability Cloud
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    Very slow and not intuitive; it would be my last choice for version control systems.The UI is a little confusing at times and seems a little outdated. It needs a lot of improvement. It is suited for small projects and fewer number of projects. But if there are huge projects and many projects to be maintained in a portfolio, its a little hard to manage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    Its great if you need real-time visibility across complex or regulated environments. Also strong for hybrid or multi-cloud setups where uptime, observability and fast IR are required. It’s probably overkill for smaller teams or environments that don’t have constant changes or compliance reporting needs. It's expensive and has a steep learning curve. Also, in my opinion, do not get yourself into a consumption based model. Costs can certainly get out of control quickly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • One place for most recent code with history, avoid any conflict/confusion among other team/members.
    • Stream/Workflow approach to control approval process betwen all the teams, which I couldn't find in other version control tools I worked.
    • Bundle our code in a small group (called, Issues in Accurev) to differentiate between different projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • The first one is its Kubernetes container monitoring.
    • I really like this features because as we know how much K8s is vast and to manually monitor each part of the Kubernetes it takes so much time but Splunk Observability Cloud makes it easier. And even once we integrate K8s with Splunk Observability Cloud it gives us some prebuilt dashboards which gives holistic view of our Cluster and its nodes, pods, etc.
    • The dashbaord feature of Splunk Observability Cloud, it gives us full flexibility to customize our dashboard with a wide range of predefined chart types.
    • Now it also supports OTEL, which is a plus point for observability. As now everyone is moving towards Otel and in current market there are only few tools who supports OTEL based integrations, Splunk Observability Cloud is one out of them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • Ability to zoom in/out for stream-view. We currently have many streams/substreams and unable to view the entire workflow. Zooming in/out would benefit.
    • Being a designer, I use Adobe Flash and SWF files. When updating the SWF files, Accurev does not see these files as being changed and you will be unable to promote. In order to push changes, you must totally rename the SWF file.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • You can use table-like functionality to generate dashboards, but these queries are heavy on the system.
    • It could be easier to give insight into what type of line parsing is used for specific documents in a company-managed environment and/or show ways to gain the insights needed.
    • I would like to see ways to anonymize specific data for shared reports without pre-formatting this in a dashboard on which reports could be based.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    OpenText
    We will renew because it is part of our build process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    Good: Stable system with low error rate Easy to use for simple use cases Bad: UI is not very clear for complex usage Mobile view (when logged in from phone) is bad No library for .net
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    When there is an issue, it’s a win if one can easily identify the root cause. To do the same, it should allow the user to dig deep with multiple data points and compare the data and identify the anomaly. In this use case, it’s good to drive from Splunk 011y.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    Splunk support is very quick and efficient. Pre-sale specialists are very skilled and available.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    Follow a training before starting.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring provides far superior options for anybody using a complex hybrid multi-cloud environment and allows both your SOC and NOC to work together on the same data while driving their own insights. We found other products are still in the old world view of servers and agents residing together within a single data centre, but modern apps are no longer like this.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • Better team coordination.
    • Avoid confusion by having one place for all documentation and code.
    • Better project management by having different work streams.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • Significantly reduced the MTTR (Mean Time To Recovery), which in turn has improved the end-user experience tremendously.
    • Meets compliance requirements of security policies, audit, regulation, and forensics.
    • Helps us to track/manage the resource usage on our cloud instances which has a direct implication on the recurring cost.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Splunk Observability Cloud Screenshots

    Screenshot of Real-time monitoring for public, private and hybrid cloud