Spelunk data with Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring and live, laugh, log
Overall Satisfaction with Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
I aid other organisations in setting the direction and infrastructure for their cloud transformation work and in achieving their goals. As part of this, a big part is getting good monitoring going to protect against failures and, importantly, to prevent them or remediate them before customers experience them. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring has always been my top recommendation because of the value it offers in aggregating data from many different areas and allowing them to be correlated to pinpoint exactly where a problem is happening.
Pros
- Correlating failures across disparate products and systems
- Rapidly identifying root causes or failure
- Team collaboration on identifying and resolving a defect
Cons
- Setup can be complicated
- Rapid identification of root cause of failure
- Reduced “which department is it” bouncing
- Proactive identification and remediation of issues prior to customers encountering them
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring provides far superior options for anybody using a complex hybrid multi-cloud environment and allows both your SOC and NOC to work together on the same data while driving their own insights.
We found other products are still in the old world view of servers and agents residing together within a single data centre, but modern apps are no longer like this.
We found other products are still in the old world view of servers and agents residing together within a single data centre, but modern apps are no longer like this.
Do you think Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring's feature set?
Yes
Did Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation