TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenText Documentum vs. SAP Responsible Design and Production

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText Documentum

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AOpenText acquired Documentum from Dell EMC in 2017, and now supports the enterprise content management (ECM) system. The vendor says users can build content-centric applications and solutions from collaborating on business documents to delivering case-based applications to managing highly precise processes in the most regulated business environments.N/A

    SAP Responsible Design and Production

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/ASAP Responsible Design and Production is a software solution that enables the user to calculate extended producer responsibility (EPR) obligations, plastic taxes, and corporate commitments to optimize material choices.N/A
    Pricing
    OpenText DocumentumSAP Responsible Design and Production
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText DocumentumSAP Responsible Design and Production
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    OpenText DocumentumSAP Responsible Design and Production
    Considered Both Products
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    SAP
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    14 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    10 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    14 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    83%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    80%
    Implementation went as expected
    8 Answers
    Features
    OpenText DocumentumSAP Responsible Design and Production
    Enterprise Content Management
    Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of OpenText Documentum and SAP Responsible Design and Production
    Feature
    OpenText Documentum
    9.2
    7 Ratings
    13% above category average
    SAP Responsible Design and Production
    -
    Ratings
    Content capture & imaging10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    File sync, storage & archiving9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Records management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content search & retrieval9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Enterprise content collaboration9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content publishing & creation9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security, risk management & information governance10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract lifecycle management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated workflows9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Artificial intelligence9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile support9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText DocumentumSAP Responsible Design and Production
    Small Businesses
    Egnyte
    Score9.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Epicor ECM
    Score7.7 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Dashpivot - By Sitemate
    Score10 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText DocumentumSAP Responsible Design and Production
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (10 ratings)
    8.5
    (15 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    4.7
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.7
    (6 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText DocumentumSAP Responsible Design and Production
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    Documentum is best used in medium to large institutions that can afford it, have alternate solutions for web publishing, and who have either in-house developers or can hire good Documentum developers (not the ones who know Java but do not understand ECM). It is, in my opinion, the best heavy duty ECM solution out there, assuming OT is not gutting it as we speak. That is my only hesitation to not giving it a 10, OpenText is an unknown quantity in this and I worry that they will only support Documentum until they have figured out how to fill the gap between Documentum and OT and then offer a migration path to OT with a Documentum sunsetting as an incentive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    Scenarios where a company needs to have a lot of visibility and control over the materials it uses for manufacturing, companies that are generators of polluting materials and companies that need to manage different EPRs in different countries. It is perhaps less useful for smaller companies whose sector is not related or involved in waste management and who do not have much volume or presence abroad. These may be able to cope with a customised development that contains their costs.
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • Records management: Compared to other content management systems, this provides a efficient and scalable solution. It gives lot of flexibility in managing the content as Records or Legal holds.
    • Workflow system has external plugins to connect with FAX, Mail, Database and FTP servers etc. which gives an option to integrate with any system with documentum.
    • Creation of websites and maintenance is easy. Content authors can create the pages with effective mechanism.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • Helps us redesign packaging for cost and waste savings.
    • Reduces industrial waste, ensures timely delivery and decreases global carbon footprint.
    • Helps us better optimize our packaging which leads to product longevity.
    • Overall it gives us an edge in EPR compliances due to its versatile approaches.
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • WDK framework has been the biggest drawbacks from the application speed point of view, as well as client complexity and not so natural look and feel. Yes, with the latest releases much of these features are improved.
    • EMC is very expensive to buy, own and support, where some products require many dependent Docuemntum products to be installed to work at its best.
    Read full review
    SAP
    • On the subject of our Business, we need to have Ecovidrio (Ecoembes) declaration included in RDP, as soon as possible. It is urgent for us.
    • The features feed for uploading information to the RDP should be more streamlined and user friendly
    • I would also improve the data quality part, it doesn't really make it clear where the problem might lie.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    OpenText
    Stability is a key factor as well as its flexibility. Also, any organization that deploys Documentum will have made a significant investment in terms of time and money, so not renewing its commitment can come with a significant cost. That said, the decision to deploy Documentum initially should come only after extensive evaluation, knowing that once deployed it will likely remain the platform of choice.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    As declarations will be incorporated, we will be able to have the data of all of them in one place, which allows us to be agile and save time and costs.
    Read full review
    Usability
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    SAP
    I think SAP Responsible Design and Production is usable and valuable, but there is room to make it easier for users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    OpenText
    Support is better than with ECM, but could use some improvement.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    At the time it was purchased it was one of the best, most robust solutions available on the market.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    These are some of the other Risk Management softwares known of. Although these solutions may not match SAP's offerings as an entire package (as just focusing on the Risk management side for this question) and not fully knowledgeable to their capabilities but SAP Responsible Design and Production provides a reliable system that performs well and provides the data analytics we require.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • After this product, the client is able to manage content security and due to it, the client is able to use the business process, and this really reduces effort and increases the profit in business.
    • It provides integration with SAP easily which really helps the client to manage this effectively and with minimum effort system is ready to use.
    • Also searching, automated flows also create a bigger impact and reduce a lot manual effort.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • It helped us to monitor impact of global regulations on our new product
    • It helped us to manage the product packaging data
    • It had a positive impact only, no negative points till now
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    SAP Responsible Design and Production Screenshots

    Screenshot of packaging composition