TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText Documentum

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AOpenText acquired Documentum from Dell EMC in 2017, and now supports the enterprise content management (ECM) system. The vendor says users can build content-centric applications and solutions from collaborating on business documents to delivering case-based applications to managing highly precise processes in the most regulated business environments.N/A

    Suralink

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/ACPAs can use Suralink to manage PBC request lists, securely transfer documents, and improve the client experience. The Suralink platform combines a dynamic PBC list, assignment workflow, and secure file hosting with the goal of delivering a more efficient and organized engagement.

    $17

    per month per firm user

    Pricing
    OpenText DocumentumSuralink
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Secure File Sharing Plan
    $17
    per month per firm user
    Standard
    $29
    per month per firm user
    Premium
    $39
    per month per firm user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText DocumentumSuralink
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    OpenText DocumentumSuralink
    Enterprise Content Management
    Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of OpenText Documentum and Suralink
    Feature
    OpenText Documentum
    9.2
    7 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Suralink
    -
    Ratings
    Content capture & imaging10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    File sync, storage & archiving9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Records management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content search & retrieval9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Enterprise content collaboration9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content publishing & creation9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security, risk management & information governance10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract lifecycle management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated workflows9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Artificial intelligence9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile support9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText DocumentumSuralink
    Small Businesses
    Egnyte
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Dropbox DocSend
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Epicor ECM
    Score7.7 out of 10
    Dropbox DocSend
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Dashpivot - By Sitemate
    Score10 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText DocumentumSuralink
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (10 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText DocumentumSuralink
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    Documentum is best used in medium to large institutions that can afford it, have alternate solutions for web publishing, and who have either in-house developers or can hire good Documentum developers (not the ones who know Java but do not understand ECM). It is, in my opinion, the best heavy duty ECM solution out there, assuming OT is not gutting it as we speak. That is my only hesitation to not giving it a 10, OpenText is an unknown quantity in this and I worry that they will only support Documentum until they have figured out how to fill the gap between Documentum and OT and then offer a migration path to OT with a Documentum sunsetting as an incentive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Suralink
    SuraLink makes perfect sense for a CPA firm that works with a number of clients. It provides easy access, and well-presented display of each client and the corresponding files provided. The security of the files is also imperative for sensitive client information. The format of the portal also allows for ease of understanding which files coordinate to what requests. This is in contrast to a something like a "drop-box" in which it is simply a list of files. This may not be the proper product for a smaller operation that only seeks secure file transfers on a non-regular basis. Additionally, for the smaller organizations, the cost may be prohibitive for little to sparing use. In those situations, a more simple secure file transfer options may be more advantageous.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • Records management: Compared to other content management systems, this provides a efficient and scalable solution. It gives lot of flexibility in managing the content as Records or Legal holds.
    • Workflow system has external plugins to connect with FAX, Mail, Database and FTP servers etc. which gives an option to integrate with any system with documentum.
    • Creation of websites and maintenance is easy. Content authors can create the pages with effective mechanism.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Suralink
    • Live open items list for both the engagement team and the client
    • Secure file transfer with ease and customization for alerts
    • Optimal encryption for data security and safety
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • WDK framework has been the biggest drawbacks from the application speed point of view, as well as client complexity and not so natural look and feel. Yes, with the latest releases much of these features are improved.
    • EMC is very expensive to buy, own and support, where some products require many dependent Docuemntum products to be installed to work at its best.
    Read full review
    Suralink
    • There seems to be a number of situation in which the site is down or experiencing difficulties. This makes it difficult to work with clients and obtain documentation.
    • When uploading a large volume of workpapers, there are occasions in which some or all of the files will not upload properly. This creates additional back and forth and frustration with the client for re-requests or follow-ups.
    • The email notification alerts could be stronger in how they are displayed and how the changes/updates are utilized.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    OpenText
    Stability is a key factor as well as its flexibility. Also, any organization that deploys Documentum will have made a significant investment in terms of time and money, so not renewing its commitment can come with a significant cost. That said, the decision to deploy Documentum initially should come only after extensive evaluation, knowing that once deployed it will likely remain the platform of choice.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Suralink
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    OpenText
    Support is better than with ECM, but could use some improvement.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Suralink
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    At the time it was purchased it was one of the best, most robust solutions available on the market.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Suralink
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • After this product, the client is able to manage content security and due to it, the client is able to use the business process, and this really reduces effort and increases the profit in business.
    • It provides integration with SAP easily which really helps the client to manage this effectively and with minimum effort system is ready to use.
    • Also searching, automated flows also create a bigger impact and reduce a lot manual effort.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Suralink
    • Positive - Significantly reduced time searching for files that correspond to audit requests
    • Positive - Reduced time creating list(s) of open items or documents that remain needed from the client, as the portal serves as a "live" request list
    • Positive - Integration with EXCEL for PBC lists of items needed, which removes the need for a special format list to import correctly
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots