OpenText MBPM vs. Zip Intake-to-Procure
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OpenText MBPM | Score7.2 out of 10 | N/A | OpenText acquired BPM solution Metastorm in 2011, and has rebranded the product as OpenText MBPM. It is an alternative BPM solution to OpenText's primary BPM offering called OpenText Cordys Business Process Management. | N/A |
Zip Intake-to-Procure | Score7.9 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Zip provides a place for employees to initiate a purchase or vendor request. Each request is routed for approval across procurement, finance, IT, data security, legal, and other teams, and Zip integrates into ERP and P2P solutions to create a PR or draft PO. The vendor states Zip works with Canva, Checkr, Hopin, Zapier, CM Group, and other companies both public and private. | N/A |
| OpenText MBPM | Zip Intake-to-Procure | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| OpenText MBPM | Zip Intake-to-Procure | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 22 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 22 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 22 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 18 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 17 Answers | |
| OpenText MBPM | Zip Intake-to-Procure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reporting & Analytics |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Process Engine |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Collaboration |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Content Management Capabilties |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| OpenText MBPM | Zip Intake-to-Procure | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Process Street Score8.2 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | TIBCO® BPM Enterprise Score8 out of 10 | Precoro Score9.5 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | IBM Business Automation Workflow Score10 out of 10 | GEP Quantum Intelligence Score9.1 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| OpenText MBPM | Zip Intake-to-Procure | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.1 | 7.7 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.0 | - |
| Usability | 9.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 9.1 |
| Implementation Rating | 10.0 | - |
| OpenText MBPM | Zip Intake-to-Procure | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Zip Intake-to-Procure Screenshots |











