TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText Web CMS

    Score5 out of 10
    N/AOpenText Web CMS (TeamSite) accelerates and simplifies the end-to-end digital content and campaign lifecycle, from content creation and rich media management to omnichannel publication, optimization, automation, commerce, and community. According to the vendor, with TeamSite, users can: Capture diverse digital audiences with amazing brand experiences – Give customers and prospects consistent, high-quality brand experiences across devices and channels, and foster closer…N/A

    Paligo

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/APaligo is a component content management system (CCMS) that helps teams manage complex technical documentation through structured authoring, content reuse, and controlled publishing.

    $4,800

    per year per seat

    Pricing
    OpenText Web CMSPaligo
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Professional
    from $4800
    per year
    Business
    Contact Sales
    per year
    Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    per year
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText Web CMSPaligo
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    OpenText Web CMSPaligo
    Considered Both Products
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Paligo
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    30 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    25 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    5 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    30 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    80%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    4 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    22 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    88%
    Implementation went as expected
    22 Answers
    Features
    OpenText Web CMSPaligo
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of OpenText Web CMS and Paligo
    Feature
    OpenText Web CMS
    8.6
    7 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Paligo
    -
    Ratings
    Role-based user permissions8.67 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform & Infrastructure
    Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of OpenText Web CMS and Paligo
    Feature
    OpenText Web CMS
    7.9
    7 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Paligo
    -
    Ratings
    API8.76 Ratings00 Ratings
    Internationalization / multi-language7.26 Ratings00 Ratings
    Web Content Creation
    Comparison of Web Content Creation features of OpenText Web CMS and Paligo
    Feature
    OpenText Web CMS
    8.0
    7 Ratings
    2% above category average
    Paligo
    -
    Ratings
    WYSIWYG editor7.87 Ratings00 Ratings
    Code quality / cleanliness7.76 Ratings00 Ratings
    Admin section8.17 Ratings00 Ratings
    Page templates7.46 Ratings00 Ratings
    Library of website themes8.36 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile optimization / responsive design8.37 Ratings00 Ratings
    Publishing workflow8.17 Ratings00 Ratings
    Form generator8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Web Content Management
    Comparison of Web Content Management features of OpenText Web CMS and Paligo
    Feature
    OpenText Web CMS
    7.9
    7 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Paligo
    -
    Ratings
    Content taxonomy7.97 Ratings00 Ratings
    Bulk management8.27 Ratings00 Ratings
    Availability / breadth of extensions7.57 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText Web CMSPaligo
    Small Businesses
    Umbraco CMS
    Score7 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Square Online
    Score7.7 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    RWS Tridion Sites
    Score9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText Web CMSPaligo
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.4
    (8 ratings)
    8.5
    (35 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    3.6
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    9.3
    (28 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    9.5
    (30 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText Web CMSPaligo
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    OpenText TeamSite is well-suited to large, enterprise-wide implementations where customization, content governance, and dynamic content distribution is needed or prioritized. It is probably not ideal for smaller sites with simple architecture and few resources to manage custom implementation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Paligo
    One of the biggest strengths is the structured authoring, which not only gives clean content for users but is also well-suited for providing AI content. I also make good use of content reuse, which simplifies maintenance and documentation updates when features change. The taxonomy has allowed me to create versioned documentation on our site that correlates with customers' installed software versions. We're switching over to using the API for publishing to our website and that will be a nice switch from the publication structure we've used previously. The tool doesn't, at this time, allow me to connect it to a custom GPT or create one that would be based on our style guide. There also isn't an MCP server option to work better with my Claude configurations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • The drag and drop forms feature makes publishing simple and quick.
    • Preview of customer data before sending publications helps us to deliver personalized experiences.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Paligo
    • The review mode is super convenient. Comparing a snapshot of the previous versions with the current one clearly outlines the respective changes and reduces the necessary content to review tremendously.
    • The option to reuse text fragments is another handy feature. Text fragments will be updated whenever the original text fragment is altered is also extremely helpful.
    • Managing a content's structure was never easier. An intuitive drag & drop functionality allows you to design your document's structure however you like.
    • You can also fork content, in addition to reuse text fragments. This is another helpful option that no longer requires you to create repetetive chapters over and over.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • I have recommendation for improvements.
    • It is easy to work with all the features.
    • All necessary content management tools are included.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Paligo
    • The amount of CSS/JS required to customize a site's appearance can be cumbersome
    • Product documentation can be lacking, specifically with integrations; in some cases, support offered no real help when trying to solve a problem with an integrated service
    • Some features require extensive development experience to use, which can sometimes be an obstacle to less-experienced team members
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Paligo
    Paligo single-sources beautifully. Allows for customization. Has the best translation features. Has the best support services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    OpenText
    Overall, it's a solid package with the potential to offer much functionality with appropriate resources applied. There are a few issues with the authoring interface that OpenText should address before its a top shelf authoring experience.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Paligo
    Reuse feature was the main reason for selection Paligo. It is the most powerful feature for us as now we have only one source of content that is used in all other documents through reuse. Makes it very easy when we need to update the content (in some cases at least once a quarter) and batch publishing makes it very easy to publish 100s of documents in one click
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    OpenText
    Our technical resources engage with OpenText TeamSite so I don't have direct experience. However, critical issues that we need help with seem to get the attention they deserve without issue. However, training and user resources for business owner roles are a bit lacking and some annoying issues with the authoring interface should be addressed sooner.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Paligo
    All the support requests I've submitted have been resolved in one way or another. Sometimes it takes some back and forth, which is to be expected. This is where being on a different continent becomes a drawback. Since we became Enterprise users, we've also had an additional level of help and support from a dedicated account manager in the US, and the resolutions seem to come more quickly
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Paligo
    Everything went well
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    It offers more content editing features at a relatively low cost thus overall deployment is lower in cost. It has great customer support who are always there to support and answer to our needs thus making the process of deployment seamless at every stage and offering training for working with their product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Paligo
    We moved from Flare to Paligo. One of the main reasons was the fact that Paligo is a cloud product. Collaboration with anyone outside of our team was more difficult with Flare. Also, maintaining a server for Flare content was going to become an issue, and overall I felt the Flare desktop product was prone to errors and issues. The flexibility of assigning Paligo licenses was a huge factor, as was the stability of the cloud platform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    OpenText
    The annual contract should be clearer in terms of the breakdown of user license types (system admin, admin, regular user, etc).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Paligo
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • We integrated with google analytics, now we have the proper comprehension of our audience data reception and behaviors - we've greatly improved on personalized marketing.
    • Quick publication of content across the main digital channels.
    • We run our digital campaigns swiftly.
    • We've maintained our brand consistency for three years.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Paligo
    • I am not involved in the financial decisions for my company regarding Paligo; the decision to migrate our content to this environment predates my hiring. However, I know that the migration effort from WordPress to Paligo was an initially heavy lift, but any content migration effort would be. I believe that ultimately, getting our content out of WordPress was a positive move, and I look forward to seeing what Paligo will help us accomplish in the future. Sorry, no hard numbers from me. :)
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Paligo Screenshots

    Screenshot of branching in PaligoScreenshot of conditional filters in PaligoScreenshot of the contributor editor in PaligoScreenshot of some of the integration options in PaligoScreenshot of the main editor in PaligoScreenshot of multi-channel publishing options in Paligo