OpenText WEM vs. Plone

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText WEM
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText's Web Experience Management is part of the Customer Experience suite and is based on the Vignette product that OpenText acquired in 2009.N/A
Plone
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Plone is a free and open source content management system built on top of the Zope application server. Plone can be used for any kind of website, including blogs, internet sites, webshops, and internal websites.N/A
Pricing
OpenText WEMPlone
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText WEMPlone
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Features
OpenText WEMPlone
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
OpenText WEM
8.5
2 Ratings
6% above category average
Plone
8.0
5 Ratings
0% below category average
Role-based user permissions8.52 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
OpenText WEM
8.2
2 Ratings
7% above category average
Plone
8.5
5 Ratings
10% above category average
API8.52 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language8.01 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
OpenText WEM
7.9
2 Ratings
4% above category average
Plone
8.0
6 Ratings
5% above category average
WYSIWYG editor7.42 Ratings8.06 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness8.02 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Admin section8.02 Ratings7.05 Ratings
Page templates7.52 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Library of website themes8.52 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design7.52 Ratings7.05 Ratings
Publishing workflow8.02 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Form generator8.52 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText WEM
8.6
2 Ratings
16% above category average
Plone
7.8
5 Ratings
6% above category average
Content taxonomy8.52 Ratings7.05 Ratings
SEO support7.42 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Bulk management9.02 Ratings5.05 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions9.02 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Community / comment management9.02 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText WEMPlone
Small Businesses
Divi
Divi
Score 9.8 out of 10
Divi
Divi
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Image Relay
Image Relay
Score 9.5 out of 10
Image Relay
Image Relay
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Tridion
Tridion
Score 9.0 out of 10
Tridion
Tridion
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText WEMPlone
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(2 ratings)
9.0
(13 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(10 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText WEMPlone
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
Areas where OpenText WEM is well suited 1. Improved digital/web presence of the organization's leaders globally. 2. Established the leaders as go-to experts for thought leadership and domain knowledge among C-level executives of related industries. 3. Amplified the client’s marketing and branding efforts. 4. Customer engagement reflected by interaction count on social media—likes,comments and conversations.
Read full review
Plone
The larger your organization, the more appropriate Plone will be. This is not to say that Plone is a worse choice for small websites, only that the minimum investment for a Plone site is certainly higher than for other platforms. If you already use Plone for your site and are looking for a redesign or an overhaul, I would only advise switching to a different platform such as WordPress or Drupal if your organization is downsizing. For any other situation, Plone is the natural choice for your growth.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • Easier management of websites.
  • Integrates well with Portal to deliver news, working like a blog.
Read full review
Plone
  • Plone is a folder-based system, organising content in a similar way desktop-users are doing for the last two decades. No need to teach non-tech customers some relational-database like paradigm for content management.
  • Plone is secure. It is the most secure CMS you can get your hands on.
  • Plone is flexible, and makes fast development easy.
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • It's unable to connect user accounts so that accounts are set and utilize a single sign-in.
Read full review
Plone
  • Not everything is configurable or editable by Plone, and when you need to adjust or add custom pieces in, you need to deal with Zope. Zope has an ugly, confusing and difficult UI and structure as a backend.
  • Using 3rd party products is difficult to do - there are a few different ways to get them installed, all of which take a bit of luck to get right.
  • Building custom products for Plone is not fun. You've got to deal with an archaic framework to tie in that is not well documented (there is documentation about many things, but not great documentation and there are a lot of holes in the documentation).
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Plone
I no longer use Plone because I got an internship in the web development field and my current place of employment uses their own content management system that they created. After getting to know other CMS's and similar software and comparing them to Plone, I would enjoy using Plone again in the future, but there are more complicated software that I'd like to learn as I progress in my field of study.
Read full review
Usability
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Plone
Compared to the amount of Plone sites, users and customizations we have in our organization, the amount of support requests and training needed is really small
Read full review
Performance
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Plone
Plone is very intensive in its operations, and if not configured well it can be slow. However it is designed and built with speed in mind and with proper use of coding, templates and caching can perform extremely well under high loads. It is capable of scaling to very high load availability environments with no specific coding requirements.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
We have choosen OpenText WEM against other vendors because : 1. Helped client reinforce brand image
through unique design language and templatization of collaterals, consistent
messaging, and regular competitor benchmarking. 2. Enables lead generation through
high-quality gated collateral, product videos, etc. 3. Senior management and sales lead meet
client regularly for project review meetings and feedback on engagement
Read full review
Plone
Drupal: Plone is cheaper, so with Drupal is more complex to reach the required ROI. However, Drupal has a lower learning curve WordPress: For our necessities it has a more expensive learning curve than plone. Joomla, is easier to use. However, it have some issues on security and web content where Plone is much better
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • Improved online engagement.
  • Speeds up our digital transformation my the day.
  • Modernizing our web content management system.
Read full review
Plone
  • As a development company Plone allows us to provide complex web applications in a short amount of time.
  • Plone is quite robust and reliable so when you customize some parts you do not risk to damage other parts. This is quite positive for a web development framework,
  • Plone allows our clients to spread their activities among different employees improving the efficiency of content generation and management.
Read full review
ScreenShots