The basis of this offering is the Market2Lead product that Oracle acquired in 2010. It has now been fully integrated with Oracle's On Demand CRM product and is a full-featured marketing automation product with features from lead management and nurturing, to measuring marketing ROI.
N/A
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Oracle's Corporate Performance Management suite was acquired from Hyperion in 2007. Hyperion customers are encouraged to migrate to Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM.
N/A
Pricing
Oracle CRM On Demand
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle CRM On Demand
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle CRM On Demand
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Features
Oracle CRM On Demand
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Sales Force Automation
Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CRM On Demand
8.9
25 Ratings
14% above category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Customer data management / contact management
8.025 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow management
9.024 Ratings
00 Ratings
Territory management
8.024 Ratings
00 Ratings
Opportunity management
8.025 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)
9.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract management
9.024 Ratings
00 Ratings
Quote & order management
10.023 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interaction tracking
9.024 Ratings
00 Ratings
Channel / partner relationship management
10.023 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Service & Support
Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CRM On Demand
9.7
24 Ratings
24% above category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Case management
10.024 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call center management
10.023 Ratings
00 Ratings
Help desk management
9.024 Ratings
00 Ratings
Marketing Automation
Comparison of Marketing Automation features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CRM On Demand
8.5
24 Ratings
10% above category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Lead management
8.024 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email marketing
9.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
CRM Project Management
Comparison of CRM Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CRM On Demand
9.0
24 Ratings
16% above category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Task management
9.023 Ratings
00 Ratings
Billing and invoicing management
9.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
9.023 Ratings
00 Ratings
CRM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CRM On Demand
8.5
24 Ratings
11% above category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Forecasting
10.024 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pipeline visualization
6.623 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customizable reports
9.024 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CRM On Demand
8.2
24 Ratings
7% above category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Custom fields
9.024 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom objects
9.024 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scripting environment
5.820 Ratings
00 Ratings
API for custom integration
9.023 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CRM On Demand
9.5
25 Ratings
13% above category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
10.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.025 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social CRM
Comparison of Social CRM features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CRM On Demand
9.0
18 Ratings
19% above category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Social data
9.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social engagement
9.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrations with 3rd-party Software
Comparison of Integrations with 3rd-party Software features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CRM On Demand
9.0
22 Ratings
19% above category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Marketing automation
9.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compensation management
9.020 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform
Comparison of Platform features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CRM On Demand
9.0
18 Ratings
18% above category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Mobile access
9.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CRM On Demand
-
Ratings
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
10.0
22 Ratings
8% above category average
Long-term financial planning
00 Ratings
10.017 Ratings
Financial budgeting
00 Ratings
10.020 Ratings
Forecasting
00 Ratings
10.021 Ratings
Scenario modeling
00 Ratings
10.016 Ratings
Management reporting
00 Ratings
10.021 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
I think it is well suited for organizations which are large with a lot of users so as to be able to minimize the cost of operations. Also, the organization which interacts mostly with customers can use Oracle CRM on demand.
Well suited: For use in multiple offices around the world. I was able to obtain financial reporting data from 5 foreign offices and then consolidate their data with 3 domestic USA offices to prepare a consolidated financial statement. Less Appropriate: Translating the financial value for consulting services could be a bit challenging because that required human interaction and judgement. It would have been great to be able to set up some software to be able to interpret this and let it run for all future project work revenue projection.
Several of our members were not familiar with various IT functions within CRM prior to working with it and so they were able to develop a working knowledge of IT pretty quickly afterwards.
It has a familiar feel to it as it allows users to work the data into a spreadsheet type layout with pivot tables and graphs and so it is quick to adopt.
Customization is great with a working knowledge of HTML, which isn't too hard to learn. You can really adapt CRM to any needs stylistically or content wise.
This product handles budgeting by Employee and/or Position very well. It is highly flexible and allows Hyperion administrators the ability to develop a planning application that fits a variety of different business needs.
It is great at calculating benefits using business rules to automate the population of these fringe costs in the overall budget planning process. This greatly reduces user error.
It allows you to seed the operating budget based on changes to key drivers, such as percentage increases, flat dollar increases and more detailed changes using business rules.
Allows visibility into the plans for each unit across the organization, rolled up into an overall budget for the campus.
It handles the creation of budgets with multiple chartfield segments or dimensions, which most other budgeting systems cannot handle well. It can aggregate these very quickly.
The ability to schedule and push out reports is missing from this system. If we want to mass deliver a report on a schedule, we must run it, export it and email it out to the group, or purchase a 3rd party system.
The ability to trigger workflow events on a schedule is missing this system. Currently, there has to be a trigger initiated by a user and we have situations where we'd like to be able to schedule a work flow routine to go out and check from specific situations and then trigger an action. We'd also like to be able to trigger workflow actions on one object based on something in another object and this capability is very limited.
One pain point for us is the consolidation and translation process. Needing to translate the data over and over again is frustrating and there is no visibility into how many users are running a translation. If multiple users attempt to translate the same data set, say goodbye to your performance but you have no way of knowing! (Unless you want to pull up a task audit which is not a very realistic expectation). It has the been the quickest way for us to bring the system to it's knees. The consolidation process performs in direct correlation to the complexity of the calculation/consolidation rules. So, while the product is extremely flexible, you still have to be careful how you design your rules and calculations to make sure that you do it on the smallest subset of data as possible to avoid large processing times. This makes sense, but requires some significant expertise that most organizations do not have in-house.
The Hyperion Financial Reporting product is ridiculously outdated and clunky to use. The interface for designing reports is not intuitive, and not easy to modify once a report is built. I think there must be a strategic decision to move away from it and go to something more like Oracle BI because I just can't understand why in the world they don't update the reporting product. It also requires a significant level of expertise to be able to use. Not a great solution at all if you want multiple end-users to create reports in something other than Excel. Nobody except the HFM admin (which I used to be) in our company even touches this module.
Another pain point is the amount of IT support that is required to run this thing, and again, specialized knowledge of Hyperion products and how they work is required for IT to adequately support it. This goes for application servers and the Oracle database that the applications are running on.
We're in the middle of the road because we are not sure that other products on the market fit the bill for what we need yet. Hyperion is expensive and burdensome from an administrator and maintenance standpoint, but it still seems to be the best solution for what we need. Show us an equally capable SaaS consolidation product and we'll talk again.
Compared to other competitors I find it very easy to use and learn .It has been helpful in our organisation and we have been able to manage our projects and operations well without interference.
The premium support team provides much needed dedicated customer service which we are after for what we have paid for this service. We are satisfied with the service and support and do not have any instance where there was an issue that requires escalation to get the right support team. Though the incidence of major issues that requires the premium support are less, we prefer to keep this as a safety net.
MS Dynamics was easy to integrate to MS Power BI. This BI and reporting aspect is a clear strong point for Microsoft. MS solutions seem easier to integrate and learn, but this depends on the IT landscape and the complexity of integrations in a respective company.
I use Oracle Hyperion Enterprise Performance Mangement because the company I work at requires me to use it in the Financial Planning sector as most of their data is stored in it. I am open minded and ready to use other performance management tools created by Oracle if my work permits.
This software can display in real-time when an order is submitted, received, fulfilled, and shipped out. We are able to know within the week of what new orders came in and how effective we are being from targeting specific regions of the nation.
Oracle Hyperion allows us to automate and consolidate financial data that used to be performed manually in spreadsheets. From that perspective the ROI is huge.
Oracle Hyperion functionality is extensive and allows us to perform most functions for planning, consolidating and reporting on our financial data.
One negative with Oracle Hyperion is that it is complicated to implement and maintain. It takes expertise at all levels (infrastructure and management) to realize the benefits from it.