Paligo, headquartered in Stockholm, offers their component content management system (CCMS), supporting the creation and publishing of technical documentation and help systems.
$4,800
per year per seat
Storyblok
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Storyblok helps teams to tell their stories and manage their content for every use-case: corporate websites, e-commerce, helpdesks, mobile apps, and screen displays. Storyblok features: Visual Editor: Live preview changes made on a website Component approach: Nestable content bloks make content management easy. Headless / API: Access data through its APIs Boasting customers in nearly every industry and country, Storyblok states they help thousands of…
$99
per month
Pricing
Paligo
Storyblok
Editions & Modules
Professional
from $4800
per year
Business
Contact Sales
per year
Enterprise
Contact Sales
per year
Starter
$0
Free with 1 Seat
Growth
$99
per month Includes 5 team member seats
Growth Plus
$349
per month Includes 15 team member seats
Enterprise
$3,299
per month 30 users included
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Paligo
Storyblok
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Paligo
Storyblok
Features
Paligo
Storyblok
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Paligo
-
Ratings
Storyblok
8.2
1 Ratings
0% below category average
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Paligo
-
Ratings
Storyblok
8.2
1 Ratings
6% above category average
API
00 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
00 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Paligo
-
Ratings
Storyblok
8.2
1 Ratings
6% above category average
WYSIWYG editor
00 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
00 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Admin section
00 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Page templates
00 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Library of website themes
00 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
00 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Publishing workflow
00 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Paligo is particularly well suited for developing similar document sets for multiple products or product lines. It is not a page layout application, so don't expect the same capabilities as popular applications for graphics-heavy documentation. With some up-front time developing good layouts, however, Paligo does manage to create very usable PDF output for customer-facing documents.
The collection of multiple reports from different integrated tools and the ability to provide effective predictive analytics and the real-time data results production capability is profitable. Social media platform integration functionalities allow the user to easily manage various marketing content across different platforms and the content accessibility is amazing.
The review mode is super convenient. Comparing a snapshot of the previous versions with the current one clearly outlines the respective changes and reduces the necessary content to review tremendously.
The option to reuse text fragments is another handy feature. Text fragments will be updated whenever the original text fragment is altered is also extremely helpful.
Managing a content's structure was never easier. An intuitive drag & drop functionality allows you to design your document's structure however you like.
You can also fork content, in addition to reuse text fragments. This is another helpful option that no longer requires you to create repetetive chapters over and over.
The amount of CSS/JS required to customize a site's appearance can be cumbersome
Product documentation can be lacking, specifically with integrations; in some cases, support offered no real help when trying to solve a problem with an integrated service
Some features require extensive development experience to use, which can sometimes be an obstacle to less-experienced team members
Generally, I'm very happy with Paligo and the productivity gains that I get from using it. There are a few arbitrary limitations on structure, and when applying conditional formatting, that I don't really understand. Unlinking / editing reused text uses this broadly inscrutible colour-coding that I just hate. It would be nice to double-click a component, make edits, then respond to a popup asking if I want to confirm the edit for all linked content, or unlink this instance. Likewise converting from an informal topic insertion to duplicates of its raw contents.
All the support requests I've submitted have been resolved in one way or another. Sometimes it takes some back and forth, which is to be expected. This is where being on a different continent becomes a drawback. Since we became Enterprise users, we've also had an additional level of help and support from a dedicated account manager in the US, and the resolutions seem to come more quickly
We moved from Flare to Paligo. One of the main reasons was the fact that Paligo is a cloud product. Collaboration with anyone outside of our team was more difficult with Flare. Also, maintaining a server for Flare content was going to become an issue, and overall I felt the Flare desktop product was prone to errors and issues. The flexibility of assigning Paligo licenses was a huge factor, as was the stability of the cloud platform.
I am not involved in the financial decisions for my company regarding Paligo; the decision to migrate our content to this environment predates my hiring. However, I know that the migration effort from WordPress to Paligo was an initially heavy lift, but any content migration effort would be. I believe that ultimately, getting our content out of WordPress was a positive move, and I look forward to seeing what Paligo will help us accomplish in the future. Sorry, no hard numbers from me. :)