The PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform is a talent management platform designed for Higher Education and Government organizations, now from PowerSchool (acquired August, 2018). Modules include analytics, applicant tracking, position management, onboarding, records management, and performance management.
N/A
SAI360
Score7.1 out of 10
N/A
SAI360 merges GRC software and Ethics & Compliance Learning to enhance risk management. Its scalable solutions have supported global organizations for 25+ years.
N/A
Pricing
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
SAI360
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
SAI360
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
SAI360
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool and SAI360
Feature
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
7.7
8 Ratings
6% above category average
SAI360
-
Ratings
New hire portal
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool and SAI360
Feature
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
5.8
3 Ratings
23% below category average
SAI360
-
Ratings
Corporate goal setting
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance tracking
2.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool and SAI360
Feature
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
2.7
3 Ratings
87% below category average
SAI360
-
Ratings
Performance plans
4.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan weighting
2.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
2.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review status tracking
4.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
2.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review reminders
4.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
1.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
4.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
1.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool and SAI360
Feature
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
7.3
4 Ratings
7% above category average
SAI360
-
Ratings
Create succession plans/pools
6.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate ranking
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate search
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate development
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool and SAI360
Feature
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
7.3
3 Ratings
3% above category average
SAI360
-
Ratings
Job Requisition Management
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Company Website Posting
7.22 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
7.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
8.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customized Application Form
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resume Management
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
2.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate Search
7.92 Ratings
00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
7.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Templates
7.82 Ratings
00 Ratings
User Permissions
8.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
8.62 Ratings
00 Ratings
Governance, Risk & Compliance
Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool and SAI360
Feature
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
-
Ratings
SAI360
7.7
5 Ratings
4% above category average
Common repository of GRC items
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Risk management
00 Ratings
7.35 Ratings
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems
Organizations who have very few applications and/or very few positions posted are probably less likely to benefit as high from PeopleAdmin. Large organizations who have several positions and/or several applications/applicants can definitely benefit from this product. This product is not as well suited for performance management as I had hoped because there is not a lot of freedom to creating and designing different evaluations for different position types in the system when you have an organization that has thousands of different employees and types.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The usage of ROAM, as well as the integration of external programmes through API and import functions, has almost reduced duplication of work. One thing to keep in mind is that your use cases must be very clear. There are a lot of SAI solutions, and their titles don't always correspond to what they actually perform.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Applicant tracking was a good use of this tool for our department. I think it could use a few more customization features but overall it was a good tool to weed out applicants who were not qualified for the position.
The system has some canned reporting tools that also worked well for our department and management needs.
It was a great place to house our position descriptions and provided a readily accessible source for hiring managers to make requested updates and changes and for employees to see and have access to their position descriptions.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
PeopleAdmin's internal report writer needs work. Currently, in version 7, reporting can only be done requisition number by requisition number. The report writer needs to be modified so it can create reports enterprise-wide.
PeopleAdmin's Data Mart product needs substantial modification. In version 5.8, on a monthly basis, PeopleAdmin provided us with an Microsoft Access database containing our historical data up to that period end. In version 7, the "Data Mart" contains our historical data. The Data Mart consists of over 300 files. These files are not database table downloads nor is it parts of a database data dump. Rather, the files appear to be scrapes from html pages. They contain html codes and other character data that needs to be cleaned before they can be uploaded. The files are not in a table-by-table format. Any one file can contain data from two or more tables. The format of the Data Mart makes it difficult to load the data into a database and format it in a table structure that is comparable to the Access database provided with version 5.8.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We are evaluating our options as it relates to PeopleAdmin. We are likely to renew as we can not find another product that gives us the functionality we have with PeopleAdmin 5.8 in the area of Position Description. Outside of that, we would likely be close to finding another product solution.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I've used both Target Recruit and HR Smart. When working with Target Recruit it quickly became apparent it was not the right solution for us. Another solution we examined prior to selection PeopleAdmin was iCIMS. iCIMS is a very social system but was not as familiar with the Higher Education recruitment processes as was PeopleAdmin.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Wasn't personally involved in the vendor selection process. I am aware that one of the main drivers for selecting BWise was cost (I believe BWise total project cost was several times lower than MetricStream's).
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info