The PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform is a talent management platform designed for Higher Education and Government organizations, now from PowerSchool (acquired August, 2018). Modules include analytics, applicant tracking, position management, onboarding, records management, and performance management.
N/A
SAP for Higher Education and Research
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
SAP for Higher Education and Research is a suite of scalable interrelated applications designed to support the various needs of higher education institutions, such as student lifecycle management, tuition and revenue management, grant and research management, research planning and analytics, and other institutional performance related modules.
N/A
Pricing
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
SAP for Higher Education and Research
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
SAP for Higher Education and Research
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
SAP for Higher Education and Research
Features
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
SAP for Higher Education and Research
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
7.7
8 Ratings
6% above category average
SAP for Higher Education and Research
-
Ratings
New hire portal
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
5.8
3 Ratings
23% below category average
SAP for Higher Education and Research
-
Ratings
Corporate goal setting
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance tracking
2.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
2.7
3 Ratings
87% below category average
SAP for Higher Education and Research
-
Ratings
Performance plans
4.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan weighting
2.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
2.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review status tracking
4.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
2.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review reminders
4.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
1.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
4.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
1.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
7.3
4 Ratings
7% above category average
SAP for Higher Education and Research
-
Ratings
Create succession plans/pools
6.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate ranking
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate search
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate development
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Organizations who have very few applications and/or very few positions posted are probably less likely to benefit as high from PeopleAdmin. Large organizations who have several positions and/or several applications/applicants can definitely benefit from this product. This product is not as well suited for performance management as I had hoped because there is not a lot of freedom to creating and designing different evaluations for different position types in the system when you have an organization that has thousands of different employees and types.
When I was at university, I used this product, which was quite new to me at the time. Since starting at my new institution, I've had the opportunity to learn more. It contains a lot of features and resources that facilitate integration with other systems and improve the efficiency of procedures. The software is not the simplest to use or comprehend. It has many features, making it challenging to learn everything. I had to enlist assistance.
Applicant tracking was a good use of this tool for our department. I think it could use a few more customization features but overall it was a good tool to weed out applicants who were not qualified for the position.
The system has some canned reporting tools that also worked well for our department and management needs.
It was a great place to house our position descriptions and provided a readily accessible source for hiring managers to make requested updates and changes and for employees to see and have access to their position descriptions.
PeopleAdmin's internal report writer needs work. Currently, in version 7, reporting can only be done requisition number by requisition number. The report writer needs to be modified so it can create reports enterprise-wide.
PeopleAdmin's Data Mart product needs substantial modification. In version 5.8, on a monthly basis, PeopleAdmin provided us with an Microsoft Access database containing our historical data up to that period end. In version 7, the "Data Mart" contains our historical data. The Data Mart consists of over 300 files. These files are not database table downloads nor is it parts of a database data dump. Rather, the files appear to be scrapes from html pages. They contain html codes and other character data that needs to be cleaned before they can be uploaded. The files are not in a table-by-table format. Any one file can contain data from two or more tables. The format of the Data Mart makes it difficult to load the data into a database and format it in a table structure that is comparable to the Access database provided with version 5.8.
Error Handling : Sometimes it created some issues where there was not enough explanation. But I think it is mostly related with the consulting company making poor development.
In every period, when students tries to access to the system all together and sign up for the courses, it always crashed for minimum a week. I think it requires Load Balancing.
The options we used were very limited there, I think there is more capabilities for collaboration is still needed. For example, exams, homeworks etc can be managed by itç
We are evaluating our options as it relates to PeopleAdmin. We are likely to renew as we can not find another product that gives us the functionality we have with PeopleAdmin 5.8 in the area of Position Description. Outside of that, we would likely be close to finding another product solution.
I've used both Target Recruit and HR Smart. When working with Target Recruit it quickly became apparent it was not the right solution for us. Another solution we examined prior to selection PeopleAdmin was iCIMS. iCIMS is a very social system but was not as familiar with the Higher Education recruitment processes as was PeopleAdmin.
With its many partnerships and connections with other software used in higher education and research, SAP may assist institutions in streamlining their operations and enhancing access functionality. I chose SAP because I am already familiar with the other SAP products. I couldn't think of any other tools which stacks up against SAP for Higher Education and Research
There were a lot of other platforms also used along with SAP for Higher Education and Research, I believe reducing these needs would be very important overall.
At the background, there are a lot of important functionalities reside like Accounting, HR etc. and this is where SAP for Higher Education and Research comes very powerful I believe
Cloud version would be a lot useful especially considering that, user logins are always seasonal so extra help always needed to balance the loads in the network.