PerformancePro, designed by HR Performance Solutions, offers performance management and salary administration applications used by over 200,000 professionals. The vendor’s value proposition is that Performance Pro focuses heavily on product development which leads to more customization options than its competitors - ensuring the application works exactly how HR, employees, and executives want it to. The vendor also says Performance Pro is also the only application on the market that combines…
N/A
SugarSync
Score3.6 out of 10
N/A
SugarSync is a cloud storage and backup solution designed for small businesses.
$7.50
per month
Pricing
PerformancePro
SugarSync
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
100 GB
$7.49
per month
250 GB
$9.99
per month
500 GB
$18.95
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PerformancePro
SugarSync
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
$950 per installation
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
PerformancePro
SugarSync
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of PerformancePro and SugarSync
Feature
PerformancePro
7.8
1 Ratings
0% above category average
SugarSync
-
Ratings
Corporate goal setting
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance tracking
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of PerformancePro and SugarSync
Feature
PerformancePro
8.5
1 Ratings
1% above category average
SugarSync
-
Ratings
Performance plans
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan weighting
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager note taking
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review status tracking
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review reminders
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of PerformancePro and SugarSync
Feature
PerformancePro
-
Ratings
SugarSync
9.4
8 Ratings
11% above category average
Versioning
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Video files
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Audio files
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Document collaboration
00 Ratings
10.07 Ratings
Access control
00 Ratings
10.08 Ratings
File search
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Device sync
00 Ratings
10.08 Ratings
Cloud Storage Security & Administration
Comparison of Cloud Storage Security & Administration features of PerformancePro and SugarSync
Feature
PerformancePro
-
Ratings
SugarSync
9.7
8 Ratings
11% above category average
User and role management
00 Ratings
10.07 Ratings
File organization
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Device management
00 Ratings
10.08 Ratings
Cloud Storage Platform
Comparison of Cloud Storage Platform features of PerformancePro and SugarSync
Useful in a wide range of performance management-based situations. Allows options like supervisor and peer feedback, as well as messaging and addition of notes to profiles and appraisals. Allows for uploading of external documents as well as creation PerformancePro-specific documents. We have used the system for both bi-annual and annual appraisals, and both cycles worked well. If your organization keeps performance-based records in another system or file structure, you might not utilize many of the options PerformancePro has, which could lead to it feeling underutilized.
When doing daily jobs, if you’re sharing large files, I think Dropbox works a lot better but if you have a system where you’re working within that system and you want to be able to work with that system and have certain folders that you have access to all the time then SugarSync might be just the ticket.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Interface - user interface could be updated to a more modern feel. Home screen (with widgets) feels somewhat cramped and widget displays could be more fully optimized.
Admin functions - Robust options, but the display of company edit pages is somewhat busy, and functions are sometimes buried under multiple pages of access.
Can only think of one thing. I have helped others to get going with SugarSync and they if they have problems it is understanding the cloud.... So maybe (if it dosen't exist already) I would like to have a animation of the proces with "flying" folders between desktops, clouds etc. Otherwise SugarSync is just great.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
In both chat and phone support, representatives have always been helpful and ready to offer assistance with any question or concern. Over the course of five years, there have been a few occasions when follow-up was assured but did not happen (or did not happen in a timely manner.) But much more frequently, support has been quick to follow-up and provide information as promised.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
SugarSync, like all solutions, has its place in the data storage stack within a company. The main reason SugarSync is better than the other solutions is that it enables me to leave my hard drive organized and keep my existing file trees. I don't have to constantly move or copy files to a specific folder if I want them backed up.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info