PingOne from Ping Identity vs. Plaid

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
PingOne from Ping Identity
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
The PingOne Cloud Platform from Ping Identity in Denver, Colorado is an identity management and access solution (IAM) for enterprises. Features of the products include single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, user management with directory, provisioning and deprovisioning. The solution is presented as a comprehensive, standards-based platform that allows users and devices to securely access any service, application or API from any device. Designed for hybrid IT…
$20,000
per year
Plaid
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Plaid in San Francisco offers a suite of applications supporting banks with risk management and customer account management features. Plaid is used by digital financial apps and services like Betterment, Expensify, Microsoft and Venmo, and by banks to make it easier for consumers to connect their financial accounts with the apps and services they want to use. Plaid connects with over 11,000 financial institutions across the U.S, Canada and Europe.
$500
per month
Pricing
PingOne from Ping IdentityPlaid
Editions & Modules
Essential
$20,000
per year
Plus
$40,000
per year
Premium
Contact Sales
Scale
500+
per month
Test
Free
Launch
Pay as you go
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PingOne from Ping IdentityPlaid
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsTry PingOne for Customers for free. Sign up for a free 30-day trial of PingOne for customers.Contact sales team for additional pricing. There may be one-time fees, subscription fees, per-request flat fees, or payment initiation fees depending on your needs.
More Pricing Information
Features
PingOne from Ping IdentityPlaid
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
PingOne from Ping Identity
9.1
10 Ratings
10% above category average
Plaid
-
Ratings
ID-Management Access Control9.38 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)9.710 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication9.310 Ratings00 Ratings
Password Management10.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Account Provisioning and De-provisioning8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Workflow Automation9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Risk Management8.56 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
PingOne from Ping IdentityPlaid
Small Businesses
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.0 out of 10
Square Invoices
Square Invoices
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.4 out of 10
Apple Pay
Apple Pay
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.4 out of 10
Checkout.com
Checkout.com
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
PingOne from Ping IdentityPlaid
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(11 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.6
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
PingOne from Ping IdentityPlaid
Likelihood to Recommend
Ping Identity
Really like [this] solution, it fits our requirements 100%. There are unlimited possibilities to extend the product, either by creating additional adapters or selectors. We really like the policy management level in PingFederate. It's extremely helpful when we can specify customer journey per many different requirements like user location, application type etc. As well, both StepUp and TopDown authentication flows were implemented [easily].
Read full review
Plaid
Plaid is extremely well suited to be your payment API if you're a start-up looking to scale your banking connections fast and securely. Their API is fully functional upon integration. Most end-users have encountered Plaid before so it's a trusted platform for many consumers so even if you're a new app, users feel comfortable connecting their bank through Plaid.
Read full review
Pros
Ping Identity
  • Based on open standards, we can use as much or as little of the Ping suite as we like, depending on which other technologies we've already implemented.
  • Continuous innovation and product enhancements have ensured their products continue to meet our rapidly evolving needs.
  • Ping Identity has been an outstanding partner, starting with the RFP process and continuing to this day, years after the sale. They are focused on our success at every level of the company and are highly responsive to our needs, issues, and product suggestions.
Read full review
Plaid
  • Plaid connects with 100s of US consumer banks.
  • Plaid continuously updates its software to meet the requirements of individual banks.
  • Plaid can get your company's payment processing up and running faster than traditional methods.
Read full review
Cons
Ping Identity
  • PingID has some limitations when used as the MFA for some LDAP implementations. You need to use it as a RADIUS password credential validator to solve for some of those limitations, which in turn causes challenges with our ephemeral cloud deployment model of PingFederate.
  • The basic logon services within PingFederate are adequate and well-documented, but simple features like disabling user input after entering credentials would help with some of the additional customization required to support real world failure modes.
  • PingCentral authorization models and configuration remain unpolished compared to other products, and now the features seem to be shifting toward onboarding PingAccess and PingDirectory over improving baseline administrative functionality/operations.
Read full review
Plaid
  • Consumer feedback or troubleshooting typically comes back to us because Plaid doesn't have an easy way of re-routing support once a user encounters a problem.
  • Update timelines could be clearer when they are working on updating a connection with a certain bank.
  • The search functionality for the user to find their bank could be a little more robust.
Read full review
Usability
Ping Identity
Ping's solutions are a powerful tool, but with that comes the need for skills to operate them. It's not easy for inexperienced engineers to run. From the end-user perspective, it is fully customizable and can be as seamless as you need.
Read full review
Plaid
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Ping Identity
Really good customer support, we always receive what we need. Sometimes instead of [a] solution (which have to be developed) we are receiving [a] work around, which is helping ad hoc. Then after time [needed for support to] develop fix we are receiving full fix or we [are] just waiting for new version of the product where our "bugs" are fixed.
Read full review
Plaid
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Ping Identity
PingOne from Ping Identity is the clear winner here. I can say this because the cost of their service is very worth it, and their service offers more than their competitors. In addition to that, this software is still improving daily, which only means that there is still more to come, and their Developers are giving their fair share of service to keep their software the best.
Read full review
Plaid
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Ping Identity
  • The TCO for our deployment of Ping will be over a million dollars/year less to operate compared to the systems it replaces.
  • Moving the organization to federated protocols allows greater flexibility in our cloud migration strategy and zero trust designs.
  • Operating with federated protocols internally facilitates M&A and divestiture activities.
Read full review
Plaid
  • Plaid got us up and running with most US-based and even some international banks with minimal engineering effort.
Read full review
ScreenShots