PingOne from Ping Identity vs. Salt Security API Protection Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
PingOne from Ping Identity
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
The PingOne Cloud Platform from Ping Identity in Denver, Colorado is an identity management and access solution (IAM) for enterprises. Features of the products include single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, user management with directory, provisioning and deprovisioning. The solution is presented as a comprehensive, standards-based platform that allows users and devices to securely access any service, application or API from any device. Designed for hybrid IT…
$20,000
per year
Salt Security API Protection Platform
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
For API-driven organizations, Salt Security is an API security platform that protects internal, external, and third-party APIs. The Salt C-3A Context-based API Analysis Architecture combines coverage and AI-powered big data to discover APIs and exposed sensitive data - continuous and automatic discovery stop attackers in their tracks - block attackers by integrating with inline devices provide remediation insights - for developers to improve API security…N/A
Pricing
PingOne from Ping IdentitySalt Security API Protection Platform
Editions & Modules
Essential
$20,000
per year
Plus
$40,000
per year
Premium
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PingOne from Ping IdentitySalt Security API Protection Platform
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsTry PingOne for Customers for free. Sign up for a free 30-day trial of PingOne for customers.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PingOne from Ping IdentitySalt Security API Protection Platform
Features
PingOne from Ping IdentitySalt Security API Protection Platform
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
PingOne from Ping Identity
9.1
10 Ratings
10% above category average
Salt Security API Protection Platform
-
Ratings
ID-Management Access Control9.38 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)9.710 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication9.310 Ratings00 Ratings
Password Management10.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Account Provisioning and De-provisioning8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Workflow Automation9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Risk Management8.56 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
PingOne from Ping IdentitySalt Security API Protection Platform
Small Businesses
Dashlane Password Manager
Dashlane Password Manager
Score 9.1 out of 10
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
PingOne from Ping IdentitySalt Security API Protection Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(11 ratings)
8.5
(6 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.6
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
PingOne from Ping IdentitySalt Security API Protection Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Ping Identity
Really like [this] solution, it fits our requirements 100%. There are unlimited possibilities to extend the product, either by creating additional adapters or selectors. We really like the policy management level in PingFederate. It's extremely helpful when we can specify customer journey per many different requirements like user location, application type etc. As well, both StepUp and TopDown authentication flows were implemented [easily].
Read full review
Salt Security
Salt is highly recommended for anyone who wants to discover, monitor and protect their APIs against various types of attacks. Salt should not be used as a SIEM.
Read full review
Pros
Ping Identity
  • Based on open standards, we can use as much or as little of the Ping suite as we like, depending on which other technologies we've already implemented.
  • Continuous innovation and product enhancements have ensured their products continue to meet our rapidly evolving needs.
  • Ping Identity has been an outstanding partner, starting with the RFP process and continuing to this day, years after the sale. They are focused on our success at every level of the company and are highly responsive to our needs, issues, and product suggestions.
Read full review
Salt Security
  • PII identification in API traffic.
  • Divergence between API traffic and documentation (swagger files).
  • Potential attacks with information to take counter measures.
Read full review
Cons
Ping Identity
  • PingID has some limitations when used as the MFA for some LDAP implementations. You need to use it as a RADIUS password credential validator to solve for some of those limitations, which in turn causes challenges with our ephemeral cloud deployment model of PingFederate.
  • The basic logon services within PingFederate are adequate and well-documented, but simple features like disabling user input after entering credentials would help with some of the additional customization required to support real world failure modes.
  • PingCentral authorization models and configuration remain unpolished compared to other products, and now the features seem to be shifting toward onboarding PingAccess and PingDirectory over improving baseline administrative functionality/operations.
Read full review
Salt Security
  • The platform could have more options for exporting detailed data from attackers' dashboards.
  • The Attackers dashboard could also have more options of filters in order to support the investigations of the attack.
  • The OAS analysis could present a more detailed view of the found issues.
Read full review
Usability
Ping Identity
Ping's solutions are a powerful tool, but with that comes the need for skills to operate them. It's not easy for inexperienced engineers to run. From the end-user perspective, it is fully customizable and can be as seamless as you need.
Read full review
Salt Security
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Ping Identity
Really good customer support, we always receive what we need. Sometimes instead of [a] solution (which have to be developed) we are receiving [a] work around, which is helping ad hoc. Then after time [needed for support to] develop fix we are receiving full fix or we [are] just waiting for new version of the product where our "bugs" are fixed.
Read full review
Salt Security
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Ping Identity
PingOne from Ping Identity is the clear winner here. I can say this because the cost of their service is very worth it, and their service offers more than their competitors. In addition to that, this software is still improving daily, which only means that there is still more to come, and their Developers are giving their fair share of service to keep their software the best.
Read full review
Salt Security
We tried controls offered by the IaaS providers but these were hard to manage and did not provide the visibility we wanted. We also protected APIs with a normal WAF but this was only helpful for assets we knew about and API attacks were not caught by the WAF.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Ping Identity
  • The TCO for our deployment of Ping will be over a million dollars/year less to operate compared to the systems it replaces.
  • Moving the organization to federated protocols allows greater flexibility in our cloud migration strategy and zero trust designs.
  • Operating with federated protocols internally facilitates M&A and divestiture activities.
Read full review
Salt Security
  • Salt Security API Protection Platform has provided detailed information that is helping us to identify and investigate attacks in our environment
Read full review
ScreenShots