Practice Fusion vs. SoftLab

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Practice Fusion
Score 3.2 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$149
per month per provider with a required annual commitment
SoftLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
SCC Soft Computer headquartered in Clearwater offers SoftLab, their Laboratory Information Management (LIMS) offering , emphasizing multi-site data coordination and centralization, and workflow automation, with a rules-based system.N/A
Pricing
Practice FusionSoftLab
Editions & Modules
3 signing staff licenses & unlimited non-signing staff licenses
$149
per month per provider with a required annual commitment
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Practice FusionSoftLab
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Practice FusionSoftLab
Features
Practice FusionSoftLab
Billing and Claims Management
Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of Product A and Product B
Practice Fusion
8.2
4 Ratings
8% above category average
SoftLab
-
Ratings
Real-time eligibility verification10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Claims management10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Coding10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Patient billing10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial Reporting1.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Patient Scheduling
Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Practice Fusion
5.2
7 Ratings
39% below category average
SoftLab
-
Ratings
Rule-based scheduling5.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated appointment reminders8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated patient check-in5.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-location support7.23 Ratings00 Ratings
Calendar interface1.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic Medical Records
Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of Product A and Product B
Practice Fusion
6.4
7 Ratings
12% below category average
SoftLab
-
Ratings
Charting / document management7.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Templates6.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Patient portal7.14 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile/tablet support9.94 Ratings00 Ratings
Fax integration10.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with other EMR and PM systems7.73 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow automation1.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Speech recognition9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization1.06 Ratings00 Ratings
E-prescribing5.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Medical Security and Privacy
Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of Product A and Product B
Practice Fusion
7.2
7 Ratings
14% below category average
SoftLab
-
Ratings
HIPAA compliance5.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based permission levels4.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Data backups and redundancy9.84 Ratings00 Ratings
Local mode / networking failsafe9.93 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow and Scale
Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of Product A and Product B
Practice Fusion
2.7
7 Ratings
95% below category average
SoftLab
-
Ratings
Task tracking6.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Specialty-specific workflows1.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-office / multi-physician capabilities1.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Practice FusionSoftLab
Small Businesses
athenaClinicals
athenaClinicals
Score 10.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
CareLogic EHR
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Epic
Epic
Score 8.4 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Practice FusionSoftLab
Likelihood to Recommend
1.0
(8 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
3.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
1.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
1.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Practice FusionSoftLab
Likelihood to Recommend
Practice Fusion
The best scenario is a small non-profit clinic who needs a great EMR but cannot afford one like EPIC. I might also recommend this to colleagues who are starting a small business because I think PF would be a good, easy, and more affordable to get up and running. I think this EMR makes less sense in the setting of large academic institutions who need lots of easily manipulable data and a huge amount of support.
Read full review
SCC Soft Computer
Verifying critical results via SoftLab is a very well demonstration of its high functionality. You can add a message to the result that it's been repeated and results are confirmed. Also, you can add the name of the nurse who was notified of the result. Also, you can see the previous results right next to the current one with the date it was performed. All of these aforementioned features are available in the same window making it a very good experience to verify a critical result as a Medical Lab Scientist. SoftLab has been never less appropriate to face any scenarios. It has always exceeded my expectations.
Read full review
Pros
Practice Fusion
  • Document storage- You can upload documents and attach them to specific patients. As well as flag documents that need to be signed, and assign them to specific doctors.
  • Charting- Very detailed integration for charting.
  • Reporting- We really enjoy the reports we can pull from within the software.
Read full review
SCC Soft Computer
  • Receiving of specimens is highly convenient now and can be done via two platforms within the same software. We use a scanner to scan the barcode as opposed to typing in any info. So in addition to being convenient, it reduces clerical errors.
  • Verifying results was never easier now with just one click. Patient results are verified and sent to the nurses and doctors. Also, to our convenience, a list of codes/messages are available such as this test has been repeated. In addition to keeping a record of calling in critical results.
  • Logging in our daily core lab instruments QC results and maintenance tasks have now been transformed from paperwork to verifying and enter results via SoftLab QC which is very easy and enjoyable.
Read full review
Cons
Practice Fusion
  • Have Physician Assistant as a provider status.
  • Make the notes section of each patients account displays towards the top of page and not the bottom.
Read full review
SCC Soft Computer
  • I have yet to find any features that are hard to use. I honestly believe that SoftLab is very easy to use and is 100% user-friendly. SoftLab has outdone itself as an LIS and needs no improvement.
Read full review
Usability
Practice Fusion
In my opinion and experience, they have a lack of customization so you have to constantly create hacks to make their system work for your practice.
Read full review
SCC Soft Computer
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Practice Fusion
We always get a return call within the time stated. There are many available topics on the forum and it is often easy to find the issue you are seeking more information on. When we have tried the live chat feature we have been satisfied with the timeliness and response.
Read full review
SCC Soft Computer
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Practice Fusion
NextGen is hard to use as far as medical records. Practice Fusion is user friendly. There is a great knowledge base for questions asked. Practice Fusion takes all the guess work out of the day.
Read full review
SCC Soft Computer
SoftLab is a great improvement on all aspects compared to Sunquest.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Practice Fusion
  • PRO -- I know now what I need in an EMR/EHR
  • CONS -- They have overcharged me and it has cost me money
  • CONS-- They have disregarded my legal rights which makes me unsure of keeping confidential info in their systems and it will cost me money to switch
  • CONS--They have cost me money with the time I've wasted to follow up on my own tickets that they refuse to follow up with
Read full review
SCC Soft Computer
  • As a Medical Lab Scientist, I believe that SoftLab made it easier and quicker to verify results meaning that results are available to Doctors a lot faster than before which in return may lessen the wait time of patients in ER which makes them happy and will definitely come back again when in need which is good from a business point of view.
Read full review
ScreenShots