Rippling Finance vs. Zip Intake-to-Procure
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rippling Finance | Score8.3 out of 10 | N/A | Rippling Finance is a modular Spend Management suite for controlling employee and vendor spending. Rippling Corporate Cards provides Card Management through physical and virtual card issuance, spending limits, transaction policies, and approval controls. Expense Management supports receipt collection, policy checks, approvals, and employee reimbursements, while Bill Pay supports Accounts Payable workflows for routing invoices and paying vendors. Rippling also offers business travel capabilities,… | N/A |
Zip Intake-to-Procure | Score7.9 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Zip provides a place for employees to initiate a purchase or vendor request. Each request is routed for approval across procurement, finance, IT, data security, legal, and other teams, and Zip integrates into ERP and P2P solutions to create a PR or draft PO. The vendor states Zip works with Canva, Checkr, Hopin, Zapier, CM Group, and other companies both public and private. | N/A |
| Rippling Finance | Zip Intake-to-Procure | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Rippling Finance | Zip Intake-to-Procure | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 12 Answers | 100% Would buy again 22 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 11 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 22 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 12 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 22 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 8 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 18 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 8 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 17 Answers | |
| Rippling Finance | Zip Intake-to-Procure | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | Precoro Score9.5 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | GEP Quantum Intelligence Score9.1 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Rippling Finance | Zip Intake-to-Procure | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.2 | 7.7 |
| Usability | 8.3 | - |
| Support Rating | 7.8 | 9.1 |
| Rippling Finance | Zip Intake-to-Procure | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
| |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Zip Intake-to-Procure Screenshots |









