SentinelOne Singularity vs. Symantec Endpoint Security

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
SentinelOne Singularity
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
SentinelOne is endpoint security software, from the company of the same name with offices in North America and Israel, presenting a combined antivirus and EDR solution.
$4
per agent, per month
Symantec Endpoint Security
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Symantec Endpoint Protection is the company's flagship antivirus / endpoint security product.
$29.99
1 year 100-249 devices
Pricing
SentinelOne SingularitySymantec Endpoint Security
Editions & Modules
Singularity Ranger IoT
$4
per agent, per month
Singularity Core
$6
per agent, per month
Singularity Control
$8
per agent, per month
Singularity Complete
$12
per agent, per month
Singularity Cloud
$36
per VM/Kubernetes worker node, per month
Endpoint Security, Initial Hybrid Subscription License With Support
$29.99
1 year 100-249 devices
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, Initial Hybrid Subscription License with Support
$34.99
1 year 1-99 devices
Endpoint Security, Initial Hybrid Subscription License With Support
$90.99
3 years 100-249 devices
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, Initial Hybrid Subscription License with Support
$99.99
3 years 1-99 devices
Symantec Endpoint Security Complete, Initial Hybrid Subscription License with Support
$200
3 years 1-99 devices
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SentinelOne SingularitySymantec Endpoint Security
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SentinelOne SingularitySymantec Endpoint Security
Considered Both Products
SentinelOne Singularity
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne Singularity is also a very good product.Crowdstrike is also a leading company in EDR point of view and provide wide range of services and product.But because of last incident happen crowdstrike customer are bit hesitate going with crowdstrike.And SentinelOne …
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
Recommendation of an outside consultant.
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
It’s very easy to deploy from our rmm and delivers fast responses to issues
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
Microsoft was cheaper, but way more difficult to get setup and deployed and to manage. VMWare carbon black got purchased by broadsoft, so I doged a bullet there.
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
VMware Carbon Black EDR
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
Only reason for choosing SentinelOne Singularity over crowdstrike was the cost because SentinelOne Singularity was much cheaper at that time as compared to the crowdstrike. Also, SentinelOne Singularity rating in gartner was higher than the crowdstrike which also gave it an …
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne Singularity is a far superior product to Symantec Endpoint Security, which is the product we migrated from, when we purchased SentinelOne. Symantec simply missed security incidents it should have been able to catch, and support has recently changed for the worse. …
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
In the distant past we had used iSensor through Dell. I can't say much about iSensor because we never really had it show any incidents or activity or reports. It might be better these days but from what I can tell, SentinelOne is the Gold Standard currently.
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
There is no question, although they all have pro's and cons, SentinelOne is far superior
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne and Microsoft Defender are both best of industry EDR solutions. We employ both in out environment in tandem to provided complete coverage of systems and protection against all emerging cyber threats.
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
Webroot is a great product but did not provide the versatility that we really were desiring. It allowed to us to centrally manage, but required policy-based management, and not the endpoint detail we wanted. SentinelOne's central management provides a variety of options for …
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne is definitely next-gen endpoint protection which makes it better than Symantec or Trend in that category. It prevents attacks and installs, allows you to monitor and update on the fly and works well overall. Also it is not as bulky as other products so you don't get …
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne had all of the major features that we were looking for. The other products either required too much administrative attention or were lacking key features. For example, one could be uninstalled by the end user. We required that the installation be password …
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
Compared to the competition there really is no comparison. While there are many far better known endpoint protection products that have been around many years longer, SentinelOne puts them all to shame. It is the most solid endpoint/anti-virus product that I have used in over …
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
There are in my opinion products with the characteristics that can be [compared] to SentinelOne.
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne has provided us better protection than other products we used in the past. We have also seen less impact on the system performance.
Symantec Endpoint Security
Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
I have worked on many antivirus tools, but according to my opinion, this is a stable and reliable product.
Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
The versions of Mcafee that we've tried don't really cover our small business needs like Symantec Endpoint Security does.
Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
Symantec Endpoint Security seems to be a more mature solution compared with CrowdStrike, particularly when CS was just recently getting their USB blocking functionality rolled out for macOS endpoints this year. Another differentiator with CrowdStrike is that Symantec ES still …
Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
Symantec Endpoint Security offers very similar features to the above products, they all do the same thing in terms of protecting your endpoints against cybersecurity threats. Installation wise the products all install from a central management system and report back to this for …
Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
Symantec Endpoint Security stacks up very well against the competition. One thing that is very different about Symantec compared to the competitors is that Symantec will not steal all your PC resources and will run fine with most applications. Some other AV products are …
Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
We've completed a POV on Crowdstrike Falcom Endpoint Protect and are very excited to move over to that platform and away from the Symantec protect suite. Crowdstrike has behavior based analysis and scanning, vulnerability detection, and best of bread support and managed …
Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
In comparison with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Symantec Endpoint Security has, in my opinion, more scalable file inspection/spyware/antivirus settings. Plus it is more stable in a multi-OS user environment. But it also has numerous issues with itself and related Symantec …
Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
Haven't had to use or consider another product. SES Does it all and more
Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
Cylance: (Active Engage) (Cost 4x Symantec [Endpoint Security]) Cylance is a good product but we have it through an MSSP and only have read-only. The certification and training for the entry [are] like 3 hours of videos but a smart person can just go in and look as the system …
Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
We have evaluated McAfee, it degrades the performance of computers and also the feature set were not properly working, it also lacked the key features that we require, the cost is also higher, on other hand we also evaluated Microsoft system center endpoint protection it has …
Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
Simply superior in every way in my opinion. These others were not in the market when we started with SEP.
Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
Symantec Endpoint Production is hands down my least favorite endpoint projection software on the market today. It's a difficult endpoint to deploy, manage and remove. It's a heavy client so once you get it installed it consumes a large amount of resources on the endpoint. …
Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
I have used competing software from different vendors such as McAfee, Eset, and Trend Micro. I found that Symantec Endpoint Security distributes its updates flawlessly and sends a very clear and comprehensive daily report. I also find the customer service very helpful once it …
Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
Symantec Endpoint Protection really shines against its competitors when it comes to centralized management. It falls a little short when it comes to cloud deployments.
Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
More robust options and protections than Malware Bytes. Better overall detection and alerting to security issues. The overall ROI was better for us and we felt would also give us a stronger line of defense in our overall security strategy. We chose Symantec Endpoint because it …
Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
Symantec Endpoint Protection outperformed all other competitor front-line antivirus products with more accurate signature detections and less false positives. We ultimately chose to pair SEP with Malwarebytes Anti-Malware to provide a more comprehensive security solution that …
Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
I have used Symantec Endpoint Protection for many years successfully. I truthfully have not compared it to any of the other major alternatives out there, as Symantec Endpoint Protection has continued to get the job done.
Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
Eset is better for on-premises integration. You install the administration console on a local machine, unlike Symantec Endpoint Protection, which is entirely cloud-based, and you can scan your network and perform silent installs. They seem to have a reasonable level when it …
Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
Malwarebytes and Norton Internet Security
Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
We did use a mix of Symantec and ClamWin AV and after that a mix of Symantec and AVG for our store locations. We also tested Comodo and McAfee at one point. McAfee was too expensive for our budget and Comodo I believe just didn't deploy to our store locations easily. We did …
Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
Our company has used both the Norton and Symantec systems for years. Therefore, I have never used any other system. We are so pleased with Symantec and have never seen a need to use any other programs.
Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
The company decided to opt for Symantec Endpoint Protection because of efficiency and what it promises to do. Besides being an investment which has been used for more than 10 years. For any and all problems, the software presents a solution at the time, in addition to sending …
Chose Symantec Endpoint Security
Symantec Endpoint Protection stacks up well against its competitors. It's priced very competitively. It's easy to install. Most important of all it catches viruses and prevents them from attacking one's computer.
Features
SentinelOne SingularitySymantec Endpoint Security
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
SentinelOne Singularity
9.2
Ratings
7% above category average
Symantec Endpoint Security
9.2
Ratings
7% above category average
Anti-Exploit Technology9.50 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)9.90 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Centralized Management8.90 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support8.50 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Infection Remediation9.80 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management7.80 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Malware Detection9.80 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
SentinelOne SingularitySymantec Endpoint Security
Small Businesses
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.1 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
Score 9.1 out of 10
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SentinelOne SingularitySymantec Endpoint Security
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.6
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.2
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
SentinelOne SingularitySymantec Endpoint Security
Likelihood to Recommend
It works extremely well for investigating the root cause analysis of events because you can see so much detail into what was happening before, after, and around the detective incident. A weak point would be when the AI gets a little over-aggressive or doesn’t quite understand the use case for specific tools. Our RMM tool was detected as a pup.
Read full review
We have found that Symantec Endpoint Security is better suited to newer systems running faster processors and more than 8GB RAM otherwise the client agent takes up too many resources and slows the system down. However, if you have a reasonably modern fleet of systems it does everything you would expect from an Endpoint Protection solution and works well as part of a multi-layered cybersecurity policy.
Read full review
Pros
  • SentinelOne provides excellent protection against known and unknown attacks to our endpoints.
  • The recovery option provides a fast, first line of defense against ransomware and other system damaging attacks.
  • SentinelOne requires minimal administrative support making it a very cost effective and efficient solution.
Read full review
  • The virus and spyware protection has worked well for us, catching several things and quarantining the items or cleaning them.
  • The virus definitions very rarely fail to update for the users, so I feel confident that my client machines are kept up to date.
  • I like the report I get daily telling me about threats found and action taken without having to login to the console to look it up myself.
Read full review
Cons
  • Possibly for compatibility with legacy Windows OS's and non Windows OS's.
  • Some settings are greyed out and unable to change but I believe this is to protect you from making a bad configuration change.
  • Could do better with reporting at the base level subscription.
Read full review
  • Removing dead clients from the console. This is nearly impossible to do, and makes keeping the console clean a very difficult task.
  • Poorly tested versions are sometimes released that cause serious issues for users. This ranges from browsers malfunctioning to BSOD errors.
  • Malware detection is good but not great. We are not confident in SEP by itself to neutralize malware threats. It's detection rate just isn't high enough for next generation and zero day threats.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Reliable for simple installation and above all efficient
Read full review
Continued satisfied support. The saying "if it ain't broke, don't fix it..." comes to mind. It works, and we'll continue to use it and support Symantec.
Read full review
Usability
There are some minor issues with the platform that can be mildly frustrating, but the overall performance, peace of mind, and ROI make it worth using. The management console is intuitive and easy to learn, the endpoint clients are simple but give IT professionals enough data to make management easy and simple
Read full review
The rating reflects Symantec Endpoint Security's ability to balance enterprise grade security with user-friendly workflows or advanced configurations require extra effort. For most organizations, the streamlined management and robust automation justify the high score. Management GUI is old fashined and need to be improve. Older devices may experience slowdowns during full scans without careful configuration.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
We've used it for years and the software is easy to use. The dashboard is easy to read, and you can easily figure out where to go to troubleshoot or deploy software. Symantec is there for emergencies like backup restoration or file retrieval. It's pretty low maintenance. Symantec is there when your IT infrastructure needs it
Read full review
Support Rating
Their support is good and quick to respond. The one issue we faced was when a non-protection issue arose there was a lot of dancing around trying to figure things out. This was frustrating as it took significantly longer to figure out issues. Lots of repetitive log gathers, screen caps, uninstalls that never seemed to resolve issues. Eventually, the product would be updated and the issue seemed to be resolved, but seemed to be the only solution.
Read full review
Support is completely awful! You can never get anyone to help if you can even find a number to call. The support web portal is a joke and their response time if you're even able to submit a ticket is ridiculously slow.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Use a third party deployment tool and not the deployment option within the SEP Manager itself.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
In the distant past we had used iSensor through Dell. I can't say much about iSensor because we never really had it show any incidents or activity or reports. It might be better these days but from what I can tell, SentinelOne is the Gold Standard currently.
Read full review
Symantec Endpoint Security seems to be a more mature solution compared with CrowdStrike, particularly when CS was just recently getting their USB blocking functionality rolled out for macOS endpoints this year. Another differentiator with CrowdStrike is that Symantec ES still provides both on-demand scanning & real-time signature-based detection in addition to solely real-time machine learning detection whereas on-demand scanning and signatures are not available on CrowdStrike. This means there is a doubt as to whether we can use CS to comply with some of our PCI DSS obligations which specifically require the use of signature-based antivirus solutions.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • SentinelOne has already proved its value by stopping attacks that would have gone otherwise unnoticed until much later in their infection process.
  • The Vigilance team has provided quick response to threats that were not easily contained via the automated response SentinelOne's agents provide. This has given us a significant piece of mind.
Read full review
  • Symantec [Endpoint Security] cost 50k less than other options while providing similar benefits over the last year
  • Cylance conflicted with Symantec [Endpoint Security] and Cisco Umbrella Client (All 3 at the same time) causing us to rebuild many desktops
  • Symantec [Endpoint Security] made it easy to detect where issues were and repair them
Read full review
ScreenShots

SentinelOne Singularity Screenshots

Screenshot of SentinelOne