SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear vs. Tricentis Tosca

SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear

Tricentis Tosca

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
SoapUI Open Source	Score 8.3 out of 10	N/A	SoapUI is an open source API testing tool supported by SmartBear's community, supporting functional and performance testing of APIs.	N/A
Tricentis Tosca	Score 8.8 out of 10	N/A	Tricentis Tosca provides an approach to test automation that is AI-powered, codeless, and end-to-end so it can test everything in a complex IT landscape, to ensure business processes work flawlessly no matter where changes occurs. Its 160+ technology support helps users test everything at the UI, API and data layer, including virtually any enterprise, custom, homegrown and mobile application. With its model-based approach, Tosca enables business, QA and IT teams to…	N/A

Pricing

SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear

Tricentis Tosca

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
SoapUI Open Source	Tricentis Tosca
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Optional

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Request Pricing

Community Pulse
	SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear	Tricentis Tosca
Considered Both Products	SoapUI Open Source Verified User Anonymous Chose SoapUI Open Source SoapUI Open Source is free, which is good for light use or simple things here and there. There is a Pro version that makes things more user-friendly. I also like that custom code can also be used for doing more complicated tasks. I like that SoapUI can have a process/flow … Incentivized Helpful? JD Jordan Deroubaix Programmer Chose SoapUI Open Source Compared to SoapUI, we have been using "light" tools like RestClient extension in Firefox, or Postman. Compared to Postman, SoapUI is more simple for WSDL / SOAP webservices, as SoapUI generate all envelop, but Postman does not. Incentivized Helpful? Ajay Kumar Software Developer Chose SoapUI Open Source Every application has its own features and UI design but SoapUI is also very good at testing. All features are awesome. Incentivized Helpful?	Tricentis Tosca Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Compared to Selenium, Cypress, and Playwright, Tricentis Tosca stands out with its model-based approach and low-code automation, making it easier for non-developers to create and maintain tests. While Selenium, Cypress, and Playwright offer more flexibility and are … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Again, end users do not select Tosca. The decision making that leads to purchasing an expensive tool is generally done at a different level. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Selenium and Playwright Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Cutting across all the phases and areas of testing Tricentis stack helped address all the challenges that were reported by the test process optimization performed by one of our vendors. Tricentis qtest for test management, Tosca for test automation, and Neoload for test … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca When evaluating automation tools such as Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, UFT, Worksoft, and others, Tricentis Tosca stands out in four major areas: enterprise scale, SAP automation, maintenance effort, and end‑to‑end coverage. Incentivized Helpful? Hemesh Jaiswani Sr SDET Chose Tricentis Tosca Easy to learn and less resources needed. Incentivized Helpful? Lalithanjani Kancherla Data QA Analyst Chose Tricentis Tosca My org uses Tricentis Tosca Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca qTest is the "brain" of the suite. You can use just Tricentis Tosca and can be enough to have results, but if you want have the management of executions, results and even manual test, this is your app. Incentivized Helpful? Monish Correia QA Lead Chose Tricentis Tosca There are several low-code/no-code tools available for GUI testing, such as UI Path and Eggplant. However, based on my experience, Tosca stands out as the most user-friendly option. It allows testers to quickly build and execute automated GUI tests with minimal setup, making it … Incentivized Helpful? Sushmita Patil Senior Business Analyst Chose Tricentis Tosca Depending on the prices concern and fast execution Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca User friendly interface is key to any tool usage. If the features supported by tool is enormous but the interface is not easy to use, then the product will not reach its optimal usage. Tosca scores high numbers with this regard. The documentations and KB articles it supports … Incentivized Helpful? david leo Developer Chose Tricentis Tosca Its easy to use and reliable Incentivized Helpful? juan eng paw Senior Technical Manager SA Chose Tricentis Tosca UFT was mostly record and replay and Tricentis Tosca best fit our purpose as it was easier to create modules and make quick changes when needed. Overall easier and quicker to make changes to our existing test cases. therefore we haven't used UFT anymore. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca has higher stability than Certica Solutions Incentivized Helpful? Yogendra Singh Test Automation Expert Chose Tricentis Tosca As Tricentis Tosca is one of the first tools to implement the model based test automation, it is way ahead of the similar kind of tools. be it creating and innovating new strategies to overcome the existing hurdles faced during automation like, self healing feature is quite … Incentivized Helpful? AB Atanu Biswas Automation and Performance Test Lead Chose Tricentis Tosca Selenium, Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence and ACCELQ Incentivized Helpful? Mouleeswaran Andi E Test Analyst Chose Tricentis Tosca Even though selenium is open source tool we have lot restriction in selenium. Using selenium we can automate only web based application. If we need to automate other application we work with other tools. Maintenance of Selenium code is complex when compare to Tricentis Tosca. … Incentivized Helpful? Anant Joshi Sr. Director Chose Tricentis Tosca The overall user experience and the ease of use while automation ERP system was better in Tricentis Tosca. The integration was seamless especially for SAP and SFDC system. I think the maintenance efforts required in Tricentis Tosca is very less as compared to Katalon. The … Incentivized Helpful? Sneha Gangan Manore Senior Analyst Chose Tricentis Tosca This tool covers all from functional testing to rpa and mobile testing cloud based testing visual testing and accessibility testing is easily possible. It is easy to implement start work in less time. All the testing kinds performance can also be tested and customized reports … Incentivized Helpful? Ganesh Muralidharan Global Delivery Head Chose Tricentis Tosca Micro Focus UFT requires coding skills. Worksoft supports SAP very well but web app automation was challenging. Provar is only for Salesforce automation. Selenium required an automation engineer with Java knowledge and framework dependency. Tricentis Tosca did not require any … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Good on flexibility and provided much option to cover different aspects of automation testing. Incentivized Helpful? BW Bernd Weigl Teamleiter Quality Assurance Chose Tricentis Tosca Best Module and Scan approach, Libs rule, and PL Libs are the best things ever! Incentivized Helpful? Nikhil Puniyani Software Engineer Chose Tricentis Tosca As our product required wide rage of testing start from web testing to desktop automation also, we gone through the feature provided by Tosca and decided it will be good fit for end to end automation. Even though from our team no one is aware of how to use the tools, the guide … Incentivized Helpful? Vinayak Bandewar Test Architect Chose Tricentis Tosca Other tools are focused on limited applications or technologies. With Tricentis Tosca you can do almost everything which makes it one-stop solution for all needs.Tosca is codeless vs others which requires coding. Tosca has inbuilt repository which other tools lack. Tosca also … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis Tosca Tricentis Tosca provides a uniform interface for al testers and avoids the requirement for coding. Tricentis Tosca also offers test capabilities across the enterprise that other tools do not. Incentivized Helpful?

Features

SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear

Tricentis Tosca

Automation Testing

Comparison of Automation Testing features of Product A and Product B
	SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear - Ratings	Tricentis Tosca 7.2 Ratings 15% below category average
Record and Automate	00 Ratings	7.40 Ratings
Multi-Browser Testing	00 Ratings	8.40 Ratings
Mobile Testing	00 Ratings	7.00 Ratings
Test Scheduling	00 Ratings	7.60 Ratings
Test Management	00 Ratings	8.10 Ratings
CI/CD Tool Integration	00 Ratings	8.20 Ratings
Integrated Version Control	00 Ratings	1.00 Ratings
Parallel Testing	00 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Object Recognition	00 Ratings	7.90 Ratings
Data-Driven Testing	00 Ratings	7.90 Ratings
Real Device Testing	00 Ratings	7.60 Ratings
Testing Reports & Analytics	00 Ratings	7.90 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear	Tricentis Tosca
Small Businesses	BrowserStack Score 8.4 out of 10	BrowserStack Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	ReadyAPI Score 6.1 out of 10	ReadyAPI Score 6.1 out of 10
Enterprises	ReadyAPI Score 6.1 out of 10	ignio AIOps Score 8.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear	Tricentis Tosca
Likelihood to Recommend	8.0 (0 ratings)	8.9 (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	- (0 ratings)	9.4 (0 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	8.6 (0 ratings)
Availability	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)
Performance	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)
In-Person Training	- (0 ratings)	8.0 (0 ratings)
Implementation Rating	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)
Configurability	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)
Ease of integration	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)
Product Scalability	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear	Tricentis Tosca
Likelihood to Recommend	If you are making system upgrade project and you have existing system working and you want to imitate messages that are going in production but without making any data loads or switch it’s very suitable and convenient software. It serves well in manual test scenarios but wouldn’t be as good in case of mass tests. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	I still love to test some desktop applications as well as API's with Tosca. For web applications Tosca is OK but there are better alternatives. As a user, Tosca is really great to work with as you can set up a clean project quite fast. It is also quite easy to make a mess as a non-experienced user, using configurations (but in the wrong way), using TCD (but in the wrong way). It would help if there was more focus on generic test automation fundamentals, many more clear examples and instead of just mentioning the best practices, make users really understand the best practices so they know how and when to (not) apply them. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	SOAP REST Authentication Incentivized JD Jordan Deroubaix Programmer Read full review	It's one stop shop for all your test automation needs like - api layer, ui layer, load testing, mobile automation. It has excellent support for CI/CD and Devops environment which makes it very modern but much needed solution It can run in cross browser and cross devices with same test script and again saves a lot of time. Excellent results and dashboards gives nice view into results. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	I actually like SoapUI as it is, I have not found things to improve, except for the speed of response is very complex services. Incentivized Abraham García Web Development Manager Read full review	Documentation - struggled multiple times with features not explained very well, or not explained at all The only support is on Tricentis Forums, where, sometimes, based on 'luck' - you will open a support case, and wait few days until you get the chance to speak with someone from Tricentis and show case your issue Incentivized AI Alexandru Cristian Ion QA Engineer Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	No answers on this topic	Tricentis Tosca has consistently delivered value through its model‑based, low‑code automation, strong SAP ECC/S/4HANA and Fiori support, and the ability to reuse test assets across regression, upgrades, and transformation projects. Its coverage across SAP, Web, APIs, and desktop within a single platform reduces tool sprawl and maintenance effort, while features like risk‑based testing, CI/CD integration, and business‑readable tests align well with our quality and release goals Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	No answers on this topic	It can be a challenge for new users who have never used an automation tool. For example, it is hard to understand the layout of the screen and where to find how to update the data. The interface can be overwhelming at first. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	No answers on this topic	Tricentis team was very supportive. Support is expensive but they helped us at many level. Setting up timeline, implementation, precise questions on automation challenges. We had an account manager and technical people we could as to talk to. Support was generally timely and helping. They often proposed to come on site to help us which would cost more but could be helpful Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
In-Person Training	No answers on this topic	It would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is better Incentivized david leo Developer Read full review
Online Training	No answers on this topic	okIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is better Incentivized david leo Developer Read full review
Alternatives Considered	SoapUI Open Source is free, which is good for light use or simple things here and there. There is a Pro version that makes things more user-friendly. I also like that custom code can also be used for doing more complicated tasks. I like that SoapUI can have a process/flow (conditional/loop/waits/etc.) set up for scripting purposes, which is good for beginners and light users. However, I think the user interface has room for improvement. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	User friendly interface is key to any tool usage. If the features supported by tool is enormous but the interface is not easy to use, then the product will not reach its optimal usage. Tosca scores high numbers with this regard. The documentations and KB articles it supports are very helpful and allows us to solve our issues independently. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Testing resolves most of the issues in the development phases. User friendliness of the app makes it good. Overall client happiness depends on the clean project, which is possible by testing. Incentivized Ajay Kumar Software Developer Read full review	Faster testing cycles - We were able to run around 4000 test cases in a week for a large workday implementation for multiple cycles. Increased risk coverage - We were able to increase regression coverage to 70% from scratch. Increased automation rates - High number of automation rates were achieved. Incentivized Vinayak Bandewar Test Architect Read full review
ScreenShots		Tricentis Tosca Screenshots