TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Stack Overflow for Teams

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AStack Overflow for Teams is a team knowledge management and Q & A platform for development billed per teammate, featuring roles and permissions, and integrations with popularly used collaboration tools.

    $7

    per month per teammate (up to 250 teammates)

    Wipster

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/ANew Zealand based Wipster offers their video publishing and analytics platform that supports marketing teams with publishing data, view and engagement data, and detailed metadata, contained within an organized media asset library.N/A
    Pricing
    Stack Overflow for TeamsWipster
    Editions & Modules
    Basic
    $7
    per month per teammate (up to 250 teammates)
    Business
    $14
    per month per teammate (unlimited)
    Enterprise
    Custom
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Stack Overflow for TeamsWipster
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Stack Overflow for TeamsWipster
    Considered Both Products
    Stack Overflow
    No answer on this topic
    Wipster
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    90%
    Would buy again
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    10 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    90%
    Happy with the feature set
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    71%
    Implementation went as expected
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Best Alternatives
    Stack Overflow for TeamsWipster
    Small Businesses
    Slite
    Score5.8 out of 10
    Vyond
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Bloomfire
    Score8.4 out of 10
    Vyond
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Bloomfire
    Score8.4 out of 10
    Vyond
    Score8.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Stack Overflow for TeamsWipster
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (10 ratings)
    7.0
    (4 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.5
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Stack Overflow for TeamsWipster
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Stack Overflow
    In my opinion, Stack Overflow for Teams is well suited for an organization that is on a hiring spree for the engineering teams. The reason for it is because instead of catering to doubts of new joinees individually, they can be asked to refer to the Stack Overflow and hence will save a lot of time for both new joiners as well as the existing employees.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wipster
    I actively talk about Wipster and show off how I'm able to get so much done with my clients because of this tool all of the time! If you own or work at a digital agency, it's a must! I'm using Wipster for short and long-form media, it just makes everything so much easier for me.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Stack Overflow
    • Sharing technical solutions to problems we encounter in our internal development environment.
    • Sharing best practices we find in external resources.
    • Discussions on design patterns and conventions we can use in our projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wipster
    • Wipster was one of the first applications to allow for frame-by-frame video feedback. This provided a unique opportunity to make feedback far more intelligible than before. Before Wipster, we needed to reference phone calls, notes, emails, and messages, as well as communicate verbally with our project managers. A lot of information can get lost this way, but Wipster places the feedback directly with the video, which makes it super easy to understand what the client desires for their video to look like.
    • Wipster allows for a client to select a location on a frame where their feedback is referencing. It's fairly archaic, but it works. Client feedback sits next to the playback window so it's somewhat easy to reference what the client wants.
    • Wipster also allows for integration with editing software like Premiere Pro, which speeds up the editing process as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Stack Overflow
    • I would recommend an increased engineering focus on the Microsoft Teams integration.
    • It would be nice to make more medals.
    • Easier ways to earn points.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wipster
    • There is sometimes a lag when navigating a timeline/leaving comments, which makes me wonder if actions are being recorded correctly.
    • The admin interface seems to be slower than it should be.
    • There's no closed captioning feature as far as I know (some of our clients are deaf/hard of hearing).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Stack Overflow
    No answers on this topic
    Wipster
    Wipster has become a must-have tool to do my job!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Stack Overflow
    No answers on this topic
    Wipster
    While the technical issues we have encountered with Wipster have been very low in the time we've used the service, the few instances where we have needed assistance were met promptly and effectively by Wipster's Support Team. This support even extended all the way from the platform's founder, as I received help from him, which really impressed me.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Stack Overflow
    It's easier to use Stack Overflow for Teams Q&A to maintain our knowledge base over time, over the Confluence wikis that we also maintain. You don't need to bother about folders, filenames, templates - just ask a question and answer it or get it answered. It feels less formal, so developers feel more free to add content.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wipster
    After my experience with Wipster at my old job, when I started a business I knew I needed to look into alternatives. Despite the areas it failed, Wipster still made it easier to do my job. At this point, I've switched to Frame.io and it's hard to look elsewhere. Frame.io does everything Wipster does but heaps better. It's easier to use, easier to organize, cleaner interface, and accomplishes my goals at a reasonable cost to the business.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Stack Overflow
    • It makes the search for answers more efficient, so devs can focus in more important things.
    • Knowledge is not lost, even if people leave the company.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wipster
    • No calculation I have noted but too many intangible benefits after using it , over all that is ROI
    • I don't remember any negative feedback but in-app , working is very tricky
    • customer supper and media management is good
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots