TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)

    Score9.2 out of 10
    N/ASugar Sell from SugarCRM is a collaborative CRM, allowing users to track and monitor activities, map each customer’s journey. Sugar Sell replaces former editions of the SugarCRM product, including the SugarCRM Community Edition, the open source edition, which is discontinued.

    $19

    per month per user (3 users minimum, billed annually)

    Slate for Admissions

    Score7.6 out of 10
    N/ASlate is a platform for admissions and enrollment management, student success, and alumni/advancement, from Technolutions in New Haven. Designed and developed exclusively for higher education, Slate by Technolutions supports the student and donor lifecycle, and provides a unified interface to CRM, outreach and communications, travel management, online applications, online reading, student success and retention, and alumni and donor engagement.N/A
    Pricing
    Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)Slate for Admissions
    Editions & Modules
    Essentials
    $19
    per month (billed annually) per user (3 user minimum, 9 user maximum)
    Standard
    $59
    per month (billed annually) per user (10 User Minimum)
    Advanced
    $85
    per month (billed annually) per user (10 user minimum)
    Premier
    $135
    per month (billed annually) per user (10 user minimum)
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)Slate for Admissions
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)Slate for Admissions
    Considered Both Products
    SugarCRM
    No answer on this topic
    Technolutions
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    70%
    Would buy again
    7 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    6 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    86%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    80%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    80%
    Implementation went as expected
    4 Answers
    80%
    Implementation went as expected
    4 Answers
    Features
    Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)Slate for Admissions
    Sales Force Automation
    Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of Sugar Sell (SugarCRM) and Slate for Admissions
    Feature
    Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
    4.8
    33 Ratings
    48% below category average
    Slate for Admissions
    -
    Ratings
    Customer data management / contact management5.032 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow management6.028 Ratings00 Ratings
    Territory management6.026 Ratings00 Ratings
    Opportunity management7.026 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)7.029 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract management3.026 Ratings00 Ratings
    Quote & order management4.024 Ratings00 Ratings
    Interaction tracking3.030 Ratings00 Ratings
    Channel / partner relationship management2.025 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customer Service & Support
    Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of Sugar Sell (SugarCRM) and Slate for Admissions
    Feature
    Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
    2.3
    24 Ratings
    108% below category average
    Slate for Admissions
    -
    Ratings
    Case management3.024 Ratings00 Ratings
    Call center management2.019 Ratings00 Ratings
    Help desk management2.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Marketing Automation
    Comparison of Marketing Automation features of Sugar Sell (SugarCRM) and Slate for Admissions
    Feature
    Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
    5.5
    25 Ratings
    34% below category average
    Slate for Admissions
    -
    Ratings
    Lead management6.022 Ratings00 Ratings
    Email marketing5.023 Ratings00 Ratings
    CRM Project Management
    Comparison of CRM Project Management features of Sugar Sell (SugarCRM) and Slate for Admissions
    Feature
    Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
    3.0
    28 Ratings
    88% below category average
    Slate for Admissions
    -
    Ratings
    Task management4.026 Ratings00 Ratings
    Billing and invoicing management3.018 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting2.024 Ratings00 Ratings
    CRM Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of Sugar Sell (SugarCRM) and Slate for Admissions
    Feature
    Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
    3.3
    28 Ratings
    79% below category average
    Slate for Admissions
    -
    Ratings
    Forecasting3.024 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pipeline visualization2.025 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customizable reports5.027 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customization
    Comparison of Customization features of Sugar Sell (SugarCRM) and Slate for Admissions
    Feature
    Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
    5.5
    29 Ratings
    33% below category average
    Slate for Admissions
    -
    Ratings
    Custom fields6.029 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom objects5.026 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scripting environment6.019 Ratings00 Ratings
    API for custom integration5.025 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of Sugar Sell (SugarCRM) and Slate for Admissions
    Feature
    Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
    5.5
    27 Ratings
    42% below category average
    Slate for Admissions
    -
    Ratings
    Single sign-on capability5.021 Ratings00 Ratings
    Role-based user permissions6.026 Ratings00 Ratings
    Social CRM
    Comparison of Social CRM features of Sugar Sell (SugarCRM) and Slate for Admissions
    Feature
    Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
    3.0
    19 Ratings
    86% below category average
    Slate for Admissions
    -
    Ratings
    Social data3.019 Ratings00 Ratings
    Social engagement3.016 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrations with 3rd-party Software
    Comparison of Integrations with 3rd-party Software features of Sugar Sell (SugarCRM) and Slate for Admissions
    Feature
    Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
    4.5
    19 Ratings
    50% below category average
    Slate for Admissions
    -
    Ratings
    Marketing automation5.019 Ratings00 Ratings
    Compensation management4.013 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform
    Comparison of Platform features of Sugar Sell (SugarCRM) and Slate for Admissions
    Feature
    Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
    4.0
    20 Ratings
    62% below category average
    Slate for Admissions
    -
    Ratings
    Mobile access4.020 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)Slate for Admissions
    Small Businesses
    Salesflare
    Score10 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Kintone
    Score9.7 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Oracle Sales
    Score8.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)Slate for Admissions
    Likelihood to Recommend
    2.0
    (59 ratings)
    10.0
    (9 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.2
    (26 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    3.0
    (10 ratings)
    7.2
    (2 ratings)
    Availability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.1
    (12 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)Slate for Admissions
    Likelihood to Recommend
    SugarCRM
    Sugar CRM is a good tool, but it's complex to customize. It often requires expensive 3rd partners to implement more complex scenarios that SugarCRM struggles to support; coming back with explanations was usually time-consuming and unsupported. The back end is overly complex in terms of what it needs to be, with many redundant database tables and columns.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Technolutions
    I would recommend Slate, by Technolutions for any higher education institution, big or small. Though there is a higher cost associated with Slate than most other options, it's well worth the price. The level of detail that you're able to gather, maintain, and query on within your student data is far beyond anything I've experienced with other systems. These insights help you pinpoint areas for action and improvement so that you can pivot when necessary, helping you reach your enrollment goals quicker and more efficiently.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    SugarCRM
    • Great way to keep myself organized. I do not miss appointments with clients since within the system I can input my appointment time and also send out a reminder to my clients.
    • It has a nice layout [that] does not seem to be cluttered. I find it to be very user friendly.
    • It has customizable dashboards which I find beneficial
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Technolutions
    • Managing contacts.
    • Smart communications (drip email campaigns).
    • Real-time data management.
    • End-to-end control of product (or instance of).
    • Allows for easy to implement segmentation via smart rules and queries (data sets).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    SugarCRM
    • The back-end programming (logical hooks) for advanced customizations could benefit from a more user-friendly interface
    • General layout could be improved by the addition of modern templates to customize the standard look and feel
    • Support communities could be further improved with the addition of videos on how to do specific configuration, modules.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Technolutions
    • Being able to have students register at an event without needing a wifi network
    • Easier way to update records for individuals who move to a different organization
    • Being able to start an application first without needing to immediately set up a user name and password.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    SugarCRM
    Our organization will continue to use Sugar as long as it remains cost effective and it addresses the majority of our needs. I will, however, recommend looking into other options once our needs increase and there is additional budget for some bigger named and more robust platform options. I feel if the application was friendlier to end users we would get better productivity as well.
    Read full review
    Technolutions
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    SugarCRM
    There's a learning curve associated with Sugar. Right away, it's not as easy as an out-of-the-box CRM. Once you learn how to use Sugar, the system fits what your needs are. With any other CRM, you'd be trying to figure out how your company can best fit the CRM. You don't want to change your business cycle for your CRM, the CRM should fit your business cycle.
    Read full review
    Technolutions
    It's incredibly usable and easy to figure out. It's modern and does exactly what we need for it to do
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    SugarCRM
    SugarCRM has never been down for us.
    Read full review
    Technolutions
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    SugarCRM
    No response time issues ever. Very productive due to its ease of use.
    Read full review
    Technolutions
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    SugarCRM
    The support overall at least for us has been phenomenal. Anytime that the system has any Issues at all IT gets in contact from someone from support to get the system back up and running. Have never gone more than 30 minutes with the system not working. So overall I will be definetely recommending this system in any other company that I may work for in the future.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Technolutions
    While I do wish they had actual representatives that we able to come to you for trainings for implementation and new users, I understand that a big draw is the money that is saved by instead investing in knowledgebase, which is it's online tutorials for different functions of Slate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    SugarCRM
    We feel clasroom training is essential to ensure user adoption and buy-in. Video and on-line training courses gave their place but being in a classroom setting enables the Team to make any potential CRM issues visble right up front.
    Read full review
    Technolutions
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    SugarCRM
    Only part of an implemementation as noted previously.
    Read full review
    Technolutions
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    SugarCRM
    Study, study, and study. Be prepared to train everyday until all processes are flowing nicely. The CRM is the elephant and figuring out where to take the first bite can be a challenge. But there is only one way to eat this elephant, one bite at a time. Systematic planning is very important.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Technolutions
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    SugarCRM
    SugarCRM is a lot better in many ways then LogicsCRM which I started using when I started as a sales rep at Community Tax. Yet there is still room for a lot of improvements to accommodate a steady workflow. They integration of old CRM files seems to have worked great from Logics to Sugar.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Technolutions
    We had been on Recruitment Plus- it has been sunsetted, so we were forced to move. I also looked at Fire Engine Red. Slate seemed far and away the most robust CRM/Admissions solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    SugarCRM
    Works from 2-300 Users in our experience.
    Read full review
    Technolutions
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    SugarCRM
    • Overall seems to be more expensive than other subscription based CRMs.
    • Has positively impact our sales team to make more efficient and accountability among sales teams. Also allows for high level aggregated reporting
    • Has been impactful for all teams, not only sales to track individual activity on a daily, weekly, monthly and quarterly basis
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Technolutions
    • We aren't really a business, per se, but a nonprofit university. However, Slate[, by Technolutions] does allow us to easily sort applications into categories for different departments to review. And it provides a clear trail of who is looking at various documents when--and how long it takes to process them.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Sugar Sell (SugarCRM) Screenshots

    Screenshot of a view of Sugar Sell's contacts listScreenshot of Sugar Sell's analyticsScreenshot of a Sugar Sell dashboard