TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cyfe

    Score4 out of 10
    N/ACyfe is all-in-one dashboard software for analyzing data from online services like Google Analytics, Salesforce, AdSense, MailChimp, Amazon, Facebook, etc, from Traject.

    $29

    per month

    Mathematica

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AWolfram's flagship product Mathematica is a modern technical computing application featuring a flexible symbolic coding language and a wide array of graphing and data visualization capabilities.

    $1,520

    per year

    Pricing
    CyfeMathematica
    Editions & Modules
    Starter
    $29
    per month
    Standard
    $39
    per month
    Pro
    $65
    per month
    Premier
    $119
    per month
    Standard Cloud
    $1,520
    per year
    Standard Desktop
    $3,040
    one-time fee
    Standard Desktop & Cloud
    $3,344
    one-time fee
    Mathematica Enterprise Edition
    $8,150.00
    one-time fee
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CyfeMathematica
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Discounts available for students and educational institutions. The Network Edition reduce per-user license costs through shared deployment across any number of machines on a local-area network.
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    CyfeMathematica
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Cyfe, by Traject and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Cyfe, by Traject
    6.6
    28 Ratings
    21% below category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    9.9
    6 Ratings
    20% above category average
    Pixel Perfect reports6.817 Ratings9.84 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards4.028 Ratings9.94 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates9.120 Ratings9.96 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Cyfe, by Traject and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Cyfe, by Traject
    7.2
    26 Ratings
    11% below category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    9.9
    9 Ratings
    23% above category average
    Drill-down analysis8.715 Ratings9.98 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities8.120 Ratings9.98 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages10.09 Ratings9.97 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration2.026 Ratings9.99 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Cyfe, by Traject and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Cyfe, by Traject
    5.0
    23 Ratings
    49% below category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    9.3
    8 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Publish to Web4.015 Ratings9.97 Ratings
    Publish to PDF4.021 Ratings9.08 Ratings
    Report Versioning6.89 Ratings9.97 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling1.017 Ratings8.95 Ratings
    Delivery to Remote Servers9.04 Ratings8.95 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Cyfe, by Traject and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Cyfe, by Traject
    7.2
    19 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    9.9
    9 Ratings
    24% above category average
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)3.018 Ratings9.99 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization8.614 Ratings9.98 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics10.08 Ratings9.98 Ratings
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Cyfe, by Traject and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Cyfe, by Traject
    7.1
    22 Ratings
    18% below category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    -
    Ratings
    Multi-User Support (named login)10.020 Ratings00 Ratings
    Role-Based Security Model6.314 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)8.416 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report-Level Access Control1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Single Sign-On (SSO)9.76 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Capabilities
    Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Cyfe, by Traject and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Cyfe, by Traject
    9.3
    19 Ratings
    18% above category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    -
    Ratings
    Responsive Design for Web Access9.418 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Application10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile7.713 Ratings00 Ratings
    Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
    Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Cyfe, by Traject and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Cyfe, by Traject
    7.0
    7 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    -
    Ratings
    REST API8.64 Ratings00 Ratings
    Javascript API10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    iFrames2.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Java API10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Themeable User Interface (UI)5.94 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customizable Platform (Open Source)5.83 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    CyfeMathematica
    Small Businesses
    Excel4apps
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Chartio (discontinued)
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Jet Reports
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Sisense
    Score6.9 out of 10
    Kibana
    Score8.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CyfeMathematica
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (29 ratings)
    9.9
    (9 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.4
    (9 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.5
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Data Sharing and Collaboration
    9.1
    (27 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Data Sources
    8.3
    (27 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CyfeMathematica
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Traject
    Cyfe might be for you if you are looking for a cost-effective way to display all of your marketing metrics in one place. If you are looking for a detailed, fine-tuned, niche, or extremely specific metrics, this might not be the best solution. Cyfe is good for a general health check-up of marketing, but not a finely tuned examination.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    We are the judgement that Wolfram Mathematica is despite many critics based on the paradigms selected a mark in the fields of the markets for computations of all kind. Wolfram Mathematica is even a choice in fields where other bolide systems reign most of the market. Wolfram Mathematica offers rich flexibility and internally standardizes the right methodologies for his user community. Wolfram Mathematica is not cheap and in need of a hard an long learner journey. That makes it weak in comparison with of-the-shelf-solution packages or even other programming languages. But for systematization of methods Wolfram Mathematica is far in front of almost all the other. Scientist and interested people are able to develop themself further and Wolfram Matheamatica users are a human variant for themself. The reach out for modern mathematics based science is deep and a unique unified framework makes the whole field of mathematics accessable comparable to the brain of Albert Einstein. The paradigms incorporated are the most efficients and consist in assembly on the market. The mathematics is covering and fullfills not just education requirements but the demands and needs of experts.
    Mathematica is incompatible with other systems for mCAx and therefore the borders between the systems are hard to overcome. Wolfram Mathematica should be consider one of the more open systems because other code can be imported and run but on the export side it is rathe incompatible by design purposes. A better standard for all that might solve the crisis but there is none in sight. Selection of knowledge of what works will be in the future even more focussed and general system might be one the lossy side. Knowledge of esthetics of what will be in the highest demand in necessary and Wolfram is not a leader in this field of science. Mathematics leves from gathering problems from application fields and less from the glory of itself and the formalization of this.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Traject
    • Has preset metric groups that pull similar stats together in one "bucket" saving you the time of setting up each stat-line one by one
    • Allows you to easily adjust the timeframe for what stats you want to see, so you can find YOY stats or just last month's stats rather quickly
    • Colored visualizations of stats make it easy to notice when campaigns are taking off
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    • It allows straightforward integration of analytic analysis of algebraic expressions and their numerical implemented.
    • Supports varying programmatic paradigms, so one can choose what best fits the problem or task: pure functions, procedural programming, list processing, and even (with a bit of setup) object-oriented programming.
    • The extensive and rich tools for graphical rendering make it very easy to not just get 2D and 3D renderings of final output, but also to do quick-and-dirty 2D and 3D rendering of intermediate results and/or debugging results.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Traject
    • I'd love to see additional functionality to customize colors. The light/dark option is very nice, but a little more flexibility in the colors would go a long way, especially if it was possible at the dashboard level rather than just the account level. Along the same lines, being able to customize the charts a little more, for example being able to show an x-axis on single data type graphs, could make them easier to read in some cases.
    • Being able to choose to report on converted clicks or conversions in AdWords would be helpful.
    • Needs the ability to show the date range on the shared URL dashboards. Would be even better if the date range was adjustable on that view, too.
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    • Should include more libraries and functions.
    • Should include more functions that can be used in Machine Learning.
    • Should include more functions that can be used in Data Science.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Traject
    It has become a part of our internal tools so unless a competitor comes out with similar functionality as a similar price point it is unlikely that we would not renew. One area that would cause us not to renew would be if a competing service came out with more third-party integrations that match our needs. Price at this point is no longer an issue as it would allow us to automate a somewhat manual process that we have now connecting Cyfe widgets to Google Sheets.
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Traject
    I gave it a rating of 7 because it does a good job at what it does, but there are missing that are missing which I would have benefited from. For instance, if I was able to drill down more on the specific metrics I was able to see, that would have been helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Traject
    Because I had a very minor question and I was able to speak directly to the founder through LinkedIn and through email. I know that as they grow this may not always be an option but the fact that he made himself available to answer my questions said a lot about his passion for the product.
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    Wolfram Mathematica is a nice software package. It has very nice features and easy to install and use in your machine. Besides this, there is a nice support from Wolfram. They come to the university frequently to give seminars in Mathematica. I think this is the best thing they are doing. That is very helpful for graduate and undergraduate students who are using Mathematica in their research.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Traject
    Cyfe is a 15 minutes implementation, then some time to get your data sources created. This is an easy one person job that will not result in down time or unnecessary wasted man hours.
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Traject
    The Salesforce dashboard is comparably flexible and intuitive, but designed more to its internal CRM focus. SumAll shares the social media dashboard capabilities, but lacks all others. Its interesting feature is side-by-side graph analysis for cross-channel performance. Cyfe might borrow from SumAll's default weekly email summary of performance from the dashboard, but implementation could be too complex. Nuvi dashboard is exclusively for social media marketing, but lacks Cyfe's flexibility for third party integration and window customization settings.
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    We have evaluated and are using in some cases the Python language in concert with the Jupyter notebook interface. For UI, we using libraries like React to create visually stunning visualizations of such models. Mathematica compares favorably to this alternative in terms of speed of development. Mathematica compares unfavorably to this alternative in terms of license costs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Traject
    • Cyfe allows us to provide real time data to our clients
    • Cyfe allows us to provide detailed analytics to our clients showing actual results
    • Cyfe reduced our need to provide monthly "reports" to our marketing clients
    • Cyfe allows us to have better situational awareness and know what is going on throughout our multiple organizations
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    • Easy to solve huge mathematical equations, so it saved time there
    • Doing analysis and plotting graphs is also another plus point
    • Learning is very slow, and it took lot of time to learn its scripting language
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots