Clay Pricing

Pricing of the product is a challenge to many users especially small organisations … The software has made possible for us to easily identify quality and high value business prospects. … customer outreach management and segmentation. The product is worth it from pricing…

Learning curve & usability (get teams value faster) Data reliability across sources

ingestion. Software flexibility interms of pricing. Clay has a very friendly pricing model that favours even small businesses and startups. Ease of use. The

would benefit from the HubSpot integration feature, which is on the most expensive plan. We do have some customers that are on that plan just for that integration … your work easier, more fun and more impactful against a fairly reasonable cost. So well suited either for companies that have very large sales teams that … think of an alternative because if you have the right pi…

Clay is much easier to use compared to n8n but n8n beats clay in terms of pricing and data privacy. Clay is fast and easy to iterate and experiment. Whereas

out could need in one place. But it's a little too powerful and far too expensive for the true scrappy startup compared to airtable + integrations. And

use/adaptability. ability to streamline workflows and drive revenue/reduce acquisition cost

weeks of connectivity work - into days of building and at a fraction of the cost

are less dependable and/or hallucinate answers. This happens more with cheaper services.

teams and other enrichment providers, but Clay has condensed that time to value to days.

manual processes and automate them with Clay's AI Claygent quickly. The real value is being able to tweak things on the fly and cascade those changes across

Difficult to learn Forcing me to use their Interface versus an MCP Costing too much

improved to make it easier to find tables fast the credits can be less expensive for cheaper runs.

Pricing

somewhat easy to get started but can take a long time to really get he most value out of the tool. great community though and a ton of learning resources on … the internet. A lot of value for driving revenue and other pipeline goals … very easy to get a lot of value…

Price, too expensive UI at times can be overwhelming, especially in configuring new fields

Credits usage can get expensive Account and contact matching with CRM should be more visible/accessible

cheaper more autonomous … it's suited well for most customers aside from companies doing a lot of volume because it gets expensive.

Massively helped my clients to reduce cost per lead

its much more flexible and cheaper

teams or companies that have no or minimal infrastructure in place as the value clay delivers will be diminished

Small bugs around enrichment Cost optimizations

It works great for outbound, I find it too expensive for inbound enrichment

level. Clay.com has been proven to beat out 5 other vendors we texted. 80% cost savings. … was cheapest in terms of value + data quality

cheaper credits make the UI more easy to use provide more technographic data sources