DemandScience is a data-driven marketing platform that offers lead generation and data services that accelerate the technology sales process by identifying intent among technology buyers. Founded in 2009, DemandScience helps marketers meet the ever-changing demands of B2B sales.
The following is a quick overview of editions offered by other software in similar categories
them, and because their offering is competitive, and because I feel like a valued customer to them. … and perform better down funnel (and also a few that provide leads at a cheaper rate), but many perform worse. They are near the top of the list for us
Uses of assets for content syndication Cost per Lead End to end lead nurturing
further engagement and the leads/responses are faring the same as more expensive lead gen providers.
Prompt in turning around previews and other client deliverables Competitive pricing and good coverage across EMEA markets and Middle East Access to senior decision … - Good coverage across key markets - Competitive pricing - Access to senior decision makers - Solid intent…
opportunities, so your demand gen/ABM infrastructure needs to be airtight to find value out of these leads.
syndication of ebooks, we have found the slightly more competitive cost per lead pricing that suits us for a similar product. The proposal deck / PowerPoint … manner. In terms of cost-per-lead, while DemandS…
lead generation. It is a fast, easy and cost effective way to access more qualified potential buyers. The cost per acquisition is much lower than something … DemandScience has been cost effective. We use another platform for smaller scale campaigns that are too
came from the program. No ROI was gained. The impact was negative because no cost was recovered. … have used direct email organizations, and they are stronger but also more expensive, so you have to weigh your priorities. I could see if you were selling
Positive ROI Low cost per lead
Providing any added value More insight into how leads are acquired A level of QA to ensure leads are
Increase in top-of-funnel contacts for targeting. Low cost per lead/contact.
from our hard to reach audience (C-suite, Dir+ personas) as a manageable cost-per-lead, especially in comparison to other vendors and platforms. We partner … hard-to-reach audience, DemandScience has been critical in generating high value leads. … With DemandScience, we we…
Good overall. It drives a good amount of leads in our ICP, price is okay for the European market. The leads are pretty cold but if you need to fill the … It would be good if they can provide, even if it would be a more expensive service where you genuinely know the leads served interacted with your … to work on reducing the overall CAC pa…
We have used Tech Target in the past which is much more expensive than Demand Science but lead quality is the same across both vendors
quality and reduce our cost per lead. We run content syndication through multiple service providers, but DemandScience is usually cheaper and also offers good-quality
delivery of a high number of leads Haven't closed any deals from them yet Well priced leads
Customer service Ease of set up High quality lead generation Good cost per acquisition … always of good quality. DemandScience leads fit our ICP and provide good value for money.
Estimate lead volumes Had attractive pricing Delivers in a timely fashion Is accurate in delivery
campaigns was very helpful in pitching the product to our clients. The scale and cost of services was competitive and made for a great partnership to help get … Increase POAS High Lead Quality for the Price Prompt Lead Delivery
Pricing
mainly. DemandScience provides a good stream of leads within target at fixed cost, and is a consistent strategy in our lead generation activities.
Lead quality. consistent point of contact/account managers. high cost. … Good conversion to opportunities - need better consistency. High program cost for budgeting - hard to renew with lower ROI. Lead quality across programs
Price Product Features Product Usability
great solution for high-growth companies that want to generate predictable cost/volume of ToFu leads
the past fiscal year -- including MQLs, SQLs and Fractional Pipe (our most valued metrics).
