DemandScience Pricing

“DemandScience was successful in filling the funnel and also the marketing leads generated progressed at a strong opportunity rate and resulted in positive ROI for the client when comparing... … Strong lead volume at an efficient rate Marketing leads that have progressed to opportunities Positive ROI based on investment and preliminary opportunity.”

“A free 14-day demo and the overall cost of the platform is lower than its competitors, thus resulting in better ROI. … The cost of the platform is a worthy investment for the improved pipeline generation.”

“Their pricing structure aligns with the value we receive, particularly when considering the comprehensive nature of their service and the subsequent improvement in our lead conversion rates. … For one product, the content syndication of ebooks, we have found the slightly more competitive cost per lead pricing that suits us for a similar product.”

“Positive ROI Low cost per lead.”

“Pipeline and Opportunity Development ROI on Marketing Dollars Spent Lead Quality Improvement.”

“High program cost for budgeting - hard to renew with lower ROI.”

“DemandScience is well suited for companies looking to start their content syndication programs at an affordable price. … Delivery of quality leads Affordable pricing Responsiveness from campaign manager Flexibility in deadlines Providing credits for any duplicates.”

“Goal is to bring in net new contacts for further engagement and the leads/responses are faring the same as more expensive lead gen providers.”

“There will need to be a robust plan in place for how to turn early stage content syndication leads into opportunities, so your demand gen/ABM infrastructure needs to be airtight to find value out of...”

“We use another platform for smaller scale campaigns that are too small for the DemandScience minimum, and they are more expensive.”

“I have used direct email organizations, and they are stronger but also more expensive, so you have to weigh your priorities.”