Gusto has 3 pricing edition(s), from $406 to $8,012. A free trial of Gusto is also available. Look at different pricing editions below and read more information about the product here to see which one is right for you.
Simple: A streamlined set of automatic payroll features and benefits integrations$40/month + $6/mo per personCloud $12 per employee/contractor | Plus: Comprehensive payroll, benefits, and HR tools for employers building a great place to work$80/month + $12/mo per personCloud | Premium: Scalable payroll and benefits, expert HR, and dedicated support for the complex needs of growing teamsExclusive pricing, contact GustoCloud |
For the latest information on pricing, visit https://gusto.com/product/pricing?utm_source=affiliate&utm_campaign=trustradius
Gusto offers three pricing plans for payroll, benefits, and HR, so you can choose the plan that meets your business needs.
| Feature | Free Version | Paid Version |
|---|---|---|
| Phone | Available | Available |
| Live Chat | Available | Available |
| Available | Available | |
| Forum/Community | Available | Available |
| FAQ/Knowledgebase | Available | Available |
| Social Media | Available | Available |
| Video Tutorials / Webinar | Available | Available |
| Support from Certified HR Pros | Unavailable | Available |
| HR Resource Center | Unavailable | Available |
Gusto is cheaper than ADP and easier to use. Employees also love Gusto.
Gusto is just easier and more affordable for a small business.
that was the default for our company. It cost a lot from the employer's perspective … I think it is great just cost a lot and most business owners I know
Since we only use this one tool, I think it has been cost-effective for our lean team
accountant and Quickbooks. Gusto is the best so far because it is more affordable and makes fewer mistakes.
Cheaper than other products so it saves us money. PTO and time-off tracking saves
Cost tracking. Pay Tracking.
which makes them feel in control of their money I believe Gusto is fairly affordable for my company, making it a good choice in the long run Gusto interacts
time savings cost savings initial setup costs cost
Decreases filing errors Saves administrative time low cost works for our business Integrated benefits management
It is great for small-to-medium organizations where the cost would outweigh the benefits of a full HR staff. It's great for companies … Savings of around 50-70k that an HR rep would cost. It probably saves higher-ups 5-10 hours a month, not having to deal with
department or a payroll roll department, so there's the savings in staffing cost are significant.
Gusto is more cost effective and more user friendly!
to be able to move money to linked non-Gusto accounts instantly without a fee Gusto could provide more information and recommendations to things like savings … I'd like to be able to transfer to non-Gusto accounts instantly without fees and I also wish I could use Gusto instead…
employer sides Employees satisfied with platform Employer satisfied with cost
They are cheaper and work just as good
was view pay stubs and time and print past records. With Gusto I am in charge of keeping track of my own time and pay so it makes me feel more like I'm
It's quite expensive to use, but not a problem. … Gusto is less expensive and easier to use.
acceptable. We are an org of 25 people. I'm not sure a smaller team would find value in it.
It tracks my time efficiently. I really value this as a private contractor because I always have to track my hours but Gusto lets me just clock and clock
Every year, we can definitively say that using Gusto is much more cost-effective than managing related resources in-house. … Gusto is both more cost-effective than their competitors, but also offers most of the features we … We love it. It is cost-effective and comprehensive…
This efficiency boost has led to a 15% increase in overall productivity. Cost Savings: Accurate tax filings and compliance features have saved us approximately
robust platform that offers better benefit options, however Gusto is more cost effective and simple to use. Also, Trinet customer service isn't the best
