IBM Targetprocess Pricing

More value for less money, and easier to set up.

It integrates seamlessly with AWS billing data for improved cost transparency.

can tailor to fit our needs. I give it this rating because I can see great value if we were to use Apptio Enterprise wide and implement Targetprocess along … Reduce level of effort from an engineering perspective Cost-transperancy Able to help data flow from Targetprocess…

Transparency of change data so we can regularly inspect and adapt Reduced cost in comparison to previous supplier.

I use IBM Targetprocess for pull cloud costing for GCP, particularly but also for our Azure tenant … We were using IBM Targetprocess but the cost (so I was told) was a limiting factor

Allows middle management to look up and down the work to ensure alignment to value

Helped reduce contractors that were expensive Dashboard for status reporting Mapping of work with outcomes

future. We would like to use it more strategically, but haven't found that value yet. … workflows, automation. Requires us to pay a contractor to do these things. Expensive to roll out to organization. We have to limit licenses to users t…

Organisation to help us hold together, make visible and track all work and value that is developed and delivered within our Portfolio. We find that no … validations to ensure that we are able to workflow and monitor delivery of value across critical points … for people to see meaning in their work Measurin…

It reduced licensing costs. Shorter time to value when rolling out a wide-reaching company-wide project governance tool. Faster

Faster time to value Faster time to market Overall visibility of financial decisions

Team cost Price per story point Integration with jira

Drilling down to cost per story point. Seeing the forecast and actuals for a product. View the team composition … allocation OKR tracking Cost per story point Reports by team, initiative, epics … Getting the cost per story point

was the more cost effective of the closer rival. It rated the highest in 4 out of the 8 categories we graded and had one of the most cost effective implementation … Cost per user Easier integration setup panel Roadmapping can be improv…

Integration options Project budget & forecasting ROI & cost benefit analysis

and the outcomes from these two agile release trains, spread across six value streams, can be managed, tracked, and delivered. … Costing can be come onerouse when wanting to use it across ALL teams Roadmap views … Better overall usability and FUTURE functionality Cost…

collaboration Cross-departmental communication Enterprise-wide transparency Affordable licensing … important for our team was ease of administration, ease of configuration, cost of licenses, and ability to leverage the tool in multiple areas (not just

progress of that work. In addition it is easy to tie that work to OKRs. Cost and hours rollup across the work hierarchy works well. Our users like the

utilization/capacity/cost; understanding cost of features deployed for a product & TCO; Managing strategic portfolio & funding intake … Cost transparency … Integration Configuration License cost

Cost transparency, ability to do showback to the internal business units … believe. Time to value seems quiet long in my opinion. … Provide cost breakdown by

our cost transparency model in Apptio Targetprocess. … The user interface works well for our users The data that it outputs is useable for our cost model … - Requires multiple tools now due to licensing + Supplements our cost model for increased transparency

Reduced cost for multiple products Seamless integration with ADO/TFS

Cost Management. Risk Management. Asset Management.

Cost tracking Resource planning