Kemp LoadMaster Pricing

Low cost solution easy to implement and maintain Provides HA uptime of the required

Cost is reasonable, and it paid for itself already Learning curve can be a bit

don't need to load balance, then you don't need it, lol. So if there's a cheaper alternative to [Kemp LoadMaster] then that's your solution.

allowed us to meet our remote load balancing needs at less than 10% of the cost of our main office load balancing solution. Support has solved all issues … Kemp's Loadmaster was a great fit for the use case, at a fraction of the price.

Kemp [LoadMaster] is an affordable solution for enterprise needs and can handle a large volume of sessions … [It is good] value for [the] money. Post-purchase experience is good. [It is] easy to implement

good price. … [Kemp LoadMaster is more] stable and [has] better pricing.

Cost, compared with HA-Proxy. Backup/Restore, I wish they could be in one place

Pricing Better GUI can be more informative in terms of graphs/traffic/setting up … Good ROI Pricing can be still competitive

Not as many bells and whistles as the competitors. Cheaper than some competitors, but not super cheap. Depending on your needs there are some free options

professional and enterprise grade than a simple open source tool that is free of charge like HAProxy. LoadMaster fares better in Windows application environments

Does the job of a much more expensive load-balancer. Provides simple and reliable solutions for the task. Doesn't

Firstly, Kemp LoadMaster's pricing makes this product much more affordable than other options on … Stability Good Support Well priced Lack

Very positive ROI. Provisioning of new systems has become much cheaper and more efficient. We do not have to incur any additional licensing costs … Price and ease of use are much better than Citrix ADC. The CPU and memory utilization

excellent feature. If your organization needs all these great features but in cost crunch, Kemp is the solution. If tech support is more important, Kemp is … So far it's all positive impact. The cost of Kemp is very low compared to other solutions in the market, so ROI is … which is p…

It is very cost effective and easy to use. We haven't had any scalability issues. The software … We selected Kemp due to the low cost and ease of use compared to F5.

[LoadMaster] was the first load-balancer we looked at, and it provided a good price/performance balance for us.

Communications and IT Development. It has provided a robust, simpler & more affordable alternative to Netscaler or F5 for HA Load Balancing of critical internal

If we ever ran into issues with more complex setups, we got quick help. Value for money compared to competitors. … LoadMaster for many projects. For a lot of customers, load balancers were too expensive or too complicated before we introduced Kemp products. It's not a…

features at the beginning. The load balancer we purchased was at a good price point for the budget we had for it and for all the features it provided. … evaluated products, mainly in speed of setup, features available, and overall cost of ownership. In the case of the Azure…

support team Great documentations for their products and features Great value for price ratio … [Selected for] good business performance and noticeable price advantage.

production environments with an at a glance view is indispensable. The cost is the best price on the market, in my opinion, and the support team I have access … nice to have a holistic solution that provides such great value at such a reasonable cost. … already recommended Kemp LoadMaster to my peers in the organizatio…

product and the cost of the units has freed us to work on other technical issues. … We chose Kemp LoadMaster because it is 1/10 the price of the competition

want to go with a legacy setup, there can be better products (but not as cost effective as Kemp ones).

The Kemp solution is more cost-effective, templates are appreciated and support is always appreciated.