LambdaTest Reviews and Ratings

Rating: 8.9 out of 10

Score

8.9 out of 10

Community insights

TrustRadius Insights for LambdaTest are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.

Pros

Cross-browser and cross-device testing capabilities: Many users have found the product's ability to perform cross-browser and cross-device testing to be very useful for ensuring compatibility across different platforms. They appreciated how it allowed them to easily test their applications on various browsers and devices.

Live interactive testing feature: The live interactive testing feature has been highly appreciated by users as it enables them to test their applications in real-time. This allows them to make necessary adjustments on-the-go, resulting in more efficient and effective testing.

Automated testing functionality: Users have praised the automated testing feature for its efficiency and time-saving benefits. It eliminates the need for manual intervention, allowing tests to run automatically, which saves significant time and effort.

Reviews

111 Reviews

LambdaTest review

Rating: 8 out of 10

Incentivized

December 2, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Using LambdaTest to ensure our website and native app work with multiple devices as well as running our appium automation for the app on actual devices remotely. We had a trial for web automation (which we decided not to go ahead with at the moment) and also smart UI for more continuous testing on a storybook project.

Pros

UI is very nice
Customer support is very good when needed
works reliably

Cons

Some documentation can be confusing
Some documentation is also out of date

Likelihood to Recommend

The web automation aspects did not work for us currently with our testcafe project however we are looking forward to another trial when we are fully migrated with playwright.

The day to day usability and ability to use a lot of different devices is very appreciated & needed as a QA, it does this well.

emma buttery

SDET in Quality Assurance at Direct ferries (51-200 employees)

Vetted Review

3 years of experience

Helpful for Daily Cross-Browser Testing

Rating: 8 out of 10

Incentivized

November 25, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use LambdaTest for quick cross browser testing because our users come from different devices. It helps us catch UI bugs we usually miss locally.It basically solve the problem of inconsistent behavior across browsers.

Pros

UI comparisation
Automation
Cross browser testing

Cons

Pricing will be little bit cheaper
Real devices are little bit laggy
Session disconnect issue happened sometimes

Likelihood to Recommend

It works great when we need fast cross browser and device testing, specially for catching small UI or responsive issues. It’s easy for quick demos too. But for heavy animation tests or long automation runs it becomes less reliable sometimes, and pricing also feel a bit high.

Ahsan Noor

Head of Technology in Information Technology at Vintara International (1-10 employees)

Vetted Review

1 year of experience

View profile

LambdaTest Review

Rating: 10 out of 10

October 16, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

LambdaTest proved very helpful for testing products across multiple virtual devices and browsers. The cross-browser and cross-device functionality made it easier to evaluate real-world behavior and demonstrate accurate product performance to clients, which improved client trust and boosted confidence in delivered work.Use cases and deployment scopeUsed as a tester to validate product behavior on different virtual devices and browser versions under one roof.Applied for mobile app testing on Android and iOS using real devices provided on the platform.Valuable for demonstrating real product visualization and performance to clients, helping to communicate issues and improvements effectively.

Pros

Virtual devices replicate real device resolutions and behaviors, enabling realistic testing without needing physical devices.
Virtual browsers with up-to-date versions allow performance and compatibility analysis across browser releases.

Cons

Deep, low-level debugging can be harder remotely

Likelihood to Recommend

Platform increases testing efficiency and simplifies running tests across multiple real devices in a single place.

Verified User

Engineer in Engineering (10,001+ employees)

Vetted Review

2 years of experience

Seamless Experience in Mobile Testing

Rating: 8 out of 10

October 2, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I have used LambdaTest for Real time Mobile testing and Mobile Automation. It is great experience, user-friendly and we can test Android, iOS and iPad. We can reach out to the support team for any kind of help/issues. They are responding in no time and assisting better. We can also trigger automation and we can watch the live mobile screen when we are executing which is great. We can get to know if the test is running or failing for any reason. If we want to check any locator during run time, we have the option to detect the locator during run time. Overall, it's amazing to use LambdaTest and no big issues faced. For configration related and clarity related, I have raised a support ticket. They assisted me quickly and resolved.

Pros

We can test android, iOS and iPad along with different version
We can take screenshot and screen recording during real time mobile automation which is helpful for documentation and error reporting
We can also trigger automation and we can watch the live mobile screen when we are executing which is great
Parallel Executions possible

Cons

QR/ Bar Code Scanner functionality
Interactive with Screens for uploaded apps during runtime
Sometimes It is hard to use Web page Locators inside Mobile

Likelihood to Recommend

We are using Mobile testing for Ecommerce post sales. It is most suited since we are testing a technician app who is going for service. It is easy and real time to track for us the process. It actually involves a map where we can track the technician and also, they can upload the proof necessary which is all just like the mobile.

Verified User

Engineer in Information Technology (10,001+ employees)

Vetted Review

3 years of experience

Honest Opinion for LambdaTest why should you use it

Rating: 9 out of 10

October 2, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

As we are a product based company, therefore to thoroughly test our Frontend application, we use LambdaTest. LambdaTest offers testing of application on all types of devices thus ensuring the product quality. The speed of execution of UI Automation suites in LambdaTest is very efficient with minimum drops in network.

Pros

Emulators : Speed of execution is Awesome
Network Connectivity : Very smooth/minimal lags/drops
All Types of features available, Remote browsing of reports as well

Cons

Can add more devices as per the organisations are taking in use
Can introduce parallel execution of test cases
Local Testing can also be made easier while executions

Likelihood to Recommend

We built our UI Automation framework & needed to execute the tests on remote server/instead of using the local emulator, Therefore used LambdaTest. This was out best decision ever made as it fulfilled our requirement to test the application on most of the devices and executed automation in low efforts.

Verified User

Engineer in Engineering (10,001+ employees)

Vetted Review

2 years of experience

Made QAs Life Easy

Rating: 10 out of 10

August 14, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We had execution environment issues for multi-environment on our Automation test framework that's where LT's Hyper-execute introduced to run regression on the different environments. As soon as our QA team commit the code, Hyper execute is automatically triggers and starts execution based on the Environment and Browsers and when the execution gets completed report is generated with result. It has the dashboard where quickly user can filter out the failed test and analyze for the fixes to be done

Pros

Parallel Execution
Reporting dashboard
Huge Device support
Platforms like Android, iOS versions

Cons

Improve Support to resolve issues quickly

Likelihood to Recommend

If your project has multiple environment and need regression tests to be executed repetitively for different platforms and browser versions, it is best suited. I have heard of Security testing feature too but I haven't tried yet If your project has limited pages and content is static where frequent changes are not done then it is less appropriate.

Syeda Sufiya Parveen

Sr QA Lead in Information Technology at Sakosoft (1001-5000 employees)

Vetted Review

2 years of experience

Solid tool for cross device testing and cross browser testing with room for improvement.

Rating: 9 out of 10

August 14, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We are using LambdaTest for our app automation using selenium and appium and running our testcases through LambdaTest using different device.

It helps us to not maintain the physical device and we can run our regression tests in any of the devices with older or newer device or any older version of the app. also we are planning to automate our web automation tests and planning to user our app in app live feature to test the app in real devices to check the compatibility across various devices.

Pros

Cross browser testing - helps us to test the sites across different browsers and different os.
Real device testing- we can test our apps in iOS and android real devices at anytime.
Advance tools like UI inspector, debugging information, session recording, screen recording.

Cons

Performance issue in real device testing it is very slow sometimes even the internet is stable
The UX is confusing when I am recording the screen for app is is saved in files but as first time user I cant find where the recording was saved.
Support for more devtools like chrome devtools are missing.

Likelihood to Recommend

LambdaTest is well suited for cross browser and cross-device testing in automated workflow as well as manual tests. particularly when running any automation test the whole team can see the test running live. it is ideal for mobile testing and CI/CD integrations. it is difficult to do complex regression test suits and lacks for advance debugging tools

Verified User

Employee in Quality Assurance (11-50 employees)

Vetted Review

Excellent Software for Mobile App Testing

Rating: 10 out of 10

August 11, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We have been using LambdaTest for the last year of application testing on Android and iOS devices. LambdaTest provides multiple real devices on a single platform, which saves lots of time and money. It is very easy to use. Customer support team is also very responsive.

Pros

Provide 1000+ Real Device
Android & iOS both Devices
Very Fast

Likelihood to Recommend

For us, It saves lot of time to test app on different devices. You can test your mobile app on multiple devices at one place and also it save money.

Verified User

Engineer in Information Technology (201-500 employees)

Vetted Review

4 years of experience

Best Solution for App Testing

Rating: 10 out of 10

July 1, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

LambdaTest is the best tool for App testing. We are using it form last 3 years in our organization for App testing in Real Devices. It provides multiple real devices at single place. You can test your app on Android & IOS both devices. They provide more the 1000 devices on there platform. It is very easy to use. Customer support is very good. It saves lots of time and money.

Pros

Multiple Devices at one Place
Save time
Affordable Solution

Cons

Likelihood to Recommend

It saves lots of time. Easy to use and setup. Varieties of Devices.

Rahul Arya

Team Lead in Information Technology at SDLC Corp (201-500 employees)

Vetted Review

8 years of experience

Best Tool for testing product with cross browsing along with real virtual LambdaTest

Rating: 9 out of 10

June 20, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I used LambdaTest as a tester to test the product on different virtual devices. Which helps me to understand about how I can enhance the user experience of the product. Due to it cross browsing functionality I can test my product performance under different browser including to their version under one roof. Which is one of the great things I have seen and used so far. One of my biggest business problems has been resolved to create awareness in front of my clients about the actual product performance and visualization. Which creates trust and confidence in front of my client towards me and also motivates me to do such good work.

Pros

It provides a virtual device that acts as an actual device resolution. Due to that anyone can take a feel of how their product will behave and enact without using actual devices.
Another example is that it also provides a virtual browser with their latest version which helps to analysed the performance of the product.

Cons

As per my experience i would like to say about the performance issue specially when switching the device virtually
Another one which i would like to say about it like session timeout it occurs so quickly if person is inactive while watching and understanding the scenarios
One of the key issue which i feel is that about the documentation which sometimes maybe outdate or not provide the in depth info for automation features

Likelihood to Recommend

As per my experience, LambdaTest is best suited for cross-browser testing due to its providing all trending virtual browsers like Chrome, Edge, Safari, Firefox, etc., along with their latest version. It also provides a flexibility of manual testing the product on different mobile devices which gives the actual user interface of the product for understanding the in depth info of the product.

hardik panchal

Quality Assurance Engineer in Information Technology at Technobot System Pvt Ltd (11-50 employees)

Vetted Review

2 years of experience

Loading Reviews List....

Home
,
Cross-Browser Testing
,
LambdaTest
,
Reviews and Ratings

Best Tool for testing product with cross browsing along with real virtual LambdaTest

Rating: 9 out of 10

June 20, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Pros

It provides a virtual device that acts as an actual device resolution. Due to that anyone can take a feel of how their product will behave and enact without using actual devices.
Another example is that it also provides a virtual browser with their latest version which helps to analysed the performance of the product.

Cons

As per my experience i would like to say about the performance issue specially when switching the device virtually
Another one which i would like to say about it like session timeout it occurs so quickly if person is inactive while watching and understanding the scenarios
One of the key issue which i feel is that about the documentation which sometimes maybe outdate or not provide the in depth info for automation features

Likelihood to Recommend

hardik panchal

Quality Assurance Engineer in Information Technology at Technobot System Pvt Ltd (11-50 employees)

Vetted Review

2 years of experience