TrustRadius Insights for LambdaTest are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.
Pros
Cross-browser and cross-device testing capabilities: Many users have found the product's ability to perform cross-browser and cross-device testing to be very useful for ensuring compatibility across different platforms. They appreciated how it allowed them to easily test their applications on various browsers and devices.
Live interactive testing feature: The live interactive testing feature has been highly appreciated by users as it enables them to test their applications in real-time. This allows them to make necessary adjustments on-the-go, resulting in more efficient and effective testing.
Automated testing functionality: Users have praised the automated testing feature for its efficiency and time-saving benefits. It eliminates the need for manual intervention, allowing tests to run automatically, which saves significant time and effort.
We use LambdaTest for quick cross browser testing because our users come from different devices. It helps us catch UI bugs we usually miss locally.It basically solve the problem of inconsistent behavior across browsers.
Pros
UI comparisation
Automation
Cross browser testing
Cons
Pricing will be little bit cheaper
Real devices are little bit laggy
Session disconnect issue happened sometimes
Likelihood to Recommend
It works great when we need fast cross browser and device testing, specially for catching small UI or responsive issues. It’s easy for quick demos too. But for heavy animation tests or long automation runs it becomes less reliable sometimes, and pricing also feel a bit high.
LambdaTest proved very helpful for testing products across multiple virtual devices and browsers. The cross-browser and cross-device functionality made it easier to evaluate real-world behavior and demonstrate accurate product performance to clients, which improved client trust and boosted confidence in delivered work.Use cases and deployment scopeUsed as a tester to validate product behavior on different virtual devices and browser versions under one roof.Applied for mobile app testing on Android and iOS using real devices provided on the platform.Valuable for demonstrating real product visualization and performance to clients, helping to communicate issues and improvements effectively.
Pros
Virtual devices replicate real device resolutions and behaviors, enabling realistic testing without needing physical devices.
Virtual browsers with up-to-date versions allow performance and compatibility analysis across browser releases.
Cons
Deep, low-level debugging can be harder remotely
Likelihood to Recommend
Platform increases testing efficiency and simplifies running tests across multiple real devices in a single place.
I have used LambdaTest for Real time Mobile testing and Mobile Automation. It is great experience, user-friendly and we can test Android, iOS and iPad. We can reach out to the support team for any kind of help/issues. They are responding in no time and assisting better. We can also trigger automation and we can watch the live mobile screen when we are executing which is great. We can get to know if the test is running or failing for any reason. If we want to check any locator during run time, we have the option to detect the locator during run time. Overall, it's amazing to use LambdaTest and no big issues faced. For configration related and clarity related, I have raised a support ticket. They assisted me quickly and resolved.
Pros
We can test android, iOS and iPad along with different version
We can take screenshot and screen recording during real time mobile automation which is helpful for documentation and error reporting
We can also trigger automation and we can watch the live mobile screen when we are executing which is great
Parallel Executions possible
Cons
QR/ Bar Code Scanner functionality
Interactive with Screens for uploaded apps during runtime
Sometimes It is hard to use Web page Locators inside Mobile
Likelihood to Recommend
We are using Mobile testing for Ecommerce post sales. It is most suited since we are testing a technician app who is going for service. It is easy and real time to track for us the process. It actually involves a map where we can track the technician and also, they can upload the proof necessary which is all just like the mobile.
VU
Verified User
Engineer in Information Technology (10,001+ employees)
As we are a product based company, therefore to thoroughly test our Frontend application, we use LambdaTest. LambdaTest offers testing of application on all types of devices thus ensuring the product quality. The speed of execution of UI Automation suites in LambdaTest is very efficient with minimum drops in network.
Pros
Emulators : Speed of execution is Awesome
Network Connectivity : Very smooth/minimal lags/drops
All Types of features available, Remote browsing of reports as well
Cons
Can add more devices as per the organisations are taking in use
Can introduce parallel execution of test cases
Local Testing can also be made easier while executions
Likelihood to Recommend
We built our UI Automation framework & needed to execute the tests on remote server/instead of using the local emulator, Therefore used LambdaTest. This was out best decision ever made as it fulfilled our requirement to test the application on most of the devices and executed automation in low efforts.
We had execution environment issues for multi-environment on our Automation test framework that's where LT's Hyper-execute introduced to run regression on the different environments. As soon as our QA team commit the code, Hyper execute is automatically triggers and starts execution based on the Environment and Browsers and when the execution gets completed report is generated with result. It has the dashboard where quickly user can filter out the failed test and analyze for the fixes to be done
Pros
Parallel Execution
Reporting dashboard
Huge Device support
Platforms like Android, iOS versions
Cons
Improve Support to resolve issues quickly
Likelihood to Recommend
If your project has multiple environment and need regression tests to be executed repetitively for different platforms and browser versions, it is best suited. I have heard of Security testing feature too but I haven't tried yet If your project has limited pages and content is static where frequent changes are not done then it is less appropriate.
We are using LambdaTest for our app automation using selenium and appium and running our testcases through LambdaTest using different device.
It helps us to not maintain the physical device and we can run our regression tests in any of the devices with older or newer device or any older version of the app. also we are planning to automate our web automation tests and planning to user our app in app live feature to test the app in real devices to check the compatibility across various devices.
Pros
Cross browser testing - helps us to test the sites across different browsers and different os.
Real device testing- we can test our apps in iOS and android real devices at anytime.
Performance issue in real device testing it is very slow sometimes even the internet is stable
The UX is confusing when I am recording the screen for app is is saved in files but as first time user I cant find where the recording was saved.
Support for more devtools like chrome devtools are missing.
Likelihood to Recommend
LambdaTest is well suited for cross browser and cross-device testing in automated workflow as well as manual tests. particularly when running any automation test the whole team can see the test running live. it is ideal for mobile testing and CI/CD integrations. it is difficult to do complex regression test suits and lacks for advance debugging tools
We have been using LambdaTest for the last year of application testing on Android and iOS devices. LambdaTest provides multiple real devices on a single platform, which saves lots of time and money. It is very easy to use. Customer support team is also very responsive.
Pros
Provide 1000+ Real Device
Android & iOS both Devices
Very Fast
Likelihood to Recommend
For us, It saves lot of time to test app on different devices. You can test your mobile app on multiple devices at one place and also it save money.
VU
Verified User
Engineer in Information Technology (201-500 employees)
LambdaTest is the best tool for App testing. We are using it form last 3 years in our organization for App testing in Real Devices. It provides multiple real devices at single place. You can test your app on Android & IOS both devices. They provide more the 1000 devices on there platform. It is very easy to use. Customer support is very good. It saves lots of time and money.
Pros
Multiple Devices at one Place
Save time
Affordable Solution
Cons
NA
Likelihood to Recommend
It saves lots of time. Easy to use and setup. Varieties of Devices.
I used LambdaTest as a tester to test the product on different virtual devices. Which helps me to understand about how I can enhance the user experience of the product. Due to it cross browsing functionality I can test my product performance under different browser including to their version under one roof. Which is one of the great things I have seen and used so far. One of my biggest business problems has been resolved to create awareness in front of my clients about the actual product performance and visualization. Which creates trust and confidence in front of my client towards me and also motivates me to do such good work.
Pros
It provides a virtual device that acts as an actual device resolution. Due to that anyone can take a feel of how their product will behave and enact without using actual devices.
Another example is that it also provides a virtual browser with their latest version which helps to analysed the performance of the product.
Cons
As per my experience i would like to say about the performance issue specially when switching the device virtually
Another one which i would like to say about it like session timeout it occurs so quickly if person is inactive while watching and understanding the scenarios
One of the key issue which i feel is that about the documentation which sometimes maybe outdate or not provide the in depth info for automation features
Likelihood to Recommend
As per my experience, LambdaTest is best suited for cross-browser testing due to its providing all trending virtual browsers like Chrome, Edge, Safari, Firefox, etc., along with their latest version. It also provides a flexibility of manual testing the product on different mobile devices which gives the actual user interface of the product for understanding the in depth info of the product.
We use LambdaTest to test our Shopify apps and SaaS web applications. We test custom Shopify app blocks and embedded Shopify app pages. We ensure that our user experience is not disrupted and that the functionalities of our Shopify apps are working properly for our users.LambdaTest saves time and cost for our QA process.
Pros
Custom Shopify app blocks
App embedded pages
Websites
Cons
Live browser sessions can be improved in terms of performance.
The accuracy of real device behavior can be better.
More advanced debugging tools would be helpful for troubleshooting issues during live testing.
Likelihood to Recommend
LambdaTest is helpful for testing our Shopify apps and websites across different browsers and devices. It ensures that our apps and sites work properly across all browsers, devices, and operating systems.
