For the latest information on pricing, visit the official pricing page
30-day free trial, no credit card required.
Other pricing plans from leading alternatives in this category.
| Feature | Free Version | Paid Version |
|---|---|---|
| Forum/Community | Available | Available |
| FAQ/Knowledgebase | Available | Available |
| Social Media | Available | Available |
| Video Tutorials / Webinar | Available | Available |
| Phone | Unavailable | Available |
| Unavailable | Available |
Easy to use configure Reliability Price Support
including administrative and user quality of life, ability to get support, at the cost of licensing of course.
Resonable Price for what it does. Easy to manage. Well documented online
built-in MFA functionality, we are able to further secure the solution, affording us a higher level of confidence that our infrastructure is safe.
scenario the cost of Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS) themselves and license costs didin't reduce costs at all as the cost of Parallels … Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS) provided the most cost effective option for virtualizing applications.…
Lower asset cost Lower licences needed for certain apps Less time spending updating since
IT Supports Requests as it can be accessible by browser Reduced licensing cost when compared to citrix … Server (Parallels RAS) provides the finest end user experience while being cost-effective and reducing administrative and support man hours. Parallels … cost
Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS) is significantly less expensive than our previous product which we used for this purpose. Basically half
Lower IT admin Far more cost affective than Citrix Seamless experience for users
Easy remote access setup. Cheaper than other options. Lets Mac users remote in without issue.
end-user support requirements are critical to the IT organization. We see the value of having ease of access to end users and applications at the same time … It’s a good product at this price point … The cost of the two products is significantly
RAS) is well suited for access to legacy application (client / server). Is cheaper respect to Citrix and have a lot of features that the simple microsoft RAS
resources to remote workers without VPN VDI solution in a BOX Reasonably priced … stack up. VMware Horizon was also evaluated and skipped because of higher cost and complexity.
activities. So we decided to work with Parallels RAS because it has a good pricing and it is easy to configure. … Server (Parallels RAS) is well suited for companies who wants to have a good priced solution for remote connections or home office activities which is also … stacks up aga…
Reduced licensing cost Cost effective compared to other providers Lower it overhead … that receives product updates and features regularly. Parallels is also a cost effective solution compared to more prominent providers such as Citrix but
probably not well suited for a very small environment simply due to the cost. … In my experience, a much simpler solution, less expensive than citrix.
removed from us after 8 years without warning, causing a doubling of the price, after providing a signed sales quote for renewal through our VAR. Parallels … any device avoiding the need to install anything on device. I can see its value in Retail, Remote services, Manufacturing,…
Less expensive than Microsoft licesning Simple deployment requiring less time from IT
that allows users to access their applications / data from any device. The Cost is lower than some other offerings available. Enabled us to transition to … Central Management Secure Low Cost … Cost for small rollouts is high Limited training Requires high bandwidth
The price demands that Parallels Remote requires is hefty. The new users experience
customers have had dramatic cost decreases due to no longer needing IT departments to work with our software. We've been able to charge more for our hosting services … not only was Parallels much easier to set up and use, but it was much more cost-effective.
Price is better for Parallels and Easier to install/roll out.
Parallels were very cheap to implement, both from man-hours and licensing perspective compared to competitors … Parallels were much cheaper than all the other products we looked at, and licensing costs primarily
Cost-effectiveness; Technical and Service Support.
