Related Quote from Verified User
RAS) is well suited for access to legacy application (client / server). Is cheaper respect to Citrix and have a lot of features that the simple microsoft RAS
For the latest information on pricing, visit https://www.parallels.com/products/ras/buy
Feature | Free Version | Paid Version |
---|---|---|
Forum/Community | Available | Available |
FAQ/Knowledgebase | Available | Available |
Social Media | Available | Available |
Video Tutorials / Webinar | Available | Available |
Phone | Unavailable | Available |
Unavailable | Available |
RAS) is well suited for access to legacy application (client / server). Is cheaper respect to Citrix and have a lot of features that the simple microsoft RAS
resources to remote workers without VPN VDI solution in a BOX Reasonably priced … stack up. VMware Horizon was also evaluated and skipped because of higher cost and complexity.
activities. So we decided to work with Parallels RAS because it has a good pricing and it is easy to configure. … Server (Parallels RAS) is well suited for companies who wants to have a good priced solution for remote connections or home office activities which is also … stacks up aga…
Reduced licensing cost Cost effective compared to other providers Lower it overhead … that receives product updates and features regularly. Parallels is also a cost effective solution compared to more prominent providers such as Citrix but
probably not well suited for a very small environment simply due to the cost. … In my experience, a much simpler solution, less expensive than citrix.
removed from us after 8 years without warning, causing a doubling of the price, after providing a signed sales quote for renewal through our VAR. Parallels … any device avoiding the need to install anything on device. I can see its value in Retail, Remote services, Manufacturing,…
Less expensive than Microsoft licesning Simple deployment requiring less time from IT
recommend switching to Parallels Remote Application Server, cheaper in-licensing and cheaper in infrastructure needs. It's also a lot easier to implement … lingering software bug we had did cause a negative effect on deployments and cost us a lot more time and money in support-related questions. … behind it. This made the product much more secure a…
that allows users to access their applications / data from any device. The Cost is lower than some other offerings available. Enabled us to transition to … Central Management Secure Low Cost … Cost for small rollouts is high Limited training Requires high bandwidth
systems request and this calls for extra machines. Parallels Remote has a price challenge, which demands some businesses to invest heavily. Other features
The price demands that Parallels Remote requires is hefty. The new users experience
customers have had dramatic cost decreases due to no longer needing IT departments to work with our software. We've been able to charge more for our hosting services … not only was Parallels much easier to set up and use, but it was much more cost-effective.
Price is better for Parallels and Easier to install/roll out.
Parallels were very cheap to implement, both from man-hours and licensing perspective compared to competitors … Parallels were much cheaper than all the other products we looked at, and licensing costs primarily
Cost-effectiveness; Technical and Service Support.
Costing is one place, where it might not be very suitable for a startup. Also, there … Cost-effectiveness and amazing technical support.
crashing that had been happening previously. It immediately added tremendous value and end-user satisfaction.
We can provide one server to multiple clients at relatively low cost.
I think it's a pretty easy comparison of the two. Citrix is more expensive and more complicated compared to Parallels Remote Application Server; however … We tend to stick with Hyper-V as a hypervisor as the cost benefits outweigh our customer requirements at present. However, knowing &h…
remote access solutions. The licensing model, in some cases, makes it more affordable than competing solutions. … Parallels Remote Application Server has been easier and less expensive to implement for our clients than VMware Horizon and offers a better experience
Price Product Features
Access from anywhere with an Internet connection. Easy to manage. Excellent price/performance.
Price Product Features Product Reputation … In 2005 we only had the choice between Parallels (then called "2x" and Citrix. 2x/Parallels cost much less … The price factor has changed significantly. There are issues with being able to use
single most important factor was actually the price. When we replaced Citrix with Parallels it was initially a cost-saving alternative. It was only after we … that are offsite. We found it simpler to get up and running and much less expensive than Citrix. Printing … Para…