Skip to main content
TrustRadius
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

Overview

What is Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)?

Red Hat Enterprise Linux is a Linux distribution mainly used in commercial data centers.

Read more
Recent Reviews

Enterprise Linux

10 out of 10
May 14, 2024
Incentivized
So we use Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) on our virtualized virtual machines. We install the OS. And on top of the OS we have …
Continue reading
Read all reviews

Awards

Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards

Reviewer Pros & Cons

View all pros & cons

Video Reviews

7 videos

Automation Architect Dissects | Red Hat RHEL Review
04:11
Systems Architect Doesn't Mince Words - Red Hat RHEL Review
04:46
Honest Senior Analytics Engineer Dishes | Red Hat RHEL Review
07:36
Return to navigation

Product Demos

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 8 Virtual Disk Optimizer (VDO) Demo.

YouTube

OCB: Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) for Edge - Ben Breard (Red Hat)

YouTube

Install Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8

YouTube
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)?

Red Hat Enterprise Linux is a Linux distribution mainly used in commercial data centers.


Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Technical Details

Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(311)

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-21 of 21)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We use Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) for our entire SAP environment as well as every other Linux based system that is of any importance running production workloads. Support is the biggest business problem that using RHEL addresses. Me being an IT Engineer / Linux Admin means I'm one of the few responsible for managing our RHEL systems.
  • It's stable
  • Has a support system
  • Feels trustworthy
  • More up to date kernel for hardware compatibility by default
  • Better visibility for which desktop environment is default and how to get others
  • Bring back the post RHEL source
The major scenario where Red Hat Enterprise Linux best suited would be in any scenario where the application is running in production and would cause downtime / loss of revenue when that system goes down. The support system alone is worth it. An area where it's less appropriate would be where you need / want package updates earlier / faster and better hardware support with a newer kernel.
May 14, 2024

Enterprise Linux

Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
So we use Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) on our virtualized virtual machines. We install the OS. And on top of the OS we have applications like Middleware, component, JBoss, IBM, Webware, or other components which our internal application team needs to use it. We are part of a hosting hosting platform, so all the applications. That's it on enterprise Linux.
  • Virtualization, like the operating system level task. I see this product is very good and it blends very well with the middleware components like all the JBoss and other things. And other than that, either you install it or a virtual machine or physical servers, it works seamlessly anywhere. And if you want to go further, like Red Hat OpenShift or those things also work very nice with it.
  • I would say for me ease of use is very good. We don't find any much more challenges with the LINUX part. Only thing maybe when we go for appliances or network devices, right? Instead of using Enterprise Linux, we use CentOS or some other product. Probably if they can customize for network devices and all, maybe it's more they use other softwares. So that's the only thing I overall I don't have any specific feedback for Linux. Yeah, it's good. Nice.
I think it's best suited for all the monolithic application where you just need a VM and you on top of that VM you need to install a compatible product. So it's best suited for those. Where's not suited. As I said, maybe I've seen in my organization mostly our internal application teams, they go for a different operating system for appliances or network maybe it might be due to the product compatibility, not with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), but that's something maybe you should have a look or probably it's not a improvement anywhere.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We currently use Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) as a lightweight OS for multiple applications including webpages and developers to develop in. The flexibility and support make it one of the best options for a business in my opinion. The documentation as well is very helpful as well as the community efforts behind Linux to lead to better understanding and use cases.
  • Lots of flexibility with what you want or dont want installed using it.
  • Support is very excellent with someone willing to chat or email you answers if you have questions
  • ability to adapt to different use cases and Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) adding particular functionality that may be useful down the line to the OS.
  • More up front way of providing details on support for particular version of OS. If one has 2 years of support but a minor release has 6 years of support. let us know to upgrade if we want better support. or provide a way of showing when support ends on the server itself
  • Easier rollback methods when and update doesnt work properly
  • More support for legacy stuff like python 2 (backwards compatibility).
More suited for business or professional use. For smaller use like a laptop or pet project id recommend another OS. Especially because certain repos have more support for smaller stuff like that like in Debian. Though professionally it is definitely second to none id much rather recommend Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) than something like Ubuntu.
May 13, 2024

RedHat Review

Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
So business problems that we address is really, it's the underlying platform by which we stand up our server technology that we have to support. So we use it as pretty much high available secure operating system for the different services that we have running on them.
  • I'd say as far as security, having security built in and baked in from the start, I think Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) does really well. I think the packaging, the updating as well as just the Ansible integration in it all, just being able to leverage Ansible in a lot of ways with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) has been huge. The imaging process is fairly easy, so I just like it overall as far as it comes ready to be implemented, secured, and deployed to production in a lot of ways. As far as the built-in tools make it easier, and it's something I've been familiar with for a long time and something they've improved upon specifically has been Damon's system. CTL has been a huge help.
  • I'd say the more advanced security tooling features, but maybe that's because I don't leverage any of the GUI complimentary software suites. But really just being able to leverage FA policy aid A ID and SE Linux in a more intuitive way. Maybe that's just training. I think training is another thing that could be helpful. Just having the training subscriptions accessible for my team can be super helpful. Really the biggest gap we have, it's just making sure that people are trained on the technology we're leveraging.
I would say for enterprise server management for just essentially servers that don't require GUI or that you want to run in a kind of secure, standalone fashion. I think it does become difficult with integrating with different identity providers. So that can be a pain point as far as integration with active directory or any kind of ldap. But I would say as far as just being able to provide confidence that you're deploying a secure product from the outset and that it serves the needs of the different infrastructure as far as compatibility with a lot of software that's built on the platform. So I think it's really helpful for serving that server software in the cloud or on virtual machines wherever.
Stephen Berg | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We use Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) on our edge devices, web server and scp server.
Internally we use Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) derivitives such as Rocky or Alma Linux. We’ve seen a few issues with cyphers not being compatible across major releases. Which slows down access for my users who need to access data on various NFS shares.

My users are scientists conducting oceanography research and model development.
  • Stability
  • Keeping software up to date
  • Compatibility
  • Of course pricing is always an issue.
I’d recommend Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) due to it’s widespread acceptance. But I’d also recommend Rocky and/or Alma as alternatives if the price tag on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is a concern.
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We have RHEL installed on all of our servers, which allows us to run Open Stack and/or Open Shift. We also use RHEL to help us with our virtualization platform, which allows us to provide our tenants with virtual machines or Kubernetes pods.
  • Stable Upgrades.
  • Customer support.
  • RCA
  • Faster root cause analysis.
  • Assist with esoteric hardware option.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux is well suited for virtualization; Verizon runs its internal private cloud on it.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We use RHEL primarily for Production-level workloads. We also use RHEL on physical and virtual workstations so developers can utilize and maintain their apps with a GUI. Our business problems include an environment heavily reliant on Linux, but end-users often do not have previous Linux experience. RHEL and the GNOME Desktop make it easy for the end-users to have a familiar-feeling environment.
  • Outstanding stability. Some air-gapped systems have been online for several months without any intervention.
  • Timely updates. Red Hat owns and supports RHEL, so package updates, including applicable errata, are released very quickly.
  • Amazing Package Manager. The DNF/yum package manager, along with the Red Hat AppStream and BaseOS repositories, features many up-to-date package versions and a wide variety of packages.
  • Other Software Integration & Compatibility with FIPS.
RHEL is excellent for environments that do not have any specific compliance requirements, as everything works great out of the box without any additional options being needed. However, if additional compliance options are required (such as PCI-DSS or HIPAA), there are many hardening options available out of the box. Some scenarios where RHEL would not be appropriate are for environments or organizations that heavily rely on DEB or APT packages, such as Ubuntu systems.
May 08, 2024

RHEL OS experience

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Meteorcomm uses RHEL as the operating system for our Interoperable Train Control Messaging (ITCM) product. RHEL provides a well-supported operating system which provides stability, performance, and high availability, all features which our messaging system requires. ITCM is also built on top of key Red Hat technologies, in particular Messaging Realtime Grid (MRG), allowing us to leverage a well-documented and supported set of features.
  • Performance
  • Stability
  • High availability
  • Core messaging functionality
  • Support for 32-bit systems (hundreds of thousands of devices in the field running on 32-bit hardware can no longer be updated)
  • Ease of use for clustering technology (stonith and fencing documentation could be made more straightforward)
  • Support for lightweight containerization which can be orchestrated on single board computers
Corporate and industrial applications where stability and support are most important.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
As a developer we use Red Hat Enterprise linux as Operating System and as development platform for our software development.
  • Documentation
  • Stability
  • Support
  • Enterprise
  • Customization with non-redhat platforms
  • Backwards compatibility to previous majors
  • Sometimes hard to migrate when critical features disappear (x86)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux is great for enterprise business solutions where a lot of different machines needs to be managed. RedHat provides a lot of different platform to help you gain control. On the other hand. RedHat should support more development based solutions where you can install the system and start development. Currently a lot of configuration is required before you can start to develop
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
I use RHEL as the main Linux distribution for production services and for all my development
  • Support
  • Documentation
  • Stabillity
  • Enterprise
  • Customization
  • Backwards compatibility
  • Support for legacy software
It is very well suited in production environment where stability is key.
Is is less suited for quick testing and prototyping.
May 08, 2024

RHEL Review

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Linux admin, performing patching and deploying of servers and applications
  • Support
  • Global affiliations
  • Large userbase
  • software compatibility
  • additional GUIs to choose from
  • something like uptrack for kernal patching
I have an over all good experience with RHEL during a work environment. I have also used it in a lab environment at home where I would install additional applications on RHEL 6 7 and even RHEL 8. I can't think of anything scenarios where it would not be appropriate
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
System administration and dev/ops.
  • System resource management. Software doesn't over use hardware resources and bad behaved software generally doesn't crash other software.
  • Software development. Easy to install many languages and write and compile code in those languages.
  • Device communication. Its easy to get and use drivers that communicate with serial, or networked, etc. devices.
  • It could be easier to determine dependencies of some packages and find the dependent packages.
  • It could be easier to configure some of the packages that are configured in the GUI, from the command line, like nmcli.
In my opinion RHEL is extremely capable for most all work done. Maybe not as easy for some office type applications but still very capable.
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
ResellerIncentivized
I use Red Hat Enterprise Linux for Cloud-based Virtual Machines and to deploy large OLTP solutions in highly performant, highly reliable configurations. Red Hat Enterprise Linux supports workloads for SAP, Oracle and other large scale databases for customers and application providers.
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux for SAP/HANA and SAP Applications
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux with High Availability for NFS file system workloads
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux with Enterprise MSSQL with Regional Failover
  • Security update process for packages including in core
  • Support for non-standard integrations where there is significant market opportunity
  • Support for BTRFS
Workloads on public cloud where customers require reliability and supportability for applications and targeted hardware for multiple years.
May 24, 2023

my review.

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Admin for USE Linux servers. Running various applications on-prem and in the cloud. Currently working toward SAP deployment. Approx 400 servers across all platforms. Dell Boomi, JMS, Satellite, and Ansible, are some of the apps that come to mind. Can't think of any problems at the moment. We automate builds and get them to app owners to do their thing.
  • security
  • reliability
  • compatibility
  • Command changes.
  • More and more tools make things more complex, even though they are meant to ease things.
Large scalable environments. Currently working toward SAP setup. Things have been stable so far. Uptime is great, aside from normal patching reboots. The only thing I can think of where Rhel wouldn't be too great is a workstation. Works well for most things, but I've found a few tools that there isn't a Linux port for.
May 23, 2023

RED HAT

Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Close to 5000+ servers running on Red Hat Linux and planing to move to Containersation platform to reduce the hardware scalability
  • Scalability
  • Compliance and Patch management
  • Cost reduction
  • Automated way of patching and compliance, we know its already available with Ansible but thinking lot of space to add additional features
  • Migration to newer version from old EOL systems makes easier adoption of Red Hat Linux
  • Expecting more of contianersation and scalable env for new technolgy business applications
For large and small scale applications which limited CPU usages works level but Red Hat need to develop think for DB based systems to make sure they run without any performance degrade
May 23, 2023

RHEL Review

BHANUCHANDRA KOMMALAPATI | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We are using RHEL as major OS for our Linux Infra . we are focusing more in containterzion on Red Hat servers
  • No hardware specific and runs on any Physical and virtual infra
  • Easy to get vendor assistance
  • More Secure and manageble
  • docker
  • docker images
  • Performance
we are using Red Hat among 8K servers and patching is very fun for us :)
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
The operating system is used in the company. The system is really stable and scalable. It's supported by a robust company that creates the upgrades and vulnerability patches for the releases and applications and this helps to narrow the bridge between the new software compared with other operating systems. RHEL has also many applications on top of the operating system which easy the configuration as a platform integrated with different packages and software that help to ease, manage and scale the configurations of the System. RHEL also is increasing the portfolio of the RHEL with applications such as containers, Ansible, JBoss, and others to have a robust product that can be configured in a single system. The levels of support and the cost of subscription are also competitive for the use of the technology and the IT costs of today.
  • Excellent delivery of patches, upgrades, and solutions for vulnerabilities.
  • Excellent support
  • Competitive prices for today's IT
  • It doesn't have another boot environment, like Solaris (BE) or AIX. This will help upgrade O.S. in physical hardware.
  • Training courses, documentation and certification is expensive
  • Personalized solutions are lacking and high cost which is joined to expensive training makes some products and configurations less attractive than for example AWS.
RHEL is excellent for the usage of Operating systems where a high available Linux is needed and the following features are needed: - High available Linux and configurations in the cluster - Patching cycles for vulnerabilities is needed on an ongoing basis and also configuration management with Red Hat Satellite - Support within 7x24. - Integration using automation of a high amount of servers needs to be accomplished. For example, using Ansible
Holman Cárdenas, M.Eng, TOGAF®, ITIL® | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Red Hat Enterprise Linux is used across the whole organization for our servers, mainly for the mission-critical environments running Oracle DB. It provides an efficient, secure and stable platform we are happy with.
  • Quick turnaround time on security releases.
  • Reliable OS providing a strong environnement.
  • Excellent support through the RHEL site.
  • Complex upgrade policies between major versions.
  • Hardware compatibility.
  • Cost.
This should be your first choice if you are thinking about using Linux mission-critical servers and/or Oracle databases. Price could be a con if you are a small or budget-restricted company starting operations (in that case I would recommend you CentOS because it is free and in case you don't mind searching in the community when you'd need support).
October 22, 2019

RHEL is worth using

Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
ResellerIncentivized
It's been used by my organization and we support the product which is robust and secure. It's easy to understand and helpful in troubleshooting issues with different trees assigned for each function.
  • It is very secure where root access is the only option to make any major changes, and profiles and roles have been defined to assign user-level access to different directories.
  • During troubleshooting it's easy to fix one since each feature has its own directory to look for and it's easy to point to the issue.
  • Vulnerabilities are fixed with easy patch creation which fixed the issue quickly and without affecting the other working features.
  • Graphical representation has to be more user-friendly.
  • Layman should be able to understand the directory and work on the feature enablement and disablement in Linux.
It's suited for data center and voice that needs to be very secure and robust. If basic user level changes are required, then Linux fails since it's not very user-friendly for the layman.
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Currently, RHEL is deployed on a legacy blade server (Dell Poweredge 1950) for testing Redmine project management system to track research projects, as well as to test the defectiveness of Redmine in replacing our current production ticketing system.

In Addition to Redmine, we also use Cockpit on RHEL (in our test/development), which functions as a makeshift NOC
  • Stability
  • Admin workflows
  • Will boot on hardware that other systems may not boot on (especially on legacy systems)
  • Upgrading
  • RPM is getting old
  • I'd like to see RHEL move away from rpms, and use a faster system such as apt
In our current configuration, Red Hat works well as legacy-centric OS: not running virtualization, but offering bare-metal testing of services and software. For example, being able to run a legacy version of Red Hat can give you access to tool-chains (compilers, assemblers, etc) that are not available today (because as tech moved on, they became broken), and having that ability works well. Also- our server is a single-core, dual processor unit, with 8GB/1GB stick RAM, and 500 GB HD (all low-end specs, now), and Red Hat (v19) booted with no problems, and even booted back up on its HD as a rescue environment.
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
RHEL provides the flexibility and stability required for the implementation of a company-wide application used in the processing of data retrieved from several databases hosted in Oracle. By using RHEL we were able to implement a custom solution, built upon PostgreSQL and RedHat's Jboss, which allowed the automated conversion of the Oracle data into one usable by other applications. RHEL allowed us to implement:
1. An extremely stable system which can best be described as "power on and leave alone"
2. Custom scripts for monitoring both the OS and application
  • Very well thought out package manager, that not only installs the software you want but also the prerequisites when necessary.
  • Excellent support through the RHEL site and the overall community
  • Straightforward installation with easy to follow menus and guides
  • Licensing is thoroughly explained and with full instructions on how to apply for new and renewed licenses
  • While the command line installation runs well, the desktop GUI tends to be resource intensive at times
  • The GUI based install menu does not scale well at times resulting in some menu options spilling offscreen
  • By default a menu based network manager should be included, from my experience particularly with the minimal install, this was not the case resulting in me editing the configuration file directly. Additionally, network tools should also be installed by default.
As an OS, RHEL can be implemented as a user OS and Server OS. the features and customization make its uses almost limitless. two areas in which the OS shine would be:
1. Automated systems in which a minimal OS is required and user intervention is limited
2. Hosting of sensitive information either as a file or web server. The extensive security features and customization allow admins to tweak the OS as needed, allowing unprecedented control.
Return to navigation