Contact us for pricing.
We're sorry, but no detailed pricing edition information is available.
A 7-day free trial is offered.
Other pricing plans from leading alternatives in this category.
| Feature | Free Version | Paid Version |
|---|---|---|
| Phone | Available | Available |
| Live Chat | Available | Available |
| Available | Available | |
| Forum/Community | Available | Available |
| FAQ/Knowledgebase | Available | Available |
| Social Media | Available | Available |
| Video Tutorials / Webinar | Available | Available |
Sigma computing has better pricing than the competitors. We're always looking for what is good for the price but also gives us all we need to complete
year to another without including all years in the visual. I.E. the primary value is 2022 and the comparison line is 2021. Greater ability to customize aspects
Pricing UI is intuitive but powerful features require deeper knowledge of SQL
analysis on our clearinghouse data. One of our use cases is to identify pricing gaps with each of our clearing houses, instead of going to our AD to request … for our use case, I utilized Sigma Computing to identify any gaps for pricing current settlements of TBA. Currently,…
2 biggest reasons for Sigma were easy of use for power users, and cost of having a large amount of viewers of the data.
BI platform for their organization. If too small, not worth it yet. The cost structure just isn't worth it for sub 150-200 users. If too large of a company
overall I love Sigma Computing. due to the price, I don't think I will recommend to any company that's smaller in size and
Aspect, Improved Decision Making In Positive Aspect, Increased Revenue and Cost Savings In Positive Aspect, Enhanced collaboration In Negative Aspect, Complex
Customer Support when there are issues Allowing free view accounts keeps the cost down
thing we've gotten from Sigma Computing. A bad thing would obviously be a cost increase
Price New features. Solution compatibility.
Tableau too expensive Mode also too expensive and kind of shitty
the data expertise and literacy grows within the org. Start up effort and cost is too high in the tools that are built for large corporate solutions.
analyze data in multiple ways has saved time The slowness and downtime has cost us time We do not have to download the reports to Google or Excel like we
don't work. When you create a filter using a worksheet as a source for the values, the column you are trying to use simply doesn't appear. This forces you
Creating overview dashboards for clients Empowering business users to create value for clients Less Appropriate Creating beautiful, in-depth dashboards for
between dashboards, etc. Users who want to explore the reports need a more expensive license. This seems just a little more restrictive than we would like.
Allowing for Relative Values between columns, in tables, and pivot tables (% difference, for example)
adaptability in terms of how easy it is for an organization to adopt and derive value from without being technically apt.
Chartio was discontinued, and Looker + Sisense were too expensive.
allows you to quickly get access to your data questions and start deriving value very quickly and easily.
The decision to move to Sigma was mainly a business decision based on cost, as the vast majority of our users are external customers of ours. Sigma is
Sigma has a good balance of affordability, self-service ability for technical teams, and ease of use. We chose
