Acumatica review
Overall Satisfaction with Acumatica
We use Acumatica for Sales, Manufacturing and Finance. We had several disconnected systems and a nightmare set of spreadsheets that were all manually updated from each other, and Acumatica brought our business information together into a reliable, accurate, and reportable system
Pros
- Gives visibility to our production environment
- Allows for global sales
Cons
- Upgradability
- inconsistent function of some items, like bundle explosion and automatic mark for production
- Much less time spent manually entering some information,
- Reduced data redundant entry
4-6 months
OUr users all have access to information they require to do their jobs, and they all have the ability to look up details about things we make and sell
Medical industry, and it is a little lacking in the Regulatory environment out of the box
Do you think Acumatica delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Acumatica's feature set?
Yes
Did Acumatica live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Acumatica go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Acumatica again?
Yes
Acumatica Feature Ratings
Using Acumatica
100 - Sales, manufacturing , engineering, inventory, distribution.
2 - System thinking. Understanding that a small change in one area can effect the entire business in different ways
- Size
- Complexity
- International sales
- Use it to feed automation in our manufacturing areas
- Use it to provide insight into things we had never been able to accurately track.
Evaluating Acumatica and Competitors
Yes - Globalshop and everest
- Cloud Solutions
- Scalability
- Integration with Other Systems
- Ease of Use
More focus on the company part of sales and marketing
Acumatica Support
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Quick Resolution Knowledgeable team Kept well informed | Problems left unsolved Escalation required Need to explain problems multiple times Slow Initial Response |
Yes. Needed for implementation challenges
Yes - No. Only in subsequent release
Cannot think of a specific situation where this was the case


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation