Accelerate Conceptual Phase Process with Adobe Firefly
November 25, 2024

Accelerate Conceptual Phase Process with Adobe Firefly

Eric Gangnath | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Adobe Firefly

Working as art director in house for a growing brand with limited resources, Adobe Firefly has been very helpful for a variety of uses inward facing and with business partners. The biggest use case is in creating storyboards and creative pitches for our campaigns and new product development. While Adobe Firefly images does look realistic enough to pass as actually real, we strictly use AI generated assets in the development phase of our consumer facing final products. My team and I have used Adobe Firefly to imagine anything from stylized photography for campaign pitch decks, to illustrations, patterns, and icon concepting for our brand assets. It has been the most useful with storyboarding our creative concepts without worrying about budget or timelines to actually photograph or illustrate concept narratives or photography compositions.

Pros

  • Creating rich photography in a stylized way
  • Imagining patterns or icon styles
  • Creating textures for our new product development renders
  • Imagining new product forms for our packaging innovation

Cons

  • Image creation involving a specific number of people
  • Anatomy of humans - limbs, hands, feet etc
  • Rendering out people who are average looking as opposed to model perfection
  • Rendering people of races other than caucasian
  • Increased our conceptual thinking speed
  • Saved money on outsourcing creative needs for storyboards
  • Helped elevate our packaging innovation cycle with creative approaches to form in the packaging world
  • Helped speed up the creation of campaign pitch decks and has reduced the number of revisions needed by allowing for more accurate depictions of concept earlier in the process of pitching internally.
It's easy enough to work and create. Prompt specifics are challenging some of the time and don't seem to follow an exact science or method to allow for consistent generations of creative assets.
Midjourney was not in this list but that is the most similar to Firefly in my opinion. I find that Adobe Firefly and Midjourney have a lot of overlap. The generative fill options on Photoshop and Illustrator also include very similar use cases with generating photography and extending areas of a photo to imagine outside of the crop.

Do you think Adobe Firefly delivers good value for the price?

Not sure

Are you happy with Adobe Firefly's feature set?

Yes

Did Adobe Firefly live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of Adobe Firefly go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Adobe Firefly again?

Yes

I recommend using Adobe Firefly in the early concepting phase for an open ended creative approach. Firefly is great for sparking new ideas and compositions. I also think Firefly does an incredible job with accurate lighting and perspective. Firefly is strong developing patterns and rendering difficult textures -- like iridescent or metallic finishes on packaging. I do not recommend Firefly for very specific prescriptive compositions or narratives. For instance, creating a scene where composition needs to be exact or even close to exact is difficult. I also don't think Firefly is very useful for consistent narrative builds. For instance, creating a storyboard with the same characters in multiple orientations or narrative arcs usually will not work for me.

Comments

More Reviews of Adobe Firefly