Powerful audio editing tools with a no-frills interface
Overall Satisfaction with Audacity
Our team produces a number of podcasts on development, design, and content strategy — audio editing isn't a normal part of our workflow, so we don't have a suite of high-end editing tools on hand to use. Our hunt for a low-cost, cross-platform audio editing tool flexible enough for multi-track editing and post-processing led us to Audacity and we've been using it ever since.
Pros
- Audio filtering and processesing
- Multi-track editing and audio compositing
Cons
- User experience and workflow is… very open source
- Lacks presets or guidance for common export targets (podcasting, CD-quality music, etc)
- Better quality podcast audio, happier listeners!
- Zero cost to evaluate and use, though the learning curve is steeper than some other options.
Using Apple's GarageBand for audio editing felt like fighting someone else's highly opinionated ideas of how we should be working. Simple tasks (like keeping audio in sync while making edits across multiple tracks) felt like more work than they should've been, while other tasks (noise reduction, balancing levels) felt so simplified that we had less control than Audacity.
Adobe Audition was just too much tool for us — we had access to it via our company's Creative Cloud subscriptions, but the learning curve was too high for our relatively modest production needs. Audacity, for all of its clunky interface issues, fit just right.
Adobe Audition was just too much tool for us — we had access to it via our company's Creative Cloud subscriptions, but the learning curve was too high for our relatively modest production needs. Audacity, for all of its clunky interface issues, fit just right.
Do you think Audacity delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Audacity's feature set?
Yes
Did Audacity live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Audacity go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Audacity again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation