Item: Automox
Rating: 10
Author: Anthony Turnbull

Overall Satisfaction with Automox

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

[...] uses Automox to standadise patching on all our Windows and MacOS endpoints. Patch Management: Ensuring all endpoints are up-to-date with the latest security patches to mitigate risks of vulnerabilities and cyberattacks, this includes OS and 3rd party patching.

Endpoint Security: Proactively addressing security threats and vulnerabilities before they can exploit the devices.

Pros and Cons

Pros

OS Patching
3rd Party App patching
Lightweight agent

Cons

More user-friendly notifications

Return on Investment

time saving, once it has been deployed it just does it's thing with very little admin overhead.

Patching

Reduced vulnerabilities across the endpoint estate.

Usability

The MacOS deployment could do with a little work in terms of the addional permissions it requires, but this is not entirely Automox's fault.

Alternatives Considered

Ivanti Endpoint Manager

Much more cost effective.

Key Insights

Do you think Automox delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Automox's feature set?

Yes

Did Automox live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Automox go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Automox again?

Yes

Likelihood to Recommend

Automox work's well as patch managment tool that standadises our fleet patching (Windows & MacOS) we have the same policies and deployment method to both operating system enviroments and the same set of policies within Automox.

Comments

Please log in to join the conversation