Overall Satisfaction with Ceridian Dayforce
Ceridian Dayforce Payroll and WFM is being used across our entire US population. We are implementing all talent modules over the next 6-9 months.
- Configurable
- Flexible
- User-Friendly
- State-Mandated form integration into the Onboarding Module (NY, CA, DC)
- More robust Recruitment Module
- Feeds with Background/I-9 Vendors to allow you to selected the vendor of your choice, not just those that are integrated with Ceridian. Currently with EBI, and we have to initiate background screenings by flipping a status and the status of the backgrounds are housed outside the system.
- Efficencies
- Less Mistakes with manually manipulated data
- User-Friendly experience for end-users
It does enable compliance, but you need to build it; the platform does not start at a legally compliant level.
It's very efficient to only have to touch the employment record once and have the information update in real time. It's unlike any other HRIS/HRM I've used in the past.
We migrated from ADP Workforce Now; the data was messy and not linked. All their modules were independent, so utilizing their talent modules was cumbersome and ultimately the performance module we had activated in the system was not utilized. I was a admin of Paylocity prior to joining my current organization; I did not have the ability to modify setup like I do with Dayforce. Their WebPay and WebTime applications were not linked; as such, an employee record, which was housed in WebPay would require extra effort to flow into WebTime. For instance, Terminations in WebPay would appear active in WebTime; so there was risk for paying addition PPE if not audited; time off balances would not update without a manual step and time off calendars if you had a mix of auto-pay and time sheet employees would not be contained on the same time off calendar, making it difficult for managers to manage their team's time away from work.