Model your content as you like.
Overall Satisfaction with Contentstack
We use Contentstack to create and localize landingpages for our webshops. We also use it to handle SEO texts and content elements on our commerce pages like PDP, Basket & Check-Out. Other than that, we use it to power our blog. We use scheduled publishing a lot to be able to plan our work, and we make content components that can handle structured content in order to automate graphical elements on the sites.
Pros
- Flexible & Modular Content Models.
- Scheduled Publishing.
- Automation Hub.
- 3rd Party Connectors.
Cons
- Very low rate limits on bulk-publishing entries & assets (10 entries in 10 locales limit).
- Error messages that aren't meaningful to users,
- Limits on number of asset folders.
- No content types supporting building a website navigation.
- Users can create beautiful content without the help of developers.
- Structured Content improves the SEO ranking of our sites.
- Seamless translation flow with the XTM connector.
- Contentful and Storyblok
Featurewise, there's not a lot that separates these CMSs, and it's hard to assess in a SW selection phase exactly how the products stack up against each other. Ultimately, the choice of Contentstack came down to the dialogue with the sales rep.
Do you think Contentstack delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Contentstack's feature set?
Yes
Did Contentstack live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Contentstack go as expected?
No
Would you buy Contentstack again?
Yes

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation