Much better than it used to be, but still in need of improvements
Overall Satisfaction with Dynatrace Network Application Monitoring (NAM), formerly DCRUM
Dynatrace Network Application Monitoring (NAM), formerly DCRUM, is far better when it is integrated with Dynatrace. As DCRUM, it was a very difficult tool to manage and deploy. Once the architecture was changed, it provided a lot more value than before. It is mainly used to find network captures and where traffic is flowing and how. It's very helpful in finding packet flow.
Pros
Cons
- Dynatrace as a whole has a lot to improve in network management
- While it provides a lot of data, it is not always comprehensive; it still needs some manual digging into the issues
- Dynatrace Network Application Monitoring (NAM), formerly DCRUM, helped us get a lot of info on an ongoing issue.
- It helped us figure out network bottlenecks in our environment.
- It is a very costly tool and a lot of other cheaper tools give same kind of info.
Do you think Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), discontinued delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), discontinued's feature set?
Yes
Did Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), discontinued live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), discontinued go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Data Center Real-User Monitoring (DCRUM), discontinued again?
No

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation