Overall Satisfaction with ESET Endpoint Security
We use ESET Endpoint as the default antivirus solution at this organization as well as at the 7 other managed organizations that we are associated with. The intention behind its implementation is to mitigate viral threats as well as act as a more robust firewall for all endpoints.
- Thorough reporting
- Firewall management
- Endpoint security
- Regular client updates
- There has been some functionality loss in the ESET Administrator Console since migrating from version 6 to its current version.
- The firewall can often flag false positives.
- Reporting
- Centralized Administration
- Consistency
- I have been using ESET Endpoint for two years now with this org and have had consistent results with trojan and browser hijackers.
- No negative impacts have been experienced.
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP)
It was pre-existing when I came to this company so ESET is dug in deep and removing it would be a process. Defender was nice and is a solution I wouldn't mind moving to. My biggest concern is web protection due to the amount of password compromise request emails the user base gets so have a system that is big on web protection is a must.
Do you think ESET PROTECT delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with ESET PROTECT's feature set?
Yes
Did ESET PROTECT live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of ESET PROTECT go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy ESET PROTECT again?
Yes