Positive F5 BIG-IP experience for new deployment
Overall Satisfaction with F5 BIG-IP
We use F5 BIG-IP for standard LTM load balancing with some GTM/DNS geo-location for cross data center services. F5 BIG-IP provides SSL security and general application load balancing for most of our infrastructure services.
Pros
- Consistent deployment structure for vservers
- Highly customizable profiles with straight-forward inheritance
- Flexible deployment model (VE, hardware, etc.)
Cons
- Easier support for multiple pools behind a vserver
- Better documentation on features/options under configurations
- Object UUID model or similar to allow flexibility in renaming objects
- Improve cli stat data and ability to view running configurations
- Ease of deployment in migrating from previous vendor
- Cost savings and feature/scale flexibility with FCP
Do you think F5 BIG-IP delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with F5 BIG-IP's feature set?
Yes
Did F5 BIG-IP live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of F5 BIG-IP go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy F5 BIG-IP again?
Yes
F5 BIG-IP Feature Ratings
Using F5 BIG-IP
300 - Application support teams that run their infrastructure and limited e-commerce applications behind vservers running on F5 BIG-IP LTM. These are application owners who will enable and disable pool members in their applications.
30 - Network infrastructure team that supports the management and deployment of applications on F5 BIG-IP.
- SSL offload and end to end encrypted connections
- Application load balancing
- ISE authentication load balancing
- LDAP and DNS service load balancing
- Looking at vserver and configuration baseline automation
Evaluating F5 BIG-IP and Competitors
Yes - NetScaler based on a change in behavior by Citrix with our contract.
- Scalability
- Ease of Use
We were looking to maintain a hardware based solution for our on-prem deployments that provided performance and capacity with a minimal footprint.
Would definitely have a longer lead time to evaluate all competitors. Would dig more into the automation of services on the platforms and ease of tying into deployment pipelines.



Comments
Please log in to join the conversation