More Sugar More Sweet
Updated April 25, 2017

More Sugar More Sweet

Sharmin Promi | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with HP UFT

  1. UFT is used for automation across the entire organization across different projects.
  2. It is used for continuous integration.
  3. It is also used for different types of testing, ex: desktop application testing, cross browser testing, API testing etc.
  • One automation tool is capable of handling different types of testing, ex: API testing, desktop application testing, browser testing, Mobile testing etc.
  • NO other tools in the market currently support everything in one tool, ex: detailed results, screenshots, and saving and forwarding the execution result.
  • UFT is easily integrated with other continuous integration tools like ALM, Jenkins, TeamCity etc.
  • Very expensive tool for startup or small organization. HP should offer different payment plans and different package.
  • UFT should improve more in the cross browser compatibility side and different OS platform.
  • Should improve in supporting MAC OS system
  • UFT is a very good investment for any organization because one tool is capable of handling different types of testing, so the organization is spending more money for one tool rather spending a higher price for different set of tools for different purposes.
  • HP does offer good packages and payment plans for UFT licenses and the price is well managed if the number of licenses increases.
  • One of the most reliable and oldest tools in the market which provides available resource and technical support based on an organization's need.
[My] company uses UFT across different projects and different departments for all types of testing and automation.
UFT is very well suited for browser testing and API testing because detailed execution results and screenshots are available with it. UFT needs improvement around mobile testing and different OS testing.